Hatred for the Caucasian

Bruno's picture
Submitted by Bruno on Mon, 2018-09-03 19:46

This new thread is dedicated to the racism Whites are subjected to in Western culture.

Its purpose is to expose anti-European racists and function as archive.

You may think of it is as the anti-white "Horror File" (à la Rand).


"Caucasian variety – I have taken the name of this variety from Mount Caucasus, both because its neighborhood, and especially its southern slope, produces the most beautiful race of men, I mean the David, MichelangeloDavid, Michelangelo Georgian; and because all physiological reasons converge to this, that in that region, if anywhere, it seems we ought with the greatest probability to place the autochthones of mankind." - Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, founding father of Anthropology.




50th Anniversary of Epic Racism!

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Ann Coulter
Wow. 50 years since the first white racists landed on the moon.

Wisdom in our roots

Bruno's picture

Stefan Molyneux explains what has made Europeans great, THE COLD, and how the welfare state mentality is the illusion of tropical abundance.

"Those of us who evolved in the West know this deep in our bones. There's an old saying, it goes all the way back to Ancient Greece. It goes a little something like this: even the Gods cannot break the rule; take what you want, and pay for it."

x2 More Christine Fair

Bruno's picture


A Georgetown University associate professor had a month-long meltdown after a Muslim woman explained why she voted for President-elect Donald Trump.

Asra Q. Nomani, a former Georgetown journalism professor and Wall Street Journal reporter, wrote an op-ed in The Washington Post Nov. 10 explaining why she, as a Muslim woman and “long-time liberal,” voted for Trump. “I support the Democratic Party’s position on abortion, same-sex marriage and climate change,” Nomani wrote. “But I am a single mother who can’t afford health insurance under Obamacare.”

C. Christine Fair, a previously “friendly colleague,” went on a 31-day screed against Nomani spanning across Twitter and Facebook. According to Nomani’s Dec. 23 follow-up complaint to the university, the “Peace and Security Studies” professor called her a “wretch,” “clueless dolt” and a fame-monger.

Fair also compared Trump to Adolf Hitler and asserted that Nomani’s vote for Trump “helped normalize Nazis in DC.” She didn’t clarify if she was referring to Trump supporters or actual Nazis marching the streets.


More Christine Fair

Bruno's picture

Distinguished Georgetown Prof Spreads Personal Info Of Political Opponents To Intimidate Them: https://www.mrctv.org/blog/dis...

A distinguished professor at Georgetown University runs a blog titled “Shit Men Say” where she publicizes the personal information of people who disagree with her online for the purpose of harassment and intimidation.

C. Christine Fair, a Provost’s Distinguished associate professor of security studies at Georgetown’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, started the blog “Shit Men Say” in January 2017. According to the description of the blog, Fair shares “snarcastic missives based upon the shit men (and sometimes women ) say to me via email, voicemail and comments ‘deposited’ on my various social media” on her page.

In Fair’s posts, she reveals messages she received online along with the personal information pertaining to the people who sent her the messages. She posts her victims’ social media URLs, photos (including family photos), full names, locations, addresses, work information, phone numbers, and email addresses...


In addition to simply posting personal information, Fair repeatedly shares her victims’ personal information by reblogging the posts so they will result in higher Google search results.

Fair’s Tumblr blog is connected to her Twitter account, which means when she posts someone’s personal information on Tumblr, it is also shared on Twitter.


Georgetown’s faculty handbook confirms the school prohibits harassment on the basis of political affiliation:

Harassment is a form of discrimination prohibited by law. It is the policy of Georgetown University to prohibit harassment on the basis of age, color, disability, family responsibilities, gender identity and expression, genetic information, marital status, national origin and accent, personal appearance, political affiliation, pregnancy, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, source of income, veteran’s status or other factors prohibited by federal and/or District of Columbia law (“Protected Categories”). Sexual harassment is addressed under the University’s Policy Statement on Sexual Misconduct.

Additionally, the harassment section of the faculty handbook explicitly states harassment can extend to online communications, including online communication intended to intimidate people:

Harassment may include, but is not limited to: verbal abuse or ridicule, including slurs, epithets, and stereotyping; offensive jokes and comments; threatening, intimidating, or hostile acts, and displaying or distributing offensive materials, writings, graffiti, or pictures. Harassment may include conduct carried out through the internet, email, social media, or other electronic means.

Fair appears to have been awarded her distinguished professor status for her “remarkable achievements” after she created her blog...

Georgetown University

Bruno's picture


C. Christine Fair, an associate professor at Georgetown in the School of Foreign Service, tweeted Saturday...


Look at thus chorus of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist’s arrogated entitlement.
All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes. https://t.co/tT7Igu157y

— (((Christine Fair))) (@CChristineFair) September 29, 2018

Georgetown University said Fair’s views are her own and “not the views of the University,” in a statement to The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“The views of faculty members expressed in their private capacities are their own and not the views of the University,” the university said. “Our policy does not prohibit speech based on the person presenting ideas or the content of those ideas, even when those ideas may be difficult, controversial or objectionable. While faculty members may exercise freedom of speech, we expect that their classrooms and interaction with students be free of bias and geared toward thoughtful, respectful dialogue.”

The Problem with Ann ...

Lindsay Perigo's picture

... is that she can't speak. In lieu of speech she makes those fry-quacking noises that most females around the world emit now in lieu of speech. Ann was on with fellow fry-quacker Laura the other day and the combination was beyond unendurable. All it needed was Ivanka Trump to make it a prosecutable crime against humanity.

Wimmin, even if they're not Ugly Wimmin but merely the faux blond bimbos so beloved of Fox (of whom the worst current example must be Jackie Ibanez?!) ought to be corralled under house arrest until they're taught how to speak like humans. Even then they should be let out extremely judiciously, since most of them really are as stupid as they sound. Exhibit A: Amy Peikoff, upward-inflecting nose-ringed Obleftivist.

No more Mr. White Guy

Bruno's picture

Ann Coulter: No More Mr. White Guy

“They know the optics of 11 white men questioning Dr. Ford … will be so harmful and so damaging to the GOP.” — Areva Martin, CNN legal analyst
“They understand that you have all of these white men who would be questioning this woman … the optics of it would look terrible.” — Gloria Borger, CNN chief political analyst

“Women across this nation should be outraged at what these white men senators are doing to this woman.” — Rep. John Garamendi, D-Calif.

“There has been some discussion of the GOP senators who happened to all be … white men.” — Jim Sciutto, CNN correspondent

“What troubles me is now there are … they’re all white men.” — Jennifer Granholm, former governor of Michigan, on CNN


In the history of the world, there has never been a more pacific, less rapey creature than the white male of Western European descent.

I realize it gives The New York Times’ editorial board (recent acquisition: Sarah Jeong) warm feelings every time someone throws in the word “white” as an intensifier, denoting extra hatefulness, but really, guys, it’s getting old.

Can we please, for the love of God, drop the painfully trite, mind-numbing cliche about “white men,” as if somehow their whiteness makes evil even eviler?

full article here: https://www.breitbart.com/big-...

National history can't exist without the nation

Bruno's picture

Latest statue removal in San Francisco shows what happens when the descendants of those who founded a nation get demographically displaced by immigrants and mentally brainwashed by internationalism and third-world'ism. Earlier this year the most-American holiday Columbus day was officially expunged as well.

San Francisco to remove 19th century statue some call racist

San Francisco board has voted unanimously to remove a 19th century statue that activists say is racist and demeaning to indigenous people.

The unanimous decision Wednesday night by the San Francisco Board of Appeals involves the “Early Days” statue, which depicts a Native American at the feet of a Spanish cowboy and a Catholic missionary. It is part of a group of statues near City Hall that depict the founding of California.


Earlier this year, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted to end the Columbus Day holiday and celebrate indigenous people and Italian Americans on the second Monday of October.


Full article here: https://apnews.com/7d251a649a4...

Sins of the father

Bruno's picture

NASCAR Xfinity’s Conor Daly loses sponsorship over father's resurfaced N-word slur

Lilly Diabetes has parted ways with driver Conor Daly ahead of his NASCAR debut after reports surfaced that his father, Derek Daly, a retired Indy 500 and Formula One driver, used the N-word during an interview in the 1980s.

On August 24, the pharmaceutical company announced they would be ending the sponsorship of the 26-year-old driver ahead of the NASCAR Xfinity race scheduled for August 25.


In a statement, the elder Daly said he admitted to using a racial slur for African-Americans during a radio interview in the early 1980s. Derek Daly, who had just moved to the United States then, said the term had a different meaning and connotation in his native Ireland. He said was "mortified'" when he learned how the term was used in the United States and has never used it since then.


Continued here: http://www.foxnews.com/auto/20...

From Derek Daly's statement:

In the early 80’s, after I had recently relocated to the United States, I was interviewed by radio reporter Larry Henry and I was asked about my situation with my new American team. I responded by explaining that I was a foreign driver now in America, driving for an American team, with an American crew, and with an American sponsor – and that if things did not go well, the only ‘n’ in the wood pile” would be me. At the time, I meant that I, as the new foreigner on the team, would shoulder the blame and I would be the scapegoat. This was not in any way shape or form meant to be a racial slur. This phrase was commonly used in Ireland, Britain, and Australia.

When I used that phrase in the early 80’s, I had no idea that in this country that phrase had a horribly different meaning and connotation, as it was commonplace in Ireland. After moving to the United States, I quickly learned what a derogatory term it was. When I was first informed of this, I was mortified at the offense I might have caused people. I have therefore never used the word since. I made this mistake once, but never again.

The news is not that this company broke its sponsorship ties with the driver. The news is that what his father said in the 1980's, which was not meant as hateful either, is reason enough in this "culture" of ours to justify a public hate campaign against his son, big enough so that he loses an important sponsor.

US Kangaroo court officially condones violence

Bruno's picture

Charlottesville Jury Fines Man $1 for Punching White Nationalist


[W]inder was among the protesters who showed up to stop Kessler from making a statement, punching him in the back of the head as others booed and shouted over him.

Winder faced a maximum possible sentence of a year in jail and a $2,500 fine for the punch, which was caught on tape by the local NBC affiliate. He appealed his misdemeanor assault conviction, and while the jury upheld the guilty verdict, they determined that he should serve no jail time and should only be fined $1, sending a clear message that Winder was justified in lashing out at Kessler.


Mother Jones published “The Long History of ‘Nazi Punching,’” and ParentMap considered the question, “My Son Wants to Punch Nazis — Should I Let Him?” Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Žižek weighed in, and Cato Institute in Washington, D.C. conducted a survey to gauge public opinion (68 percent overall said it’s not OK to punch Nazis, but 51 percent of those who identified as “strong liberals” said it is.) But despite the mind-boggling volume of commentary on the matter, the debate was, unsurprisingly, never settled. Until Tuesday, when it seems this Charlottesville jury made an official ruling: Yes, punch away.


Continued here: https://www.rollingstone.com/c...

You read that correctly, this jury just invited feral radical leftists to go ahead and indulge in their violent acts against what they claim are "nazis". Who's a nazi? Donald Trump has been called that and, worse, "literally Hitler".

Will the Left now feel entitled to punch the President of The United States?

This jury should be ashamed of itself, it is setting up a terrible precedent for the coming years.

White-only class: Learn to self-hate

Bruno's picture

University announces “White Awake” safe space for white students

The new group is now one of four in the university’s “Diversity Issues” program series


“This group offers a safe space for White students to explore their experiences, questions, reactions, and feelings,” the description explains. “Members will support and share feedback with each other as they learn more about themselves and how they can fit into a diverse world.”

The description asks students if they want to “improve [their] ability to relate to and connect with people different from [themselves]” or if they want to become a better “ally.” The new group is now one of four in the university’s “Diversity Issues” program series.

The group is being led by Noah Collins, who works for the UMD Counseling Center, and will be held once a week. Collins specializes in group therapy and is interested “especially in the areas of racial and cultural awareness,” according to his faculty bio.


Continues here: https://www.campusreform.org/?...

To become a better "ally" can mean nothing other than to become a more self-hating and more anti-white racist, under the guise of defending minorites from the evil White man. Becoming an "ally" to "POC" ("people of color") can easily be imagined to indicate becoming supportive of virulently hateful groups such as Black Lives Matter. I remind all that many a course are being taught as to how "systemic racism", "white privilige", and other linguistic left'isms, permeate the very air we breathe in the West: that is the context within which these courses are being taught.

Bigots? To the gulag ("re-educational")

Bruno's picture

Gulags were 'compassionate', 'educational' institutions, say trans rights campaigners


Trans rights campaigners at Goldsmiths University described the Gulags as benign places where inmates received education, training and enjoyed the opportunity to take part in clubs, sports and theatre groups.

The threat was made against Claire Graham, a special education needs teacher, who wrote objecting to LGBTQ Goldsmith’s threat to target feminist academics who they claimed were prejudiced against transgender individuals

Goldsmith LGBTQ subsequently attempted to justify the threat to send Ms Graham to the Gulag by stating that “sending a bigot to one is actually a compassionate, non-violent course of action.”


More: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/ne...

No news on whether this "LGBTQ" group has been banned by the uni or not. I doubt anything substantial will be done. Whoever is behind the tweets is obviously unfit to be anywhere near a classroom, whether on one side or the other of the teacher's desk.

This is what radical leftists will do to "feminist academics" who do not bow to "trans activist" demands, it doesn't take much imagination to see what will be done to straight White men who love their countries and their culture and express the wish to preserve the West from further erosion.

BLM demands

Bruno's picture

"Black Lives Matter" Louisville leader Chanelle Helm has 10 demands of white people:

"1. White people, if you don’t have any descendants, will your property to a black or brown family. Preferably one that lives in generational poverty.

2. White people, if you’re inheriting property you intend to sell upon acceptance, give it to a black or brown family. You’re bound to make that money in some other white privileged way.

3. If you are a developer or realty owner of multi-family housing, build a sustainable complex in a black or brown blighted neighborhood and let black and brown people live in it for free.

4. White people, if you can afford to downsize, give up the home you own to a black or brown family. Preferably a family from generational poverty.

5. White people, if any of the people you intend to leave your property to are racists assholes, change the will, and will your property to a black or brown family. Preferably a family from generational poverty.

6. White people, re-budget your monthly so you can donate to black funds for land purchasing.

7. White people, especially white women (because this is yaw specialty — Nosey Jenny and Meddling Kathy), get a racist fired. Yaw know what the fuck they be saying. You are complicit when you ignore them. Get your boss fired cause they racist too.

8. Backing up No. 7, this should be easy but all those sheetless Klan, Nazi’s and Other lil’ dick-white men will all be returning to work. Get they ass fired. Call the police even: they look suspicious.

9. OK, backing up No. 8, if any white person at your work, or as you enter in spaces and you overhear a white person praising the actions from yesterday, first, get a pic. Get their name and more info. Hell, find out where they work — Get Them Fired. But certainly address them, and, if you need to, you got hands: use them.

10. Commit to two things: Fighting white supremacy where and how you can (this doesn’t mean taking up knitting, unless you’re making scarves for black and brown kids in need), and funding black and brown people and their work.

#RunUsOurLand #Reparations #YouGonLearnToday #RunUsOurMoney"

She then provides various methods for you to send her money, which you can find for yourself if you are interested, so you can send this lovely lady the reparations she obviously deserves.


Grant Jones's picture

In academia it's "kill the White Devil" 24/7/365. These dens of evil and racism need to be shut down.

It's Not OK to Be White

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Screeching Ugly Wimmin and pathetic neutered men of the kind beloved of Obleftivists are confronted by humans:

Obvious and Unknown

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

The truth is so obvious here I never quite know what to say. Virtually everyone on earth today seems to be a radical liar or evader. But here's the blatant and undeniable truth about Western Civilization:

Bigotry today is that which is practiced by blacks -- not whites. Bigotry today is that which is practiced by women -- not men. Modern racists are virtually all black and modern sexists are virtually all women. Or, at the least, whites and males are the targets of systematic, and wildly unjustifiable, abuse and hatred. So why in hell don't whites and males stand up for themselves and fight back by stating the obvious truth?

Ah, but that's the power of philosophy, isn't it? If you don't have philosophy on your side, then even the blatant and undeniable truth becomes impossible to know or say. The novel 1984 was right.

Critical whiteness studies

Richard Wiig's picture

Critical whiteness studies are now at Melbourne University.


gregster's picture

Dan believes in anthropogenic global climate change. That shows you his level.

Dan Edge

Richard Wiig's picture

Tolerating racism?

Rutgers anti-white-women

Bruno's picture

Linzio, here's more by Rutgers from earlier this year. White women are being racist by being women.

Rutgers prof: White women voted for Trump because ‘sex difference is itself a racial structure'

A Rutgers University women’s and gender studies professor thinks she has the answer to why white women seemingly voted against their interests in the 2016 presidential and last month’s Alabama US Senate elections.

“Simply put,” Kyla Schuller writes in a guest post for the Duke University Press blog, “sex difference is itself a racial structure.”

[Excerpt from Schiller's post below]

The primitive races, by contrast, were cast as unsexed, as insufficiently evolved in both anatomy and character. The category of womanhood emerged in modern times as a unique quality of civilization. Its ramifications are still visible in electoral politics across the country.

The Biopolitics of Feeling uncovers the foundational role of sex difference to biopower. It unearths how sex difference functioned as a key technology of biopower’s racializing structures, which operate to choose some members of the population for life and cast others into disposability and death. Sex difference helped qualify individuals for life. I reveal how the position of the feminine was carved out not only to exemplify social evolutionary achievement, but also to protect it. Scientists identified the key quality of the civilized body to be its impressibility, or the capacity to be affected over time. Receptivity to sensory impressions determined a body’s capacity for growth, mental development, and even, in this Lamarckian and pre-genetic era, the transmission of acquired characteristics to descendants. Impressibility thus served as the ontological basis of progress. Impressibility also, however, entailed a frightening vulnerability to influence and environment, rendering the civilized body in need of careful protection.

Continued here:

In other words, the white man's Civilization "invented" womanhood, and white women thus are conditioned to vote in favor of the white man's interests. Incredible! Thank goodness for our ancestors!


i.am.dan.edge's picture

You know you're not white, right? Looking a little brown to me. Yesterday's "undesirables" become today's supremacists. Ooo baby, it's a wild world.

You love your child more than someone else's? You're racist!

Bruno's picture

How Well-Intentioned White Families Can Perpetuate Racism

The sociologist Margaret Hagerman spent two years embedded in upper-middle-class white households, listening in on conversations about race.

By Joe Pinsker, for The Atlantic


Pinsker: Some of the parents in your book may see the problems with choosing mostly white neighborhoods or schools, but the explanation they usually provide for those choices is that they just want what’s best for their children. This rationale is generally considered understandable, even honorable, but can you talk about its dark side?

Hagerman: One of the things I talk about in the book is what I call this “conundrum of privilege,” which is that these parents have a lot of resources economically as well as status as white people. They can then use those resources to set up their own child’s life in ways that give them the best education, the best health care, all the best things. And we have this collectively agreed-upon idea in our society that being a “good parent” means exactly that—providing the best opportunities you can for your own child.

But then some of these parents are also people who believe strongly in the importance of diversity and multiculturalism and who want to resist racial inequality. And these two things are sort of at odds with one another. These affluent white parents are in a position where they can set up their kids’ lives so that they’re better than other kids’ lives. So the dark side is that, ultimately, people are thinking about their own kids, and that can come at the expense of other people’s kids. When we think about parents calling up the school and demanding that their child have the best math teacher, what does that mean for the kids who don’t get the best math teacher?

Pinsker: What would it look like for a white affluent parent to make a choice not to give their children “the best”? Is it a matter of not calling the school to get the best math teacher? Or is there a more proactive thing a parent might be able to do?

Hagerman: I think part of it is how we choose to define “the best.” Some of the parents in my book, they rejected the idea that their child needed to be in all the AP classes. They valued other elements of their children’s personalities, such as their concerns about ethics or fairness or social justice. There were a handful of parents in my study who resisted having a separate track for AP students, for example, which can sometimes be a segregating force within schools.


Continued here:

In other words, in order to be socially just, you must sacrifice the future of your children for the good of someone else's children, and more specifically for children who are not white, else you are perpetuating racism and white privilige, you unaware bigot.

This is plain, naked, self-sacrificial altruism, collectivist racism, self-hatred, and self-flagellation.

End of the Road

i.am.dan.edge's picture

So this is the sad end to SOLO's long and winding road. Born of division, rising to a popular open forum for ideas, collapsing under the weight of animosity, and finally sinking into a small circle of folks facing inward, toleraring naked racism.

Although I have left Objectivism behind, I still have love for those I had the honor to get to know over the years. I have love for all of you, but I'm very sad that your road has led you here.

--Dan Edge

New Hampshire? Too White!

Bruno's picture

"New Hampshire, 94 Percent White, Asks: How Do You Diversify a Whole State?"; By Katharine Q. Seelye for the New York Times

[Bold has been added] [Comments have been added within these brackets]

Catalina Celentano used to hold training sessions for hospital workers in Lynn, Mass., to familiarize them with the cultures of patients from Cambodia, Russia and the Dominican Republic. When she moved to New Hampshire, she suddenly found herself in an ethnic vacuum.

“I went from being able to speak Spanish every day to not speaking Spanish at all because there wasn’t anybody to speak Spanish to,” said Mrs. Celentano, who was born in Colombia to a Colombian mother and Hungarian father. “The only person I spoke Spanish with was a cleaning lady and she moved back to Colombia.”

New Hampshire, like its neighbors Vermont and Maine, is nearly all white. This has posed an array of problems for new arrivals, who often find themselves isolated and alone, without the comfort and support of a built-in community. [Without ethnic ghettos you mean? In other words without sub-nations within the nation? Without non-Western cultures within the West?]


The issue prompted about 100 business leaders, government officials and members of nonprofit organizations to meet Thursday to search for ways that New Hampshire — which is 94 percent white — might lure other racial and ethnic groups [Diversity! Diversify! Diversify! White people are no good!], as well as younger people.


With nonwhites poised to make up a majority of the American population in the next three decades, he said, diversity has become a bottom-line imperative for companies competing for talent, especially for workers who can speak other languages. [Why speak other languages in America, if everyone is "integrating"? Don't they learn how to speak English? We need to make English the official language and put an end to this insanity] As it stands, New Hampshire is 3 percent Latino, 2 percent African-American and 3 percent Asian, according to the census, with some people identifying as more than one race. The nation as a whole is 17 percent Latino, 14 percent African-American and 6 percent Asian.


The gathering took place at the offices of Eversource, the energy company, where 17 percent of the company’s 8,000 employees are not white.

“We truly believe that this effort will be hugely beneficial to our business operations,” [Yes, I am sure you do believe it, your multicultural ideal is just as much faith-based as the most irrational sectarian cult] said Paula Parnagian , the diversity and inclusion manager for Eversource.

For Jerri Anne Boggis, executive director of the Black Heritage Trail of New Hampshire, in Portsmouth, N.H., the participation of major companies is a sign of the urgency of the mission. “It’s not just the social justice groups that are doing this, it’s the businesses,” [We know big business is deeply entrenched in social justicism, the rot is within and without] she said. “We’re talking about the economic engine of our state, and we can’t move forward without them.”


Part of the problem, Rogers J. Johnson, president of the Seacoast N.A.A.C.P., told the group, was “a lack of recognition as to the seriousness of this problem.” He said that many people in New Hampshire view race as an issue in the South but not in the North.

In workshops and panel discussions, people wrestled with ways New Hampshire could draw people of different backgrounds. Their suggestions included: a better understanding of licensing and skills that refugees bring with them [Yes, they bring such wonderful cultural enrichment! Just look at England, Germany, France, and Sweden! Bring them all in! Nothing to worry about at all, they will be our greatest strength!] so they could more easily work here; a system of rewarding businesses that hire a more diverse array of workers; a central location with a database, speakers’ bureau and training opportunities that could help companies understand what “diversity and inclusion” means and how it could benefit them, and a focus on keeping workers as much as hiring them in the first place, since many leave after finding the state inhospitable. [What's wrong with that? It's called the right of people to live as they please, according to their own cultural norms. If newcomers do not wish to integrate, they are free to leave! Just like so so so many of the 1900s European immigrants went back to Europe after they decided they did not like the culture in the USA.]


Continued here: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/0...

Yes, I am sure that "diversifying" your business is so crucial, on economic grounds. I am so totally convinced! - NOT!

Why do these busybodies believe they have the right to socially engineer society according to their twisted egalitarian ideals?

The American sense of life answers: leave us alone!

Deport The Fascist

Lindsay Perigo's picture

A quick search for Rutgers Funding brings up the following from its own website:

Where does our revenue come from?

The university receives revenue from the following public and private sources:

30 percent: Tuition and fees
20 percent: State appropriations and state-paid fringe benefits
19 percent: Patient care services
14 percent: Sponsored research (grants and contracts)
7 percent: Auxiliary enterprise
5 percent: Federal and state student aid
2 percent: Gifts and endowments
3 percent: Other

Perhaps a tiny portion of the federal and state largesse could be used to buy this creature a one-way ticket to a non-white country of its choice, thereby putting it out of its misery?

"Professors" nowadays are usually SJWs, preposterously young, stupid, illiterate, evil ... and tenured! Child-molesters of the mind. Some Pedagogical Cleansing is needed!

Rant and raves of a self-hating racist professor

Bruno's picture

Rutgers University professor James Livingston accused of racist rant against whites on social media, by Cheryl Makin for MyCentralJersey (USA Today network)

Another Rutgers University professor has taken to social media to rail against a race — in this case, his own.

In an expletive-laced rant, professor James Livingston complained about "little Caucasian a--holes" as part of a Facebook post Thursday evening.

Livingston, who is white, began his post saying, "OK, officially, I now hate white people."


"I am a white people [sic], for God’s sake, but can we keep them — us — us out of my neighborhood?," he said. "I just went to Harlem Shake on 124 and Lenox for a Classic burger to go, that would [be] my dinner, and the place is overrun with little Caucasian a**holes who know their parents will approve of anything they do. Slide around the floor, you little s**thead, sing loudly, you moron. Do what you want, nobody here is gonna restrict your right to be white."


Continued here:

Professor Livingston is apparently neither capable of forming a logical and grammatical sentence, nor realizing that by hating Whites as a whole he is hating on himself and will be incapable of maintaning a healthy self-esteem and psychological well-being.

How, and why, people such as this have access to University classrooms are questions to be pondered. Would professor Livingston approve of "restricting the right to be white" of these children?

Strategic anti-white racism

Bruno's picture

The Utility of White-Bashing, by Reihan Salam for The Atlantic


Referring to the racist tweets sent out by soon-to-be editor for the NYT, Sarah Jeong:

[O]ne reason I’ve been disinclined to take this sort of talk seriously in the past is that it has so often smacked of intra-white status jockeying. It is almost as though we’re living through a strange sort of ethnogenesis, in which those who see themselves as (for lack of a better term) upper-whites are doing everything they can to disaffiliate themselves from those they’ve deemed lower-whites. Note that to be “upper” or “lower” isn’t just about class status, though of course that’s always hovering in the background. Rather, it is about the supposed nobility that flows from racial self-flagellation. 


Continued here: 


In other words, "elite" white people hate their "lower" brethren, something we have noticed for quite a while now, and should be considered obvious. Population replacement via immigration is the logical next step for them.


That thought reminds me of the "elite White" (of Jewish descent), and NeoCon extraordinaire, Bill Kristol, quite plainly coming out of the hate closet, and stating that we should want to replace "lower" whites with immigrants:

"Look, to be totally honest, if things are so bad as you say with the white working class, don't you wanna get new Americans in that aren't gonna be - I'm serious, you can make a case - now this is going on too long and this is too crazy probably and I hope this thing isn't being, like, ya know, videotaped, or ever shown anywhere - whatever tiny pathetic future I have is gonna be totally collapsed -


Continued here: 



A racist disgrace

Bruno's picture

It's a racially motivated socialism/communism, which makes it easier to sell to the uneducated population. It's not ethereal "capitalists", but the white devil that is the cause of your problems.

If you look at the latest interview of Julius Malena (EFF black communist party) denying there is a white genocide, you can clearly tell he is lying through his teeth, pushing all the politically correct buttons of the Western psyche, and enjoying himself deeply in the process.

When he said a while back that he is "not calling for the killing of white people ... yet", what he meant was the exact opposite of course, and we see the results in the vicious, vile, and savage farm murders going on. The police do not cooperate with the victims, and make the absurd claim that they are "robberies gone wrong", although we know from various testimonies that this is not the case. One does not boil to death newborn children during a robbery.

Theresa May, prime minister of the UK, has proven herself to be a disgrace not only on Brexit but on South Africa. On her visit to the country, where she indulged in embarrassing displays of "dancing" to black tribal music, among other things, she has given her support to "land reform" (i.e. expropriation without compensation), as long as it is done "legally". Nigel Farage, with an apparently newfound courage (that he tragically did not garner to defend Tommy Robinson), has called out May on his Twitter account, stating the obvious fact that the prime minister does not have the courage to "stand up for white people" no matter what, because of today's anti-white political correctness, even when they are barbarically being persecuted.

I watched Farmlands only last week...

Olivia's picture

it's horrific. Southern does an excellent job on this!
Expertly made doco and shows exactly what communism looks like when left to its devices.

"Kill the Boer!"

Bruno's picture

FARMLANDS, documentary by Lauren Southern

Is a white genocide occuring, or about to occur, in black controlled South Africa? Lauren Southern investigates the epidemic of farm murders occuring in the "Rainbow Nation".

NYT hires a racist Oriental woman

Bruno's picture

Newest Member of NYT Editorial Board Has History of Racist Tweets

Sarah Jeong, who will be joining the New York Times editorial board in September, has expressed open disdain for white people in numerous tweets sent between 2013 and 2015.

Jeong’s Twitter account is replete with racial insults against white people, whom she has described as “groveling goblins,” “bullshit,” “miserable,” and “dogs.”



The New York Times, when confronted about it, doubled down on their hiring decision and said it is "confident she will be an important voice" for their editorial board.

Your DNA is an abomination

Bruno's picture

In order not to forget last year's obscene article published by the Texas State University student newspaper:

Your [White] DNA is an abomination

Link: https://thefederalistpapers.or...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.