SOLO-International Op-Ed: Corpseman-in-Chief

Michael Moeller
February 8, 2010

With each new long, drawn out, and substantively empty speech, President Obama's silver tongue has revealed a brain of mush. Most recently, Obama referred to a Navy corpsman as "corpseman", since apparently the teleprompter has not yet incorporated pronunciations phonetically for Dear Leader. Nevertheless, I found the term a wonderfully symbolic moniker for the president himself, and not just applied to his intellectual vacuity, but rather to the entirety of his methods and goals.

I find Heller's treatment of Frank's drinking to be suspicious, to say the least.

John Stossel is leaving ABC to do a weekly one-hour prime time show on Fox News. He states

SOLO-International Op-Ed: The Obamanous Parallels

Michael Moeller
September 10, 2009

“History is philosophy teaching by example.”—Thucydides

According to the following policies and methods, can you name this US president?

SOLO-International Op-Ed: Comrade Sonia

Michael Moeller
July 17, 2009

Although Sonia Sotomayor's connections to various organizations are important, they are a consequence. What is most important is the legal philosophy that lead her to aligning herself with such organizations. Georgetown law professor Randy Barnett makes some great suggestions for clarifying the judicial philosophy and Constitutional outlook of the nominee--and of Congress.

[Lifted from the The Anti-American President Pt 3 thread—Linz]

Analogous to Benjamin Button, Sherk seems to be moving backwards from the facts of reality as time marches on and Obama's policies get progressively worse.

Snipping from a post by Aaron Bilger on the

Ok Linz, you get your gauntlet. What makes the the "American Airhead" distinct to the current state of the culture, as compared with previous eras? The culture in toto? Or distinct areas?

I came across "The Conservatism of Robert W. Tracinski" by Nicholas Provenzo and found myself shaking my head in disgust.

I've lifted this from the "Phil's Plan for World Conquest" thread because it's inspiring—Linz

Phil,

"Moving in a steady decline over the past century"? Really? Then what do you make of the Red Decade? How about the counter-culture of the 60s? The philosophical and cultural underpinnings of those days are favorable compared to today?

I wasn't alive during either of those decades so my finger isn't exactly on the pulse of the culture during those times. However, for evidence look no further than the acceptance of Rand's ideas. What do you make of her early struggles just getting her fiction published, compared with the resounding success the novels enjoy today? I think you are looking at a significant change in the culture--albeit it a subtle one--when even a hardcore Hollywood Lefty like Oliver Stone wants to make a movie out of one of her novels.