I, Clinton.

Olivia's picture
Submitted by Olivia on Thu, 2016-07-28 03:29


I, Clinton.
by Olivia Pierson

“Claudius, make me a goddess,” begged the serpentine Livia before exhaling her dying breath into the face of her all-powerful grandson and ancient Rome’s fifth Emperor. Seeking to solicit the genuflection of citizens even from beyond the grave bespoke the extent of her toxic lust for power over the minds of people; a cell-deep craving in her bloodless bosom.

Power-lusting is a curious pathology - a symptom of unchecked narcissistic urges which cause a person to do anything in order to hold on to their status. It is not the same thing as genuine ambition, which at least requires the Self to achieve something meaningful by way of human endeavour. Given that the cunning Livia could never commit herself to open political achievements in her day by virtue of being born a woman in a truly patriarchal society, we could perhaps forgive her deceitful manipulations and manoeuvrings – perhaps. But today, when boardrooms and senates have been a wide open field to competent women for many decades, devious behaviour from an ambitious female is not only desperate, it’s downright wicked.

When former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton chose to lie while under oath to the House Select Committee on Benghazi about her use of the questionable private email server, she perjured herself at least thrice.

Since FBI Director James Comey’s investigative findings have come out things have been made a little clearer in their details.

Hillary Clinton said she turned over “all work related emails,” but of course, this was not true. Comey announced they recovered work-related emails which had not been part of the original handover. She and her lawyers wiped some thirty thousand of them beyond “complete forensic” reach. (After the latest email hack scandal on the eve of the DNC, we can now probably assume they are in the hands of the Kremlin, though note how pathetically Hillary's campaign managers are trying to blame Donald Trump for this!)

Clinton also stated that her attorneys had “gone through every single email,” but Comey declared that:

“Her lawyers did not individually read the content of all of her emails.”

That’s perjury number two.

But the most egregious lie in any normal person’s book (excluding her supporters) is in regard to Clinton’s personal handling of classified emails. She repeatedly asserted:

“There was nothing marked classified on my e-mails, either sent or received.”

This assertion has been shamelessly mimicked by Clinton on her campaign trial... I mean trail more times than her husband said, “I never had sexual relations with that woman.” Yet Comey judged Clinton and her colleagues’ handling of classified information as “extremely careless” and then said this:

“In addition to highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail.”

So, she lied and lied and lied – under oath. Then Comey recommended that the State Department not indict her.

Why did he do this?

During his hearing by the Oversight Committee & Government Reform Committee he said because he could find no evidence that she had lied to the FBI, and that there did not exist a precedent within U.S law to pursue criminal charges for such “extreme carelessness.” He cited a 100 year old statute which had only been invoked once for an espionage case, that went on to not be adjudicated. When he was asked why Hillary Clinton had not been prosecuted for perjury for lying under oath in the Benghazi hearings, he replied, “The FBI had received no referral from Congress to do so.”

It was clear that James Comey felt these deeds were not a criminal issue but a democracy issue, since now all the hearings can be read and watched by any citizen who cares to inform themselves on the internet. The trouble is that I have not spoken to a single Hillary supporter who would care to. Not one. The fact that she has gotten away with not being held accountable for the circumstances surrounding the deaths of four Americans while she was their Secretary of State serves, in their book, to make her appear clever, strong and savvy – attributes they like to see a female leader possess. Shudder.

Hillary has now gone on to officially become the Democratic nominee at the Democratic National Convention where there has been a lot of praise heaped upon her head for her work with migrants and children. She herself talks a lot about migrants, about how much she supports and respects their efforts to come to the United States and about how much they deserve to have a president who values those efforts.

Yet, she brutally threw under the bus one particular United States migrant and citizen when she blatantly blamed the Benghazi terrorist attack on a man who had made a very amateur film, titled “The Innocence of Muslims,” which she, President Obama and US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, all stated in 2012 was the cause of the “spontaneous uprising.” (This was always false. The cause of the attack was a well planned, well executed Al Qaeda terrorist plot to kill Americans – as Hillary Clinton well knew at the time, evidenced by her intercepted phone call to then Egyptian prime minister, Hisham Kandil.)

This man’s name is Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, a Coptic Christian who wanted to do his bit to fight Islamic terrorism, knowing it was coming to America’s shores again. He posted the trailer of the film under a fake name on to Youtube. The reason he used a fake name was because he was not allowed to use the internet without permission as it violated the conditions of his probation after a credit card fraud conviction – yes, he’s a petty criminal, but after all the talk about a previous record not affecting future decisions regarding American citizens trying to get ahead - that the Democratic administration likes to indulge in whenever it can - here was their chance to make that a reality.

Instead he was arrested in the U.S three days after the Benghazi attack, two months before President Obama was elected for a second term. He spent the following year behind bars in prison, a sentence I suspect he may have been glad to serve considering that thanks to the good graces of the State Department leaking his real name as the filmmaker, fully knowing he was under the death penalty in the form of a fatwa issued from Egypt and also Pakistan, he was clearly on their hit list, bounty included, as any person who publicly draws attention to the atrocities of Islam now happens to be (example: upstanding citizen & American author Ed Cline). Was Nakoula Basseley Nakoula protected by the so called migrant-loving Secretary of State? I think not. He now lives in a homeless shelter somewhere in L.A spending most of his time looking over his shoulder. His “life” is over.

We know beyond any dispute that Hillary Clinton is a rabid liar who will always put her need to be the first American female president first, second and last. What deeply disgusts me is why so many Americans, especially women and blacks, are so desperate to worship “a goddess” at the helm of their country’s leadership that they are prepared to disregard the content of her mendacious, covetous character.



Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Even tho' she's also massively corrupt and lying, the more correct term for Hillary is criminal or felon.

Is corruption a structural prerequsite?

Andrew Atkin's picture

If Hillary Clinton was not corrupt, who would invest in her? If you're not going to do a donors bidding, ahead of the publics bidding, then why would a potential donor invest in you?

It seems to me that being corrupt is a structural prerequisite to existing as a political option in America, except for strange cases like Donald Trump who are not dependant on external donors.

If that's right then American politics has a far more serious problem, demanding reforms that will go way beyond what Trump would deliver.

....So maybe Hillary is a pig because it could actually be no other way? If it's not pig Hillary it would have to be pig someone else? The non-corrupt need not apply.

Just a thought Smiling

This is also plausible as to

gregster's picture

This is also plausible as to why the FBI failed to uphold the law. Hey, when you have the Clinton Foundation and Soros's army of hitmen and Zero playing drones it's no wonder Comey looked scared:

Thanks to Friday’s FBI document dump — 189 more pages of reports from the Bureau’s year-long foray (“investigation” would not be the right word) into the Clinton e-mail scandal — we now know for certain what I predicted some eight months ago here at NRO: Any possibility of prosecuting Hillary Clinton was tanked by President Obama’s conflict of interest.

As I explained in February, when it emerged that the White House was refusing to disclose at least 22 communications Obama had exchanged with then-secretary Clinton over the latter’s private e-mail account, we knew that Obama had knowingly engaged in the same misconduct that was the focus of the Clinton probe: the reckless mishandling of classified information.

To be sure, he did so on a smaller scale.

National Review, September 26, 2016

Obstruction of Justice & Comey's take....

Olivia's picture

Listen to Ratcliffe's sum up here, and his conclusion re the FBIs decisions around Crooked Hillary. Comey's limp response at the very end is just too puzzling, but fits with what Ratcliffe is saying - that the decision to not indict Clinton was made long before the investigation was complete.

And this from Mr. Collins of Georgia - "You blew it!" "This is the FBI trying not to look political."
I couldn't agree more; in trying too hard not to look political, they seem to have acted politically in giving special treatment
to the Wizard Clinton, playing us all.


Lindsay Perigo's picture


Olivia's picture

They figure that there must be a reason she has gotten away with so much for so long, so that what appears to be an obvious crime -- motivated by blatant sleaze -- is nevertheless somehow okay.

They think it makes her clever, savvy and a battler. Shudder.

To a culture which has internalised popular culture such as Goodfellas and the Sopranos to be "cool" with all their thuggery, murder and rape, Hillary is looking like the tits. They don't care that she's a bad girl, a very bad girl. Trump is up against the real deal Washington Mafia Matriarchy, all his wholesome family values, all Americanism and hardwork is going to look positively twee in comparison.

Being a Muslim...

Olivia's picture

is a mental health issue.

My Guess

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

I think that Hillary has committed so many crimes -- while being so dishonest, corrupt, and sleazy about it -- that people who would prosecute and jail her simply give up before they start. They figure that there must be a reason she has gotten away with so much for so long, so that what appears to be an obvious crime -- motivated by blatant sleaze -- is nevertheless somehow okay.

Same thing with Bill Clinton. Same with Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Anyone who points out their open -- and even brazen, in-your-face -- criminality, is immediately, popularly seen as being "bigoted" and "political". If you identify an obvious lie, or act of corruption, or crime, perpetrated by Hitlery then you're part of "the vast right-wing conspiracy" and guilty of "partisan politics".

If we can't put this monster in jail for the $99,500 "cattle futures" bribe in 1978, then we pretty much can't jail her for anything ever. So give up all hope, folks! Sad

Another Day, Another Attack

Neil Parille's picture

He's Somalian (which is 99.8% Muslim) but the police say it's mental health.

Perhaps Binswanger and Brook will explain how bombing Iran and Saudi Arabia would have prevented this.


Olivia's picture

Yes, your son was a hero that could not be manipulated but, you, Sir, are a weak minded FOOL. I would love to hear your thoughts this morning about the 1500 American soldiers on the air base in Turkey being held as basic hostages as I type. Not a word from this president or party you adore…or the media that so thoroughly manipulated and used you and your wife.

And people wonder why Trump dislikes NATO!

Where is Mr. President? Making pussy condemnations about the nominee who wants to "rethink NATO."



Tore's picture

You thought that was the insane thing said in the clip?

Ayn Rand's Intellectual Heir Thinks You Should . . . .

Neil Parille's picture

divorce your wife if you are "gay."


Michelle Malkin . . .

Neil Parille's picture

has an excellent articles on Muslims in the military:


Not One Muslim in the Military

Lindsay Perigo's picture

That should be the policy while Islamofilth is conducting Jihad. That should be Trump's next bomb.

Apart from anything else, the Khans are so fucking ugly. If I were that ugly I'd just stay at home.

Trump's observance...

Olivia's picture

was excellent that perhaps she's not allowed to speak.
Sin of sin calling into question the actions of a protected religion - even if it attacks you personally, as this horrible little man did.

Great letter from the other mother. Outraged!

If protecting America means fewer Muslim men from immigrant families serving in the armed forces, good! It means there may be less chance of terrorist attacks from within, like Forthood.

Reply to Filthy Muslim

Lindsay Perigo's picture


This is a letter from a Blue Star Mom:

To the Muslim Gold Star father that spoke at the DNC…..I have some thoughts on your comments. I am a Blue Star mother. My deepest condolences on the loss of your son. No family should have to endure such a loss. That being said….while your son is a hero, you Sir, are NOT. My son has served three tours of combat in the countries you and your family came from. Iraq and Afghanistan were his introduction to adulthood and service to something bigger than our individual selves. He was blown up by an IED set by your countrymen. His Purple Heart is a testament to his love of America and our freedoms. I have suffered through his multiple combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan….never knowing from moment to moment if he would return home in a flag draped coffin. It is torture when a mother wakes up to this day after day and sees the atrocities happening over there on the news and being helpless to change a thing. My comments to you will probably offend you. I do not apologize. These things need to be said. Unlike you, I could NEVER use my son’s death as a pawn piece in support of a woman that left “America’s treasure” (Hillarys words) to die unaided in Benghazi. The same woman that says vile things to her military details there to protect her. You, Sir, are supposed to be a witness to your son’s bravery and sacrifice. Instead you stood on a stage and promoted the woman that upholds the very people that killed your son. You became a political PAWN that promotes pandering to our enemy. You desecrated your son’s memory by your words. You did not utter one word of outrage at anyone but Donald Trump. Are you forgetting that Trump did not kill your son. He had nothing whatsoever to do with these wars. His memory should mean more to you than five minutes of fame on the stage of the party that voted to send your son to war. The same party that for eight years has denied and cheated our veterans out of their deserved medical care. Who for the last three years has cut our veterans pay. Of note…your wife stood SILENT. She stood with her head covered, never uttering a word about her loss. She submitted to you being her voice in front of the country. She abdicated her free voice to you…..as would any good Sharia wife and mother. Let me say, this was not lost on the other American military moms….myself included. Had it been my son being “used” as a political PROP, no one could have silenced me. I would be voicing my grief, my pride, my love of him to the world. A man cannot speak to a mothers loss. No man knows her heart at the loss of a child. She did her heroic son a disservice by her silence. She should have uncovered her head and her heart to be the American mother you claim. And last if all….you dared to flash your picket Constitution and ask if Trump has read it. I dare to ask you, Sir….HAVE YOU READ IT? If you say yes, then I dare ask you HOW you could represent that party? HOW can you support this woman? How can you affiliate your family with a party and candidate that cannot even call the radicals that killed your son what they are? How can you support a current administration that diminishes your son’s death by denying he had an enemy? And if you have read our Constitution, how could you cover your soulmate in colorful submissive sheets and have the audacity to speak FOR her? Your son died for that Constitution you so carelessly waved around on national TV in support of the very party that exists to destroy it. As a soldier’s mother….NO ONE could ever speak for me. I find your outrage artificial. I find your party affiliation offensive. I find your wife’s silence atrocious and offensive. I find YOU a political FOOL. I find your son to have been your greatest accomplishment, and you, Sir, have dishonored him. I hope you memorize that picket constitution so you will understand what it means to be a REAL American and hero. You are not one. You were USED. Your son WOULD NOT be proud of you. My only hope is that when MY son goes a fourth time to combat radical Islamic terrorist’s, ( and he WILL) he will know that his mother never stood submissively SILENT about an American hero. Yes, your son was a hero that could not be manipulated but, you, Sir, are a weak minded FOOL. I would love to hear your thoughts this morning about the 1500 American soldiers on the air base in Turkey being held as basic hostages as I type. Not a word from this president or party you adore…or the media that so thoroughly manipulated and used you and your wife. So…what say you Sir??? What will you say to a Blue and Gold Star family if these heroes die? In my opinion, you will say NOTHING.

Turns out ...

Lindsay Perigo's picture

... that filthy Muslim is a Sharia-touter:


Am I right in suspecting that

Olivia's picture

Am I right in suspecting that Trump should dump Manafort and reinstate Cory? He seems to have lost his mojo since Cory left.

It's since Manafort that Trump is using terms like Radical Islamic Terrorism and LGBTQ nonsense. He's obviously been told to use the PC terms, which doesn't suit him. He used to say "muslims" and "gays".


Lindsay Perigo's picture

Just watched Crooked Clit with Chris Wallace. Sinking feeling. Crooked is going to wipe the floor with Trump simply because she can string sentences together and she has mastered details. Trump doesn't even seem to know, much less care, that Putin annexed Crimea.

I wish he had the courage of his Political Incorrectness. And the knowledge of it. And the coherence of it. He should have come out swinging against that filthy Muslim who attacked him at the DNC, not made half-hearted comments about the silent wife. I fear the filthy Muslim was right—Trump has not read the Constitution. If he had, he'd know it doesn't apply to hostile aliens and would say so.

The worst possible candidate. Apart from all the others.

Am I right in suspecting that Trump should dump Manafort and reinstate Cory? He seems to have lost his mojo since Cory left.


Lindsay Perigo's picture

Question for the ARI-watchers here: when Trump announced Pence as his Veep, did the usual suspects shriek about an imminent Christian theocracy? I'd be agreeably surprised if they didn't.

Hilary is evil, Trump is not

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

As I posted recently, our age is defined by the love of the evil for being the evil. Trump is not equal to this. He is clueless as to what's going on. He buckles when the PC brigade, mainly twot-touters, screech and scream.

Trump is not evil. That is an important point. This "Trump = fascism" crap from Objectivists is mindless. Trump is actually a heroic man with good intentions. Yes he desires power, but for him it is the power to lead and problem solve. He is the businessman that thinks superior management skills and a no-bullshit attitude can make the American welfare state work. He's wrong but he is not evil.

As usual, Objectivists can't analyze political or cultural trends to save their lives.


Brook is going off the deep end. The Objectivist elite are a spectacle. If I were a young man today living in the era of the SJW cultural Marxist war against white males and I heard a top representative of Objectivism saying that Ayn Rand would vote for a woman President... I would be disgusted. What is he trying to show? That Objectivism will help achieve Leftist ends? That Objectivism is really about egalitarian outcomes? That men and women are the same? That last is NOT something that Rand believed in. And she explicitly stated that no healthy woman would want to be President. And she was right.

But this is just the blank slate view of human nature surfacing again as it always does with Objectivists. And that is my biggest problem with the entire philosophy.

No ...

Lindsay Perigo's picture

It's more than just that Bernie is "tired." He's being bribed or blackmailed or both. Crooked Clitoris is beyond corrupt. She's a murderer and a treasonist. Lower even than Obamuslim. I don't think we've seen anyone this evil in our lifetimes. The worst thing, she's so unabashedly evil, and everyone just laps her up (what a revolting thought when she prances around in her grotesque, twot-revealing pant-suits). As I posted recently, our age is defined by the love of the evil for being the evil. Trump is not equal to this. He is clueless as to what's going on. He buckles when the PC brigade, mainly twot-touters, screech and scream. Americastan, here we come! What an irony, given how Muslims mutilate twots. But utterly deserved. Americastan, I mean. I hope every Trump-denouncer, and every Islamapologist everywhere, gets what he or she deserves at the hands of Islamofilth. Especially OrgOists like Yawon! Karma!!

Hillary is a lesbian...

Olivia's picture

no man would want to sleep with her. A bottomless, empty pit. A vagina with teeth.

As Trump likes to point out, Bernie, like Jeb, just looks exhausted. Those Ugly wimmin run the whole Dem-scum ship and think that it's their time. My god, they'll be incurably bitter when they lose to Trump! (If it's possible for them to be anymore bitter than they are already.) They'll be suicidal sour-pussies.

Ayn Rand Would Vote For A Women Presidnet

Neil Parille's picture

Yaron punks out. Doesn't even care if a "phag" is a US president. Maybe he should study "filospfy" more.


At 33 mins.

Walter Block . . .

Neil Parille's picture

talks about Murray Rothbard and Ayn Rand:


A puzzle

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Why did Bernie capitulate so cravenly, especially after it had just come out that Weaselmanshits and Clitoris had been conspiring illicitly against him?

See this:

Bernie's wife looks like a lesbian. So does Hillary. Are they having an ugly wimmin's affair?!

OH Shudder!!

Olivia's picture

You know how Boris Johnson said of Clinton that she was like a Sadistic Nurse in a Mental Hospital?
I just saw a snippet of her speech where she is dressed in white snarling "Deeeaaal meee iiiiiinnn!" - and my hair stood on end from skincrawling, creepy malevolence!! The stuff of an awful nightmare from One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.

Well observed Boris! Please don't ever apologise for it.

Thanks LWF!

Olivia's picture

That means a lot coming from the finest investigative journalist and writer/broadcaster this country has ever blacklisted. Eye

Yes, Dem-scum on steroids - fit for the Olympics. Vomit-inducing.

Exceptional writing, Lady S!

Lindsay Perigo's picture

A devastating critique of a repulsive reptile.

My TV has been off all week—just can't bring myself to watch such a steady parade of Dem-scum filth.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.