The #MeToo’s Attempted Castration of Kavanaugh

Olivia's picture
Submitted by Olivia on Wed, 2018-09-26 00:21

By Olivia Pierson
http://www.oliviapierson.org/b...

Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s hearing to be admitted to the Supreme Court started out as a circus thanks to Democrats trying to shut the whole process down. Now it has become an all out lynching - and why not? Kavanaugh is fair game under the rules of the #MeToo movement, for he’s a straight, male conservative, which means he has a pair of balls and the whole movement of #MeToo exists only to castrate men. ‘Off With Their Balls!’ should be their official tagline.

Let’s be very clear about this. There is only one victim in this low and filthy debacle, initially set into motion by senatorial shrew Diane Feinstein. The victim is Kavanaugh. His accuser, Dr. Christine Basley Ford, who had a suppressed memory resurface in a psychotherapy session, is wielding a powerful weapon that modern men deeply fear: a sexual assault allegation. Dr. Ford “didn’t tell anyone about the incident until a therapy session with her husband in 2012.” The alleged incident happened when she was 15 years old and at high-school, though nobody has been able to corroborate her story.

Deborah Ramirez, the second woman to lay an accusation of sexual assault, claims that while she was incredibly pissed during a drinking game at university, Kavanaugh flashed his penis at her. Ramirez, “who is fifty-three, attended Yale with Kavanaugh, where she studied sociology and psychology. Later, she spent years working for an organization that supports victims of domestic violence.” Nobody has corroborated Ramirez’ story.

So, after Brett Kavanaugh’s judicial confirmation hearing, which was a rowdy process of hours and days of questions over the constant interruptions of belligerent Democratic senators, what are we left with? A delay before voting which hangs on the say-so of two women: one with a repressed memory from high-school involving being pinned to a bed by some male, and another who’s trying to remember a rather naughty incident through the veil of a drunken haze at university. They’re demanding a full FBI investigation into these matters, even though Kavanaugh has already had six FBI background checks done on him over the course of his career.

Neither Ramirez, nor Ford considered that what had happened to them all those years ago was egregious enough to lodge a complaint with either the police, their educational institutions or their parents. Ford failed to ever mention it to anyone, not even her girlfriends, until her regressive memory session in 2012. But somehow now, in the cultural climate of #MeToo, these women’s accusations are enough to potentially end a good man’s career as a judge. Welcome to female tyranny where facts don’t have to be established as character assassinations are enough, and victim status, or being seen to represent victims, is the quickest route to fame.

Take Michael Avanatti for instance, the lawyer who represented porn star Stormy Daniels. He’s now claiming that he has “explosive information” from a woman he is now representing with some story that Kavanaugh, his friend Mark Judge, and others targeted women with drugs and alcohol “in order to allow a train of men to subsequently gang rape them” at house parties in the early 1980s.

If Ford or Ramirez had any credibility at all (and I don't think they have) this nonsense from Avanatti just blew it right out of the swamp. As if anyone who is halfway decent is going to believe that a guy like Kavanaugh, during his time at Yale, was instigating or standing back and watching other men instigate "rape gangs."

Ford’s story was first told in confidence to Senator Feinstein via a letter back in July of this year, but Feinstein, trying to be the clever cat, used the information when it was clear that Kavanaugh would probably be confirmed as the new Supreme Court Justice. Ford’s story was then splashed about the media with a threateningly brazen air of daring anybody to cast doubt on its veracity. To doubt her story is to vice-signal to the world that you’re an evil, callous person for “not believing the pain of a woman’s sexual assault.” #MeTooers have an infantile habit of placing a female “victim’s” feelings miles above the effort of establishing any facts.

As far as the Democrats are concerned, Kavanaugh is guilty of sexual assault with no due process even needed for folks to arrive at that serious conclusion. They’ve already come out and said that they believe the women. Every single spokesperson, from the Whitehouse to the Senate, to all the media commentators on air, gingerly tippy-toed on eggshells around these women with the exception of Mark Levin and President Trump.

Levin put it best:

Why shouldn’t I believe Brett Kavanaugh’s denials? Why should I believe his accusers? It’s Brett Kavanaugh who’s the public man. It’s Brett Kavanaugh who chose to be a public man. It’s Brett Kavanaugh who acceded to six FBI background checks.

That’s right. Six. Now these women come forward, aided by Democrat senators and sleazy lawyers, just as Kavanaugh’s about to be confirmed for SCOTUS? None of this bothered them before when he was a U.S Circuit Judge?

In just two weeks we’ve watched as Democrats organised for Kavanaugh to be outrageously protested and abused during his confirmation hearing to now watching them orchestrate the beginnings of a case that Kavanaugh was involved in drugging, boozing and lining up young women to be gang raped by men. Yeah right. The Kavanaughs are hardly the Clintons.

This has now gone from the ridiculous to the absurdly preposterous. It has the mendacious stench of an #MeToo ritual castration all over it. Remember! Off With Their Balls!

If you enjoyed this article, please buy my book Western Values Defended: A Primer​ ​​


Justice Kavanaugh

Richard G McGrath's picture

Delighted that Brett Kavanaugh has finally been confirmed to the Supreme Court despite the hysterical unsupported accusations from the Democrats and their proxies. Looking at the "liberal" justices on SCOTUS, two of them are aged 80 and 85. If Trump wins a second term, surely these two (Ginsburg and Breyer) will either retire or expire, whereupon President Trump can appoint two more constitutionalists. That would be his greatest legacy (among many) to the nation. More great news: according to a speech the President made in Kansas last night, the U.S. is now the largest producer of both oil and gas internationally. Mind you, he did warn Americans they would get tired of winning...

Call for Death Receives Slap On Wrist

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Look at what an American professor at an elite university can write about Judge Kavanaugh while NOT being firing! Georgetown University's Dr. Carol Christine Fair tweeted four days ago:

"Look at [this] chorus of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist’s arrogated entitlement. All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes."

https://nypost.com/2018/10/05/...

Summary of the Senate Investigator

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Ms. Ford's claim of being sexually assaulted by Judge Kavanaugh seem incredible on many levels.

http://apps.washingtonpost.com...

Kang and Kodos

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Psychotherapy today is stunningly irrational, depraved, and sexually perverted. After having had her brains scrambled by psycho-babble for all these years, from several directions, it wouldn't surprise me to hear Christine Ford eventually say, in a perfectly modulated voice, and with a straight face:

"Then I was forcibly abducted by the space aliens, removed to Mars, and sexually assaulted therein. My hippocampus and mendulla obligata quite assure me of this. It's beyond all doubt that these extraterrestrial violations were undertaken at the behest of their earthbound mentor and commander, Brett Kavanangh."

Greg

Neil Parille's picture

It's not an "arbitrary assertion." Ford has made an allegation that K assaulted her. It's either true or false. Considering that there is no proof that they ever met, much less that he assaulted her, the most reasonable conclusion is that it isn't true.

As far as an "arbitrary assertion" goes, the concept doesn't have much usefulness. According your buddy Jim Valliant, it is an "arbitrary assertion" that Ayn Rand was born in Russia or wrote Atlas Shrugged because it is in a book by Barbara Branden, or something like that.

Neil

gregster's picture

There is nothing to be gained from investigating an arbitrary assertion. From my perspective this illustrates the endemic stupidity of modern life. The president would be best to ignore it all as the peanut gallery sideshow it is.

Ford

Neil Parille's picture

I don't think she said she forgot about the memory from the time it allegedly happened until 2012; however, I'd like to know if the therapist was a "repressed memory" type. It's an important question that needs to be asked.

Body English

Neil Parille's picture

I don't know what to make of body language, but this has a lot of good points:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Looney-Tune

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Psychology makes you nuts! That's my best guess as for why Christine Ford (with her admittedly phony, affected, weepy, crushed, ever-frying, 5-year-old-girl voice) sounded so credible at the U.S. Senate hearing two days ago (Sept. 27, 2018).

Reportedly Dr. Ford has attended personal psychotherapy sessions for years, and is herself a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University, as well as a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine. That's enough to make anyone batshit crazy! Sticking out tongue

Silver lining

Richard Wiig's picture

Apparently many demorat voters are walking away and will now be voting Republican, spurred on by this travesty.

Dr Ford

Chris R's picture

 Dr Ford claims "he (Kavanaugh) ruined my life due to the incident when I was 15 years old." Then she claims that she'd forgotten about the alleged incident until 2012 when her house was being refurbished. So...if there was 30 odd years between the alleged incident and her re-awakening to it then how can that extensive portion of her life have been "ruined?"  I suggest that the incident did not occur at least in the way she now chooses to depict it. Has her life been "ruined?" Isn't it more likely she lived the sort of routine life we all do after graduating with a few scars, regrets and might-haves. Then along came the Democrats with an opportunity for self-aggrandising victimhood.   

Absolutely Joe...

Olivia's picture

To hear that voice coming out of that face...combined with her constant line of "I don't remember", in that voice, it was a strike against her in credibility.

Doesn't match does it. Seriously messed up woman - or serious character actress. Probably both.

Face vs. Voice

Jmaurone's picture

"I've never seen such a silly woman trying so hard to sound like a fragile little victim and talking in a vocal fry, baby-girl way to try to appear innocent and vulnerable. Her performance disgusted me viscerally."

I was following the hearings on tv, and had no clue what these people looked like. But while I was driving, yesterday, I heard some of her Ford's testimony on the radio. It was jarring to me, because they kept referring to events from 35 years ago, yet she sounded, as you said, like a "vocal fry baby-girl". I was at least expecting the "vocal fry", gleaned from Linz's posts that I had previously read, but even then, this did not sound like the voice of a mature woman, let alone a doctor of psychology. She still sounded like a teenager. So when I finally saw her face, later last night online, it was jarring. Not to be superficial, but there is something to be said about presentation in matters like this, and how one presents themselves after a certain age. To hear that voice coming out of that face...combined with her constant line of "I don't remember", in that voice, it was a strike against her in credibility.

I didn't cite anything on it...

Olivia's picture

because it is obvious. That's what counsellors do. Bring out memories that suddenly make someone think they've suffered chronic abuse, which wasn't a problem for them before then. This is a woman who studied psychology in the 80s and has a Doctorate in some sort of Statistics studies also. If this "abuse" she suffered was a real problem for her life, do you not think, living in the world today where personal counsellors and analysts have been a fashion for Americans for 30 years, her own EQ might have led her before 2012 to analyse a traumatic matter in her past for the sake of her own personal growth and wellbeing? Apparently she suppressed it and it surfaced with her therapist.

I've never seen such a silly woman trying so hard to sound like a fragile little victim and talking in a vocal fry, baby-girl way to try to appear innocent and vulnerable. Her performance disgusted me viscerally.

I've got a friend who, in 1984, was raped at knife-point by a neighbour down the road when walking her dog. The guys invited her in for a drink and she just innocently and naively thought they wanted to be her friend, so tied the dog up outside and went in. She was brutally raped with a knife to her throat and a hand covering her mouth. She went and told the police. It was hard for her, and deeply traumatic, but she knew she had been grossly transgressed against. She was 15!!

To this day, she's tough, independent, super good natured, funny and a great mother. She never plays the victim because she has too much self respect and living to do. I knew her for several years before she ever mentioned it because she had put it well behind her. When she did tell me, she didn't cry or get emotional, she just told me the facts as if recalling something that was a long, long time ago that no longer effected her anymore. She's 50.

This Dr. Ford creature is milking this "pain" for all its worth while everyone tip-toes around her "grief and suffering." FFS! She wasn't even raped, she was manhandled, if that is even true.

Heroes Emerge from the Squalor

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Humans are taking on The Filth. Hero #1: Joe DiGenova—

Hero #2: Lindsey Graham—

Kavanaugh's accuser is an obvious flake, an empty-headed soulless fry-quacker. The type who now runs the world, to the applause of Obleftivists.

Suppressed Memory

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Olivia -- You write that Dr. Ford "had a suppressed memory resurface in a psychotherapy session" and that this was presumably where the sexual assault charge originated. But the article you cited doesn't seem to mention that, and I can't find anything about it online. Where did you get this information?

Boys Will Be...

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Getting high, and acting wild and crazy, from time to time is exactly what you're supposed to do in high school and college. And making occasional mistakes while flirting with, and trying to seduce, the girls is also drop-dead normal behavior for males. No-one who is healthy grows up in a PC mausoleum.

So let me get this straight

Neil Parille's picture

Sounds like Brett drank a little too much in college, acted crazy, but still followed catholic morality when it came to pre-marital sex. Sounds like someone I know.

Pure Evil

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Schumer, Pelosi, Feinstein et al—pure evil who are not even trying to disguise it. They are proudly, sneeringly, openly, viciously evil. These are diabolists. Even lower are Obleftivists who say one should vote for them. To call all these deformities "The Filth" is insulting to filth. I regret I can't do better.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.