Make Western Civilisation Great Again!

Lindsay Perigo's picture
Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Thu, 2016-12-29 04:25

Undeniably, the biggest events of 2016, seismic in their enormity, were Brexit and the election of Donald Trump. Because of those two events, for the first time in eight years we could say that Western Civilisation had rallied to mount a rearguard action against The Anti-West, aka Islamo-Marxism, aka The Filth. The latter were in pouting, infantile retreat, alternately sullen and hysterical, unable to comprehend that the seeming hegemony of their loathsome, totalitarian world view was not invincible after all.

Here in New Zealand, an eight-year non-event named John Key stood down as Prime Minister. He hadn't been that bad, but he hadn't been that good, either. He could have been a lot better. It turns out he simply couldn't be bothered; better as far as he was concerned just to coast and be "cool." Key's place was taken by Bill English—which means for the first time in the history of the world there's a Prime Minister named English who cannot speak it. Neither he nor his deputy nor his predecessor; fry-quacking and droning are "cool," and as ubiquitous as they are despicable. This is one respect in which Western Civilisation has yet to mount a comeback. May it enlist a Benedict Cumberbatch in a crusade for speech worthy of human beings, not ducks. Let it be cool to be clear. Make speaking great again!

Right at the end of 2016, New Zealand disgraced itself by joining such illustrious members of The Anti-West as China and Venezuela in condemning Israeli settlements on the West Bank. Now we learn that Foreign Minister Murray McCully was up to his Machiavellian eyeballs in drafting the pro-terrorist resolution. I hereby indict Mohammed McCully as a card-carrying member of The Filth.

If the resurgence of the West is to proceed apace in 2017, the new POTUS must move expeditiously to withdraw from the United Nations and banish Islamo-Marxism's single biggest repository from American soil (some wags are suggesting he could turn it into condos!). This may be too much to hope for, but we thought that of Brexit and Trump's election. Maybe, in Trump's words, we should get used to the idea of winning for a change. Certainly, Trump's pre-inaugural Twitter-rumblings about the UN are grounds for optimism.

NATO should declare war on every Muslim entity—be it nation or group or self-proclaimed caliphate—that has declared and/or is waging war on the West. Trump should reinstate the original version of his immigration proposal—"complete and total shutdown of Muslim immigration," i.e., the Not One Muslim policy first proposed by me here on SOLO before Trump announced it as his!—rather than the diluted one that he's allowed to be foisted upon him by wet useful idiots. All civilised nations should do the same. We can worry about exemptions and waivers once Not One Muslim has become our official default position.

We must drain the swamp of Fifth Columnists in our midst, the swamp of Academia. Academia, where they see sexists, misogynists, racists, etc., in, on and under every bed yet are indifferent when one of their own calls for "white genocide." To mix metaphors here, the cancer of Cultural Marxism/Political Correctness must be excised. While The Filth are entitled to their views (even as they seek to ban free speech in their "safe zones" and beyond), they are not entitled to indoctrinate their charges with those views at taxpayer expense. They and those of their charges they've stupefied into, like, total, like, incoherence, the, like, moronnials who cannot, like, string a, like, sentence together, let alone, like, think, like, conceptually, must be disenfranchised by a political literacy test. The same test would undoubtedly disqualify most of The Anti-West masquerading as journalists in the mainstream media, another swamp we must drain. Airhead America and their equivalents must never be allowed to destroy the best traditions of their respective nations by sheer weight of numbers.The fact that advanced, industrialised and still-relatively-free nations have warts should not deter them from excising their cancers. Excise warts by all means, but go after cancers first!

These are some of the challenges a resurgent Western Civilisation faces. It has faced them before and triumphed, even when the odds seemed hopeless. Right is might when it rediscovers the courage of its convictions.

As the President-elect prepares to open this most momentous chapter in his remarkable life, let the human, as opposed to sub- and pre-human world adopt as its New Year's Resolution:

Make Western Civilisation Great Again!!

A KASS New Year to you all!


Breed like rabbits

Bruno Turner's picture

We all know this nonsense about not having children is aimed exclusively at Europeans (in the Old world, the New, and Oceania).

While these self-hating bastards sell us the lie that we are evil (by accident of birth, white = bad), they tell us we must have open immigration because there are not enough of us for our own job market! "Ci pagheranno le pensioni" they tell Italians [they will pay your old pensions! i.e. social security].

The government of Poland said it best: "breed like rabbits!"

Yes. Yes. Yes. Let's breed indeed. We don't need "cultural enrichment" to survive.

As for "saving the Earth", why don't they promote having fewer children in Africa?

They know perfectly well that Europeans are having miniscule amounts of children, well below the replacement rate.

Don't take my word for it. Read about yourself:

"More than half of global population growth between now and 2050 is expected to occur in Africa," says the United Nations report. "Of the additional 2.4 billion people projected to be added to the global population between 2015 and 2050, 1.3 billion will be added in Africa."

After 2050, Africa is projected to be the only major area that has a continually growing population, meaning that it will house 25% of the global population in 2010 and 39% in 2100.  

In 1950, only 9% of the world's population was African.

Conversely, Europe is projected to have a smaller population in 2050 than in 2015. 

Link: http://www.businessinsider.com...

The environmentalist agenda is an instrument for what used to be called Internationalism, now Globalism (the globalists call it Global "Governance").

How to enslave the world as fast as possible? Stop rebellious libertarian cultures from breeding, have them run over by barbarians, establish "global governance" through "carbon taxes" and the like.

Perfect plan. Except... Nigel Farage and Donald Trump have been gifted to us by Providence.

Destroy the Paris Climate Accord. Leave the European Union. Build the Wall. Wunderbar!

"Sci. proves kids bad for Earth. Morality suggests stop having."

Ed Hudgins's picture

Science proves kids are bad for Earth. Morality suggests we stop having them.

Lest anyone forget that we are in a literal life and death struggle with our would-be destroyers of civilization, here is suicide sold as virtue from morally-warped, degenerate human-haters. Let this sick crap sink in and renew your commitment to life on this earth, not beneath it.

Know what you call it when you put earth over people? A mass grave, literally and figuratively.

At communist centenary, many Americans still believe in collecti

Ed Hudgins's picture

My latest:

At communist centenary, many Americans still believe in collectivism
By Edward Hudgins
November 7, 2017

November 7 marks a century since the founding of one of the most murderous tyrannies in human history. Russia's communist empire was an appalling failure in every way, yet we often see the hammer and sickle, the symbol of the Soviet Union, carried on college campuses and at protests around the country. Communism still holds sway among a significant part of the U.S. population.

In 1917, Russia was ruled by a powerful tsar. But in the preceding decades, reformers had been chipping away at the feudal system, which was all Russia had ever known. More democratic and free-market ideas were taking hold. Most of the peasant masses, however, were still impoverished, and millions of Russian men were being used as cannon fodder in World War I. The process of change accelerated in March 1917, when reformers forced the tsar to cede power.

Elections were planned for a democratic assembly, the Duma.

The Bolsheviks, however, had been agitating and organizing an alternative to the democratic reformers. Led by Vladimir Lenin, this group of communists staged a coup on Nov. 7, 1917.

What followed was not an open society with economic opportunity and democratic institutions, much less a workers' paradise. Far from it. The communists could not sustain an economy. The regime engineered a catastrophic famine deliberately to starve to death millions of small farmers, who, the communists feared, could resist the regime's confiscation of their land. Millions more innocent people were murdered by firing squads or worked to death in the Gulag slave labor camps.

The Soviet Union was the first modern totalitarian regime. Private life and private enterprise were forbidden. Everything was political. Spies were everywhere, watching for any deviation from dogma in thought or deed. From its inception to its 1991 demise, the Soviet regime murdered 50 million individuals, according to the best estimates. Other communist regimes established, abetted, or inspired by the Soviet Union – in China, Cambodia, North Korea – brought the body count as high as 150 million.

In the United States today, the media rightly deplore and ostracize bigoted brutes who march under the swastika. When Antifa thugs parade under the hammer and sickle and do violence to peaceful demonstrators, however, they are commonly given a chorus of approval or at least tolerance among the nation's elites, who profess to disagree with their tactics while honoring their intentions: achievement of "social justice," which translates to socialism under ironhanded rule by elites.

Three insights help explain this morally sick phenomenon.

First, communism is a collectivist ideology. It puts the group – in this case, the so-called proletariat of downtrodden workers – ahead of the individual, and it characterizes all social life as a war between rich and poor. The individual is routinely sacrificed for the good of society, often fatally. Whereas, historically, Americans defended free association among individuals – family, friends, social organizations, and other components of civil society – today, many reject the nation's founding principle of free association and individual liberty and actively work to undermine all groups not created by the state.

Second, communism contains a strong element of envy. Instead of wanting to allow everyone to proper, communism and its little brother, socialism, works to pull down those who already prosper. "Take from the one percent!" they shout. Or the 10 percent. Or the 20 percent. Never mind that allowing people to retain their wealth creates greater wealth that benefits everybody, resulting in the most prosperous society the world has ever known. Instead, a large class of privileged ingrates enjoys the riches created by others even as their ugly, angry, tear-it-down envy, combined with collectivist dogma, drives their denunciations of the creators of the system, their guilt-tripping against productive individuals, and their condemnation of entire ethnic groups for their "shameful" history of productive virtues. These malcontents share the motives of the Marxists, who, a century ago, sought to destroy not only feudal oligarchs, but also entrepreneurial wealth-creators.

A third insight is that a long-term communist strategy is in full operation in this country. Italian communist Antonio Gramsci in the early twentieth century explained the importance of taking over a nation's culture to prepare the ground for political revolution. In the 1960s, the German red Rudi Dutschke called this the "long march through the institutions." Individuals who accept collectivist principles gradually become the politicians, entertainers, teachers, educators, lawyers, media moguls, and journalists who mold the culture and spread their values throughout society, strengthening their efforts by suppressing freedom of speech whenever they have the power to do so. Within a few generations, a country is ripe for a collectivist revolution.

Today, the United States is not in danger of becoming another Soviet Union. Yet cultural elites are steadily spreading the premise that we all owe allegiance first and foremost to one another, not to those whom we value and who enhance our flourishing, such as family and friends. This ultimately puts government at the head of everything, with claims that its activities represent some "general will" about the good of society. There is no private life. Everything is political.

On the one hundredth anniversary of the establishment of the Soviet tyranny, it is crucial that those of us who still live by American values – individual liberty, self-reliance, voluntary assistance to others, and limited government – understand the significance of some of our countrymen not abhorring the hammer and sickle as they do the swastika. We must devise our own "long march through the institutions" to preserve the values that make America great by allowing each individual to achieve his own greatness.
------
Edward Hudgins is research director for The Heartland Institute. In the last years of the Soviet regime, he helped organize and run free-market reform conferences behind the Iron Curtain.

For further reading:

Edward Hudgins, "Eastern Europe 20 Years Later", December 24, 2009.

Edward Hudgins, "The Berlin Wall Then and Now," November 5, 2009.

Ed_Moscow_1989_night
Me in Moscow December 1989 subverting the Evil Empire.

Trump's Speech-Writers vs. Trump Himself

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Trump is pretty damned good at selecting his speech writers! But in interviews and public conversations he gives no idea that he understands their ideas in the least. Why the hell can't these (secretly semi-libertarian) speech-writers teach him some stuff? Even primitive childish stuff? Even for a single hour (spread out over four 15-minute lessons maybe)? It would be far more than he understands and knows today. Puzzled

Sean, Paul Joseph and Some Sub-Humans

Lindsay Perigo's picture

The Filth—Exhibits A:

Reagan on Columbus

Lindsay Perigo's picture

How different from Obama/Hillary (as endorsed by Bwook) and the rest of The Filth:

Bwuno ...

Lindsay Perigo's picture

... you are clearly a wacist white supwemacist nationalist xenophobe Chwistian pwotectionist Islamophobe misogynist sexist homophobe blah blah blah.* Did you not hear Twump say "Amewica First" in that speech by "the villain of our time"?! How could you support *that*?

*At least, I hope you are! Eye Evil

Donny: Greatest tax cut ever

Bruno Turner's picture

After hearing this speech on "the biggest tax cut in US history" I think I'm about ready to move back across the pond. Spectacular speech by The Donald at the Heritage Foundation. Speech on American values, heritage and most of all economic prosperity.

edit of last post

Mark Hunter's picture

I can’t edit my post of a few minutes ago because, I guess, Ellliot replied in the meantime.

Years later --> Later
because it was only three years, maybe less.

You're misunderstanding his

Elliot Temple's picture

You're misunderstanding his point because you didn't read it.

Elliot,

Mark Hunter's picture

I already know why Columbus is a hero, I don’t need Reisman to explain it to me. And of course what he wrote was virtue signaling.

It’s fine that there’s a non-racist reason for admiring Christopher Columbus (I use “racist” in the sense Leftists do) but if Reisman wants to help save America he won’t do it by insinuating that a white country is “absurd.”

Refuse the crumbs these people allow you. If you want, read them very critically and get what you can out of it but as for me I would rather spend my time elsewhere.

Reisman and his wife were kicked out of ARI because they complained about Binswanger and Schwartz taking too much from the till, not for ideological reasons. Years later George Reisman was gung-ho for the Iraq invasion. These days he opposes immigration only to countries with masive welfare programs, otherwise – and he takes care to say this – he has no objection. His is the usual man as economic cipher view.

“The philosophy of individual rights and capitalism implies that foreigners have a right to come and to live and work here, i.e., to immigrate into the United States.” – George Reisman in “Immigration Plus Welfare State Equal Police State” on his blog in 2006.  Thanks a lot, George!

To his credit he did appear in a video interview hosted by Stefan Molyneaux, the well-known immigration patriot (of obnoxious manner but useful), on another subject (the free market vs. the Nazis). Brook or Binswanger would never allow themselves to associate with Molyneaux on any subject.

No preference for Europeans?

Bruno Turner's picture

How does Reisman suppose Western Civilization could have elsewise spread to America?

Not men but floating abstractions sailing across the pond?

Settlers. Colonizers. Explorers. Not "immigrants".

Bruno Turner's picture

Europeans were not "immigrants".

He's not virtue signaling,

Elliot Temple's picture

He's not virtue signaling, he's explaining there's a non-racist reason. Which there is. Some people don't know that.

He's acknowledging a standard view exists, mentioning it, and saying what he thinks of it (absurd), and being clear to differentiate his view from it.

If you read the post you'll see there's a good, important point to it.

Virtue signaling by

Mark Hunter's picture

Virtue signaling by Reisman:

“I consider Columbus to be the discoverer not because of any such absurd reason as a preference for Europeans over Asiatics ...”

at which point I quit reading.

great article on Columbus by

Elliot Temple's picture

great article on Columbus by George Reisman:

http://georgereismansblog.blog...

New World Discovery Day

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Ed Hudgins's Columbus Day essay above ends with:

"The clash between the cultures of pre-Columbian natives and European immigrants certainly produced injustices for natives. But it would have been unjust for those natives to expect the immigrants to hold themselves to the level of primitive cultures and beliefs. The true long-term tragedy is that so many of the descendants of the pre-Columbian peoples in North America ended up on reservations rather than integrated into a society that offers opportunities for each individual to excel.

"Columbus opened a whole new land for those who would tame nature and build a new, free, and prosperous nation. We should celebrate the opportunity for America that he gave us—not apologize for it."

Nice!

But maybe we should get rid of the name Columbus -- with all of its association with Columbus's rights-violating acts -- and instead call the holiday "New World Discovery Day" or some such.

Why Being an Introvert Is Actually the Biggest Blessing

Luke Setzer's picture

The Mill quote made me think of this new article:

https://www.popsugar.com/smart...

"Make no mistake — I fully understand the importance of maintaining human relations. I simply don't think our entire existence should hinge on it. ... Yet solo-shaming persists, because being alone — even for a little while — is perceived by some as unusual or, in lots of cases, wrong. ... The biggest misconception of all? That alone means lonely. ... And that's just it — I'm able to deal with my own thoughts, which I believe is something many people aren't capable of. I'm able to cultivate my independence, count on myself for anything and everything (including a good time!), and consciously reflect on my emotions and mental state."

What Western Civilisation is up against ...

Lindsay Perigo's picture

"The sort of persons whom not merely in books but in their lives, we find perpetually engaged in hunting for excitement from without, are invariably those who do not possess, either in the vigor of their intellectual powers or in the depth of their sensibilities, that which would enable them to find ample excitement nearer home."

John Stuart Mill was onto Zero-Attention-Span SJW moronnials in 1839! Excerpt from Thoughts on Poetry and Its Varieties.

The Warriors!

Olivia's picture

Making war on The Swamp. Gorka and Bannon (and painful ole vocal fry Laura).

YouTube = Anti-West

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Note the stellar example of a "noble savage" about 3' 50" in. Self-selected for virtue, no doubt:

Warning to Brits reading SOLO

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Reading SOLO might soon land you in jail for 15 years!

https://pamelageller.com/2017/...

integration contract

Brant Gaede's picture

will make the Muslims more dangerous in the aggregate.

--Brant
the Austrians are going to ride the tiger?

Western Cultural Self-Assertion

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Ed -- The philosophy, culture, and lifestyle of Western liberalism is fighting back a bit and somewhat defending itself in Austria. That's good to see. But it may be too little, too late. And the ultimate destroyers of Western liberalism in Austria aren't the Muslims -- they're the Austrians.

But consider the damage that has already been done, according to the article:

"Austria's Muslim population now exceeds 700,000 (or roughly 8% of the total population), up from an estimated 340,000 (or 4.25%) in 2001 and 150,000 (or 2%) in 1990, according to data compiled by the University of Vienna.

"The massive demographic and religious shift underway in Austria, traditionally a Roman Catholic country, appears irreversible. In Vienna, where the Muslim population now exceeds 12.5%, Muslim students already outnumber Catholic students at middle and secondary schools. Muslim students are also on the verge of overtaking Catholics in Viennese elementary schools.

"At the same time, Austria has emerged as a major base for radical Islam. Austria's Agency for State Protection and Counterterrorism (BVT) has warned of the 'exploding radicalization of the Salafist scene in Austria.' Salafism is an anti-Western ideology that seeks to impose Islamic Sharia law."

Western Civilization needs a pure liberal revolution!

Austria: Integration Law Goes into Effect

Ed Hudgins's picture

An interesting approach:

The new law also requires immigrants from non-EU countries to sign an "integration contract" which obligates them to learn written and spoken German and to enroll in courses about the "basic values of Austria's legal and social order." Immigrants are also required to "acquire knowledge of the democratic order and the basic principles derived from it."

Austria: Integration Law Goes into Effect
"Integration through performance"

Neil

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

Thanks for this video. I was just recently watching a video of Gary North's views of social morality being based on Biblical Law. I hold to a different view but these Christian libertarians or Conservatives can be very knowledgable. The older I get the more I value knowledge and erudition over blind ideology as demonstrated by OrgOists.

Speaking of OrgOists, Aquinas was better on immigration than anyone in the ARI. And he didn't even have the benefit of having access to Rand's view of concept formation. Crazy.

Thomas Aquinas On Immigration

Neil Parille's picture

I confess that I haven't read the primary sources, but The Theologian was excellent -- and I doubt he was even talking about Islamic immigration:

Outstanding post!

Triassic's picture

A wonderful post, Lindsay!

I too see Key as a "what could have been" leader. He could and should have done *vastly* better. Out-of-control local government spending has remained untouched. Welfare numbers (while down in some categories) could have been dropped further. The things that angered me most of all, though, were his pathetic cave-in on "refugees" and now his (and McCully's) unforgivable action against Israel. I am convinced that Key stood down because he knew this was happening and he didn't want a poo-stain on his record. Too bad - he has one anyway.

This country *desperately* needs a "damn the torpedoes" leader. Someone who knows damned well the huge dangers that Islam (and socialism) pose to the West and someone who would act against them. Someone like Geert Wilders or the wonderfully-outspoken Hungarian PM Viktor Orban.

Arise

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

I think the West and world is rising. Some elements of the Brexit and Trump movements are quite hopeful. But more important than changing the politics of current mankind is changing its philosophy. Monotheism, welfare statism, and the self-sacrifice they both love (which I call "the religio-socialist ethic") need to be crushed. Let all our new intellectual theories be based upon solid reason and verifiable science. Hopefully soon Western Civilization will be more civilized than ever.

My ideal is to go to war to

Andrew Atkin's picture

My ideal is to go to war to the end of achieving the enforcement of basic human rights - universally, world over.

But I suppose that, by default, would mean going to war with much of the Islamic world. So be it.

The truth is, until we create a world where people stop abusing their children, we will always have barbarians at our gates that we have to worry about and deal with. We need to stop this. And when we're dealing with countries that have backwards ideas and practices we should be proudly arrogant. Intrude and punish to stop honour killings and the like - if necessary. Let the savages know who's boss - if necessary.

Wonderful piece Lindsay!

Olivia's picture

a great and succinct overview of our current time. So good to see you rationally optimistic once again! Smiling

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.