Everybody's been so focused on the political side of Jordan Peterson, but of more importance, if one places politics downstream of such things, is his philosophical, Kantian side. Especially important, since some people have made the claim that Peterson was not philosophical. Recent tweets, related to his debate with Sam Harris, contradict that presupposition. Not only that, they show, as I've argued via his Jungian influence, that he's much influenced by Kant:

If values can be derived from facts, what role is left to play for the a priori structure of human consciousness? This question is what classically divides empiricists and rationalists. (And "none" is not the correct answer.) @SamHarrisOrg

— Jordan B Peterson (@jordanbpeterson) June 21, 2018

and

I polled people for topics to discuss with @SamHarrisOrg. #2 Define God. OK. God is that in which we manifest necessary faith. Necessary because interpretations have to start somewhere. This is Kant's objection to Hume's empiricism (an empiricism to which Harris adheres?)

— Jordan B Peterson (@jordanbpeterson) June 21, 2018

Well, then. That should make for some interesting discussion at OCON...