Mosque Shootings, Christchurch, New Zealand

Lindsay Perigo's picture
Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Fri, 2019-03-15 06:33

As is being reported all over the world right now, there have been mass shootings in two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, a country hitherto seemingly immune to this kind of madness. At the time I write this, the number of fatalities is forty; New Zealand has never experienced, nor could ever imagine, anything like it. Four people are in custody. One of these is Brenton Tarrant, an Australian moronnial who signalled his intentions in advance on those repositories of moronnial Narcissism, Twit-Witter and Faecesbook, where he, naturally, livestreamed his attack:

https://www.news.com.au/world/...

Tarrant revealed he had been planning an attack for up to two years, noting he decided on Christchurch three months ago.

He said New Zealand was not the “original choice for attack”, but described it as “target rich of an environment as anywhere else in the West”.

“An attack in New Zealand would bring to attention the truth of the assault on our civilisation, that no where (sic) in the world was safe, the invaders were in all of our lands, even in the remotest areas of the world and that tehre was no where (sic) left to go that was safe and free from mass immigration."

Elsewhere in his Manifesto Tarrant said he wanted “to take revenge for Ebba Akerlund,” a 12-year-old Swedish girl who was murdered in the Stockholm lorry attack in April, 2017 by Rakhmat Akilov, an asylum-seeker from Uzbekistan.

As a libertarian who unapologetically despises Islam for its murderous totalitarianism and shameless advocacy of the initiation of force—its Sharia Law and its Jihad in pursuit of a world-wide caliphate—I want to say for the record that I also despise Tarrant and his accomplices for their murderous totalitarianism. Apart from the senseless evil of their initiation of force today, they have betrayed the very values of Western Civilisation in whose name they purport to have acted, which include the right (denied by Islam) to peacefully adhere to any religion of one's choice, or no religion at all. They have played right into the hands of the usual suspects who will now redouble their efforts to clamp down on another of Western Civilisation's bedrock principles, freedom of speech; efforts to criminalise criticism of Islam were already well underway, and will now probably, tragically, become irresistible. Those who routinely stay silent in the face of Islamoterrorism will not hesitate to condemn "white supremacist, extremist, far-right terrorism" by name in this instance and demand the shutting down of peaceful, polemical criticism that doesn't remotely fall under any of those categories.

This is an inexpressibly sad day for those close to the victims of today's atrocity, who were not remotely directly accountable for the killing of Ebba Akerlund. Does the magnificent, history-changing principle of "I disagree with what you say but defend to the death your right to say it" have to be a fatality also?


Don't download it, don't share it

Bruno's picture

Please note the New Zealand government has banned the downloading and sharing of the so-called manifesto and will enforce severe punishments.

If you fall under said jurisdiction please act accordingly and keep yourself and your family and loved ones safe.

Thank you.

Almost Unprecedented

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Moslems massacre Westerners on a routine basis. But the reverse seems very rare. Other than this one, the last time I can remember was 25 years ago: In 1994 Benjamin Goldstein murdered 29 Palestinians in Hebron, Israel. But that was a rather special situation. Can anyone remember any other instances like the New Zealand one?

Video

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Unsurprisingly, I can't locate a copy of the video. Sad

remove all the videos or face complete annihilation

Jon Letendre's picture

"We are being threatened to remove all the videos or face complete annihilation online, starting with being de-platformed from infrastructure providers, followed by legal action from none other than the nation of Australia (not even New Zealand itself, but Australia and it’s “Office of the eSafety Commissioner.”)

[...]

"I will record a strong video follow-up message in the coming days and post it on Brighteon, unless the internet tyrants annihilate it first. We are working hard to protect free speech, but the globalists are now holding loaded guns at our head and saying they will pull the trigger if we do not comply. For the moment, we are forced to comply in order to save all the other videos on the platform. However, in the long run, we have no intention whatsoever to comply with tyranny and authoritarianism."

– Mike Adams

https://www.naturalnews.com/20...

Hi Linz

Jon Letendre's picture

Hi Linz.
What should I clarify?

So again, please ...

Lindsay Perigo's picture

... what is the effing point?!

Whereabouts is this video?

Richard Wiig's picture

Whereabouts is this video?

Try to view the whole video, and sections I wrote about.

Jon Letendre's picture

Greg, try to view the sections I wrote about. The level of discernment required to see what I describe is about equal to that of this disappearing, apparently cgi'd, brass.
The video is 16:55 or 16:58, almost 17 minutes.

To clarify what I wrote about his gun failing to defeat his windshield: you are right that most of the video is him driving his car. After the "shooting" I wrote about, he drives a while. He comes to a stop. People are getting in or out of a car about three or four car lengths ahead. He points a long gun at them and attempts to shoot them through his own windshield. A cloud of grey gasses erupts from the gun, but there is no damage to the glass. Then we see him load more shells, and they are plastic shells for a shotgun. He fires again. This is point-blank, he is in the driver's seat. Yet, again the glass is unaffected. Then a third time. No broken glass. Even bulletproof would be traumatized by three point-blank shotgun impacts, even if not penetrated, whatever the projectile load (bird shot, buck shot, single slug.) But it wasn't penetrated, it wasn't cracked, it wasn't affected at all, which is impossible if the shells had projectiles in them. Also, the dashboard would be cut to pieces by now if projectiles were ricochetting downward, yet there is no damage to it. He doesn't shoot at his windshield again that I saw, in the 17 minute video I saw. He finally gets that gun to shatter the glass of the passenger's door — something the expanding blast of gasses of a strong blank load can certainly accomplish, point-blank, (and direct shot, no angle of attack like at the windshield.)

When I saw this segment especially, I understood immediately the news I had heard about how hard authorities are trying to squelch the video.

Yes, exactly, Greg

Jon Letendre's picture

Yes, exactly, Greg, it is not due to any limitation of the camera. These are shiny, and not small objects, and much smaller things are clearly resolved.

Jon

gregster's picture

I have to say, when the shells are ejecting outside up the street to the right they do seem to disappear. And it doesn’t seem to be due to any limitation on the go pro camera. I would have expected a dozen to be on the driveway.

Suppressed Video

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Jon Letendre -- Thanks for all that. But bear in mind that video evidence isn't everything. There also needs to be an explanation as to who made the video and why. But first let see if I can track down the video.

Yes, dozens of them can be

Jon Letendre's picture

Yes, dozens of them can be seen flying out of the gun to the right and forward, which is normal. But they disappear while still in the air.

Small leaves and other objects much smaller than a brass casing can be seen clearly on the pavement.
No brass is heard landing and bouncing and none is visible on the pavement.
The dozens of ejected brass casings should be bouncing off the pavement, spinning on the pavement, rolling around on the pavement. But there is none at all on the pavement.

The brass can be seen disappearing in the video, while still in the air.

In that segment of the video, when he is shooting outside, the ejected brass is quite plainly an artifact of cgi, meaning the gun isn't firing at all.

Would someone mind ...

Lindsay Perigo's picture

... explaining what's going on here?

Jon

gregster's picture

A 3 min version was circulated. The shells can clearly be seen ejecting right forwards from the weapon.

So you have not seen the video.

Jon Letendre's picture

So you have not seen the video.
You should see it, I will be interested in your opinion after you do.

Jon

gregster's picture

Your belief that the video is fake is ridiculous. The camera wasn't up close. He didn't shoot windows. It's a carpeted area. He goes out to his grey car in the driveway afterwards with its rear door open showing what may be petrol canisters after shooting up the street path in both directions. It was sent about through Whatsapp--apparently that's encrypted? I'm told much of the rest is in his car. And the real moon landing vid wasn't faked.

Seen it?

Jon Letendre's picture

Hi Gregster. So you've seen it? I can't find it anywhere now.

Jon

gregster's picture

You're damn right. Just like the first moon landing vid.

G

Ban on the video is not surprising once you view it.

Jon Letendre's picture

Hi Kyrel, Have you seen any of the video? You really have to see for yourself. It's no wonder they're so desperate to erase it forever, it is really quite obviously fake. The authorities can't tolerate the masses seeing it because they would immediately demand answers to your question.

Fake Video?

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Jon Letendre -- Thanks for posting that! This is the first I've heard of it. But why would the shooter, or someone else, fake such a video?

AU/NZ censorship

Jon Letendre's picture

"ISPs in AU and NZ start censoring the internet without legal precedent: A full list of blocked websites can be found below: voat, 4chan, 8ch, liveleak, archive, Bitchute, zerohedge, kiwifarms ,,, "

https://www.investmentwatchblo...

Rand said not while there is still free speech ...

Jon Letendre's picture

The video of the event, which your government is threatening imprisonment for the possession of and is trying to prevent you from seeing, was faked. https://d.tube/#!/v/highimpactflix/l3p2l643

At 7:00 and at 7:40 he fires dozens of rounds in the large room at end of hall, toward the people piled up to the left and toward the people piled up to the right. At 10:59, on the right side of the room, a "shot" blows the cap off a head, but does not traumatize the head, thus no head destruction or blood splatter on wall, just cap blown off, by gunpowder—only round from his "weapon." No holes in the walls, no holes in people's backs. He has now fired several dozen rounds in this direction from the middle of the room. Window is intact, no broken glass is evident. No blood on these people's hands, arms, faces, clothes, floor around them.

From 8:57 to 9:10 in the video several dozen rounds fired. No brass heard bouncing on the pavement, none seen on the pavement, the ejected brass disappears in midair, none is seen bouncing on the ground or rolling around on the ground. He stands still firing dozens of rounds, the brass is flying to a spot on the ground to his right, but then it's gone. The ejected brass is CGI, very sloppy, incomplete computer-generated imagery.

From 11:24 to 11:30 he is on the left side of the room. Again, he has fired dozens of rounds in this direction from the middle of the room, yet there are no holes in the wall. His "shots" on these people are not resulting in any blood splatter to the wall, just puffing their clothes and hair. Blue sweater gets puffed by the hot expanding gas of a blank, but no holes in the sweater or blood. No blood on their hands, feet, clothes.

At 12:50 his shotgun fails to defeat his own windshield!

Then again at 12:53!

Again at 13:12!

Finally, at 13:21, the pressure is sufficient given blunter angle to the glass, and the pressure of the projected gasses is sufficient to defeat the glass.

Philosophy

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Greg -- I kinda thought that too! Sticking out tongue

That mass-killer was a gross philosophical incompetent. Based on his published manifesto, he hated and blamed individualism and capitalism for the decline of the West. But he did notice something -- in frustration, despair, and murderous fury -- that most people today miss: Moslems today are at war with the Western nations, and their mass immigration into the West, along with other Third World savage enemies, is killing us.

Is the shooter Bandler? Sounds like it..

gregster's picture

“It’s the birthrates.

It’s the birthrates.

If there is one thing I want you to remember from these writings, its that the birthrates must change. Even if we were to deport all Non-Europeans from our lands tomorrow, the European people would still be spiraling into decay and eventual death.

Every day we become fewer in number, we grow older, we grow weaker.

In the end we must return to replacement fertility levels, or it will kill us.

To maintain a population the people must achieve a birthrate that reaches replacement fertility levels. In the Western world this is roughly 2.06 births per woman.”

Manifesto

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Here's the killer's manifesto:

[Edit by Linz: Sorry folks, but I've just learned via the Free Speech Coalition that the manifesto has been banned in NZ. The Thought Police have struck. See FSC press release at the top of the page.]

Senator Fraser Anning...

Grant Jones's picture

... is completely, absolutely right. The guilt lay with the traitor elite who allowed the invading orcs in.

Sickening Media Coverage

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Since I posted the primary post more than 24 hours ago I watched NZ TV (Channel 1) for the first time in years, finding the fry-quacking and brain-death as unendurable as ever. To this must now be added wanton vicious evil. This guy has played perfectly into its hands. I gather he spent time in North Korea and Pakistan, loved the regime of Communist China and hated capitalism. Just like our "journalists." If not an Islamo-Marxist by conviction, he has certainly advanced that cause.

Now I see they now are blaming Trump and Pamela Geller. Can they get any more pathetic?!

The Natural and Inevitable Reaction to the Nightmare of Moslems

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Richard -- Exactly. The remarkable evil of Moslems and their philosophy of Islam needs to be publicly identified for what they are. So too the pretty terrible evil of the SJWs and the philosophy of political correctness, multiculturalism, diversity, inclusion, cultural relativism, etc. which excuse and even promote Islamics and their ideology. These two groups are monstrous allies. They cause otherwise decent and good Westerners to become frustrated, infuriated, utterly despairing -- and then violent. At the least, it makes previously respectable Westerners turn nationalist, racist, alt-right, white supremacist -- and even demagogic, fascist, and Hitlerian.

What makes it inevitable,

Richard Wiig's picture

What makes it inevitable, Kyrel, is the evasion of the root problem. If we were dealing with Islam honestly then this wouldn't have happened. Already the response has been to pour on more poisonous bromides, about diversity and touchy-feely togetherness, which will only ensure that much worse is yet to come.

There seems to be a link to

Richard Wiig's picture

There seems to be a link to Serbia.

https://vladtepesblog.com/2019...

Payback

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Savage Moslems perpetrate so many unprovoked massacres against civilized Westerners. It's almost inevitable that one time out of a thousand Westerners return the favor.

Eco-fascist fan of Chinese Communism

Jmaurone's picture

“He calls himself an ‘Eco-fascist,’ one who combines environmentalism, racism and authoritarianism into one repulsive package. In his mind the world is dying from over-population, but over-population of the ‘wrong’ kind. He hates capitalism, free markets, and free trade but he loves the Communist Chinese government and fascism.”

https://medium.com/the-radical...

? surprising this atrocity wasn't by slime carriers!

gregster's picture

Why on earth would someone do that? Ummm. No doubt the perpetrators will be branded as nutters and the many moslem extremist killers will continue on their free ride against civilisation, and be welcomed in returning to their homelands after aiding and abetting ISIS.. This murderous action will prove to be counter-productive, being against civilian targets, but let's not forget we are in a war declared by the carriers of the Islam virus.

And look out for every variety of state sponsored supremacist succour.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.