Fifth (Filth) Column in Fox News

Lindsay Perigo's picture
Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Tue, 2017-06-20 07:46

It is claimed that Fox News is being groomed for a leftward lurch engineered by the sons of Rupert Murdoch, pussy-whipped as they allegedly are by their bimbo, fry-quacking, social-climbing, Politically Correct, Islamo-Marxist, floozie female spouses. Evidentiary exhibits cited include the firings of Roger Ailes and Bill O'Reilly. I do not know if the case stacks up. Ailes created a culture of naked, fry-quacking bimbos, and was thus arguably the victim of his own karma—naked, fry-quacking bimbos got him in the end. O'Lielly showed himself to be an opportunistic bloviator, as I've demonstrated on the site, and so I can't feel heartbreak at his demise—Tucker Carlson is much better. Hannity is still on the air notwithstanding a concerted effort by The Filth to take him down.

But what is one to make of something like this—a "story" posted on the Fox News website by one Andrew O'Reilly (no relation to Bill as far as I know) blathering about a rise in "Islamophobia" by "right-wing extremists"?!

This putrid PC piffle even cites a "study" by "scholars" whose full-time occupation apparently is chronicling the rise of "Islamophobia" in Europe.


What is really ominous is that this tripe, the sort of excrement one would expect to find on CNN, is published without a "comments" section, so humans are not able to call this Filth out on that page.

Sound the alarm wherever you can, SOLOists!


Bruno's picture

Fox News is just barely better than all the other Filth-News, dino-media.

Let me remind everyone of O’Sullivan’s Law: “Any institution that is not explicitly right wing will become left wing over time.”

Unlike the leftists, "conservative" or just simply common-sense American organizations tend to hire and accept people that disagree with them. This is a mistake. The left completely ostracizes, ridicules, and harshly condemns any and all those who oppose them. Clearly Fox News has been inflitrated by the Fifth/Filth column of fake-conservatives (cuckservatives), neo-cons, and all other kinds of milquetoast weasels.

Here's a study on just how negative the media coverage of the Donald J. Trump has been during his presidency:

"CNN and NBC struck a 93 percent negative tone on their Trump stories, with only 7 percent positive. CBS was third in the anti-Trump race, with a 91 to 9 ratio. And the pro-Trump Fox News? That network was 52 percent negative to 48 percent positive."

Fox News was ALMOST 50-50, but was still slightly bent towards NEGATIVE coverage of Trump. Is that what they're viewers want? I don't think so..


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.