The Face of Bwook/Binswanker's Obleftivist Open Immigwation Policy

Lindsay Perigo's picture
Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Sat, 2017-08-12 07:05

Islamofilth rolls up unchecked on a Spanish beach. "Self-selected for virtue," no doubt.

“Freedom of travel is a right. It is a right possessed by every human being, not just by Americans."

—Hawwy Binswanker, Obleftivist

"Those Muslims in Euwope are merely pests. The main thweat to Western Civilisation is Donald Twump."

"Evewyday Muslims are not a pwoblem. Stop being afwaid."

—Yawon Bwook, Obleftivist


The "Right to Travel"

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Binswanger's "right to travel" is rather strange. No-one has a right to invade or trespass upon another's private property. The individual does have some sort of right not to be trapped, or surrounded by private property and then locked in. But if a million or billion people decide to pool their private property, form a country, and then decide to keep Person X out, they certainly seem to have that right, even if the country is immense. Person X then has to charm his way in, and secure their voluntary assent -- not force his way in.

P.S. This issue is worth discussing and debating. But Randian traitor and scumbag, anti-Objectivist, cultist Binswanger probably forbids that with any Objectivist or intellectual of decent quality or integrity. Only pseudo-Objectivist zombies are allowed to "debate" him, evidently.

That's not the Pope ...

Lindsay Perigo's picture

... it's Yawon Bwook in dwag!

Assisted Undefended Invasion

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Bruno is right: The West is experiencing an Undefended Enemy Invasion which is assisted by local subverters/traitors and foreign enemies who are working together. For example: The Sanctuary City folks and Mexican gov't are cooperating in this Invasion of the U.S. Letting this happen is not a good immigration policy for the West to practice.

Boot licking? The pope does even worse

Bruno Turner's picture

Lest it be forgotten, the new "pope" (more like a marxist in disguise) goes as far as feet washing and kissing. How cute...

http://www.breitbart.com/natio...

Purposefully undefended invasion

Bruno Turner's picture

If only it were a simple case of Western countries not stopping an invasion!

As we see clearly with what the "non governmental organizations" in the Mediterranean sea, in conjunction with the Italian government (by orders of the EU), they are actively importing the invading force, giving them shelter, hand outs, and an all-round boot licking.

Terrorist Attack In Barcelona

Neil Parille's picture

If only the remnants of the phalange would stop killing people.

Undefended Invasion

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

I think an immigration policy which lets in low-quality, undermining barbarians and anti-freedom, treasonist savages should be described as Undefended Invasion. Or else Surrender. Or Suicide.

not on my property

Brant Gaede's picture

There are basically two types of property (referencing the U.S. for simplicity): public and private. The public is taken from the private and is de facto held in trust by the government. There is no right to immigrate onto private property and, by the stated metric, public property. The public property is derived from and secondary to the private.

Now, where is there a third type of property within the borders of the U.S. and what is its nature and why should anyone have the right to come from a foreign country against invitation onto any US property? And isn't it the job of the U.S. government to defend the U.S. borders and the lives and property therein?

If I invite a foreigner onto my property that invitation gets to be vetted by the government to make sure it's going to be a good guy for I have no practical moral and legal way to confine him to my property.

It's all a matter of national defense. We have it or we don't.

--Brant

According to Binswanger

Bruno Turner's picture

This is all perfectly A-Okay!

They have a right to travel don't they? They are exercising their right.

Seems to be. In fact, if you

Richard Wiig's picture

Seems to be. In fact, if you oppose it some libertarians consider you outright evil.

"It's really debatable that what's going on in Europe is bad and that open immigration would be even worse?"

It's true to a point that

Richard Wiig's picture

It's true to a point that freedom of travel is a right, but it should be obvious that it ends where the property of others begins if permission is not forthcoming.

Binswanger in 2015

Neil Parille's picture

. . . somewhat backed off his extreme open immigration ideas but said:

Is there a really dangerous threat to our safety from massive Muslim immigration, or is this a very minor issue compared to what’s going to happen to us from Islamic regimes abroad, with or without that immigration? People can certainly differ on these factual issues, and raw, statistical (!) facts are all we have left when we can’t appeal to principles, because the principled path is not “politically realistic.”

It's really debatable that what's going on in Europe is bad and that open immigration would be even worse?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.