Who's Online
There are currently 0 users and 7 guests online.
Who's New
Linz's Mario Book—Updated!PollCan Trump Redeem Himself Following His Disgusting Capitulation to the Swamp on the Budget?
No (please elaborate)
0%
Yes (please elaborate)
56%
Maybe (please elaborate)
44%
Who cares? (My blood doesn't boil and I'm a waste of space)
0%
Total votes: 9
|
The Islamic Prime Minister![]() Submitted by Ed Cline on Tue, 2018-06-05 06:51
The Islamic Prime Minister https://edwardcline.blogspot.c... I sent this query to Theresa May at 10 Downing Street, London, a few days ago:
From all the evidence of the imposition of speech controls on Britain imposed by May, impositions punishable with arrest and imprisonment if the controls are violated, one can only make an educated guess that she is a closet Muslim.Sharia law is in the cards. Recently, in the middle of last month, May answered a question in Parliament about freedom of speech as a “cherished” British liberty by qualifying her alleged value of it by stressing the role of “tolerance” as a kind of twin that puts a necessary gag the freedom. The implied object of the question was why criticism of Christianity was taken as a norm, but criticism of Islam was not. May answered:
Tolerance? Of what? Tolerance of Islam, to May, must mean not criticizing it or any of its primitive, medieval, and patently misogynic practices, such as FGM and rape at whim and by Koranic right. Throwing gays off of roofs. Jihad Watch cites a source of the Koranic sanction of rape:
What is said in the Koran about rape? On this subject Theresa May is definitely not an “Islamophobe.” She strikes one as a kind of “Aunt Edna,” a frumpish woman of conventional tastes and values, a second-hander to the core. The overriding value today is “diversity, which she endorses, and is a grab bag of cultural traditions and practices, for the sake of diversity, not letting one cultural tradition and practice become the norm in society. There is Iran, which has jailed women who refused or discarded their head scarves. Fox News reported that May did not wear a head scarf when she visited Saudi Arabia in 2017:
The photos showed May's ankles and wrists were covered. However, The Telegraph noted her outfit did not completely comply with Foreign Office guidelines: “Women should wear conservative, loose-fitting clothes as well as a full length cloak (abaya) and a headscarf.” But she certainly dons one when meeting with her British Muslim “subjects.” Her “diversity” sympathies do not extend to Iranian women protesting the hijab. The Arab News in January 2018 reported:
Theresa May invariably adopts a “What? Me, worry?” mien when the subject of Islamic brutality at home and abroad arises, which is daily. It isn’t happening to her. The brutality occurs in a reality remote from her bubble of “diversity,” so there is an unreality to it, and she will utter platitudes and bromides present in the taquiyya spiel that any “radicalized“ iman or mullah will concoct for public consumption. It is a “prime directive” of hers to defend and protect the Islamic faith at any cost, because the altruist “moral imperative” of tolerance-through-diversity commands it. All Britons must adhere to it, or else be labeled as bigoted racists (even though a smidgen of awareness will reveal that Islam is not a race). For all practical purposes, Theresa May is as Muslim as Sadiq Kahn, the mayor of London.
|
User loginNavigationMore SOLO StoreThe Fountainhead by Ayn Rand
Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand
|
Meanwhile in London
London police initiates manhunt for suspect named "Khan" (what a coincidence).
Woman and one year old child stabbed. Child remains in critical condition.
http://www.breitbart.com/londo...
Miss Theresa, "tolerance" is not a virtue, most certainly not in the streets of your own capital. What happens overseas must be of less interest than what is happening in the here and now within the (not so much anymore) blessed isle herself. Saudi Arabia shenanigans are fine and all, but mostly irrelevant when your own people are at risk at home.
She might want to read up on what the Empire used to do to colonial subjects who practiced barbaric practices in a certain subcontinent. So much for tolerance. What wasn't tolerated back then is actively protected today, and not overseas but within the nation itself.