The Inalienable Right to Blaspheme

Lindsay Perigo's picture
Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Sat, 2020-09-05 05:09

Charlie Hebdo has courageously published those cartoons again, to mark the beginning of the trial in Paris this week of suspected accomplices and enablers of the main perpetrators of the atrocities who, mercifully, no longer pollute the planet. Astonishingly, the normally Wet Woke Macron has defended Charlie's right to do so. Would that New Zealand Woke-Fascists, hell-bent on criminalising criticism of Islam, emulated Macron instead:

"It's never the place of a president of the Republic to pass judgment on the editorial choice of a journalist or newsroom, never. Because we have freedom of the press. There is in France a freedom to blaspheme which is attached to the freedom of conscience. I am here to protect all these freedoms. In France, one can criticize a president, governors, blaspheme. We will all have a thought for the women and men who were cowardly shot because they drew, wrote, corrected, were there to help, to deliver."

https://www.dw.com/en/frances-...

Exemplary piece on this subject by Brendan O'Neill in Spiked:

Once again the famously fuck-you French magazine has published caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad. And not any old caricatures. It has published the ones that made it a target for radical Islamist fury and mass murder in January 2015, when two al-Qaeda-inspired gunmen stormed into its offices and massacred 10 of its cartoonists and writers for the ‘crime’ of blasphemy, for the ‘sin’ of mocking the Prophet. Have Charlie Hebdo’s new editors gone mad? What are they thinking republishing the Muhammad-mocking cartoons that led to that act of deranged slaughter just five years ago? ...

This is unquestionably a free-speech issue. The right to doubt, question and even mock all gods, prophets, ideologies and fads is essential to a free society. The exercise of this right will sometimes cause offence, sure, but people feeling offended is an infinitesimally small price to pay for living in a society in which you have the right to express your views, whether you’re an irreligious piss-taking satirist, a hardcore Islamist, or just a regular person. Hurt feelings pale into insignificance in contrast with the essential and empowering nature of freedom of expression. ...

https://www.spiked-online.com/...


Islamo-Savage Mohammed ....

Lindsay Perigo's picture

... one of the most disgusting sub-humans who ever lived. Loved by Biden, Harris, Obama, Clinton, Soros, "journalists," Academia, Big Tech, Leftie Ghoulish Bolshevik Totalitarian Quislings, Woke-Fascist pronoun fascists and the rest of The Filth:

Only

Mr_Lineberry's picture

in America?

Disclaimer: I express no opinion on the accuracy of the information in the email.

Today I received this extraordinary email and find it astonishing; would this be legal in NZ? not sure; (probably not?) It comes from an anonymous email address. They sure play dirty in America! haha! I have already voted, of course, and skipped the Manhattan Beach council elections (oh please: who cares?) and am hardly going to either fall for an obvious smear, nor would I make up my mind based on an obvious smear.

"...All public employment jobs require a background investigation to assure that the applicant is worthy of the public trust. Candidates for City Council should be no exception.

As a Manhattan Beach resident who may be voting in this election, you should know about the following public records pertaining to Richard Montgomery:
Felony Grand Theft, Penal Code Section 487 (A) conviction (Criminal Case No. KA02981).

Note: This occurred during the time Richard Montgomery was a Reserve Police Officer I with the City of South Pasadena.

---> Click here to see this public record document. <---

Stipulated Surrender of License and Order re: “Misleading and Inaccurate Appraisal Reports” (Certified General Appraiser’s License No. AG02371; Case Nos. C090605-03m and C20130115-010).

Note: This occurred during Richard Montgomery’s term on City Council, 2005-2009.

---> Click here to see this public record document. <---

California Fair Political Practices Commission - FPPC Form 700, Amendment, Schedule D, Travel Payments reports travel from July 29, 2018 though August 6, 2018 to Beijing, China in the amount of $6,599.00 paid for by Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries, during his current term on Council.

Note: This occurred during Richard Montgomery’s term on City Council (2017-2020).

---> Click here to see this public record document. <---

Apparently, the political leadership of Manhattan Beach is choosing to ignore these records or remain silent, apparently hoping that our residents won’t ever know, or maybe they think you don’t care.

Let me tell you about the political leadership in Manhattan Beach, all former Mayors and pubic figures in our community.

The felony conviction and stipulated surrender of license and order are both known to former Mayors Russ Lesser and Bob Holmes, Mayors from the 1980s. Yet, both have endorsed candidate Richard Montgomery, with Holmes managing his current campaign for his fourth term.

Former Mayors Howorth, Tell, Fahey, Aldinger and Napolitano, who all have previously served with candidate Richard Montgomery, apparently knew of the felony conviction and stipulated surrender of license and order as well, yet they have joined in endorsing this candidate.

Let’s be clear that candidate Richard Montgomery would be “disqualified” from being a police officer, firefighter or any other position of public employment.

I find the City’s political leadership’s endorsement and support of Richard Montgomery disturbing and deeply troubling. I think you might too.

Something is terribly wrong in Manhattan Beach when its political leadership appears to desperately want a convicted felon on Council. Simply put, this is not right! It’s time for our community to stand up to the political leadership and the time for change is now.

You, our residents, can make it right by voting for candidates who have proven to be worthy of the public trust. You should reject this “political insider” cronyism that’s gone on for almost thirty years. We are better than that.

As if that’s not enough, there is this...

His latest shenanigans...
The Fair Political Practices Commission has opened an investigation against Felon (previous conviction for Felony Grand Theft) Richard Montgomery. Seems Felon Montgomery didn’t disclose a fundraiser he held at the 900 Club in 2017 where he raised $7,200! How did the FPPC find out about the 900 Club fundraiser? Felon Montgomery actually admitted it at a City Council meeting last year.

Felon Montgomery supports both Short Term Rentals (think AIRBNB) in all residential neighborhoods and the environmental disaster known as the West Basin Desalination Plant. Special interests own Felon Montgomery.
End corruption in Manhattan Beach. DO NOT RE-ELECT RICHARD MONTGOMERY!

About Richard Montgomery 1400 Highland Ave Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 USA

Click here to unsubscribe...."

Paul Joseph Watson

Mr_Lineberry's picture

on the subject of Islam and the beheadings in Frogland

"Draw

Mr_Lineberry's picture

A cartoon - get hit by a goon" haha!

Don't you just despise the "oh not all of us support this hateful person" crowd?!? - (the default position of libertarians everywhere, BTW Eye haha!) - as if such virtue signaling impresses anybody.

Great video Lindsay!!

How the Religion of Peace ...

Lindsay Perigo's picture

... deals with dissent:

KASS Response to Islamo-Fascist

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Happy New Year

Mr_Lineberry's picture

It should be noted that - (in order to appease the left wing mob) - a certain National MP refused, point blank, to attend certain celebrations.

Assuming anyone considered him important enough (they don't Eye haha!) to bother reading his Fecesbook.com page to see what he was doing today, it is sickening cowardice on his part; cave to an ignorant mob of left wing anti semite academics and loons. Pathetic.

Thought for Today...

Mr_Lineberry's picture

1. You meet a chap in a bar.

2. He punches you in the face, pulls a knife, and rapes you.

3. You call the police, he is arrested.

4. He comes to your house, with a weapon, to persuade you to drop the charges. Terrorizes you for a second time.

5. You call the police. They turn up at your house, he points the weapon at them; they open fire.

6. Nobody seems remotely concerned about a rape victim terrorized by a clearly dangerous man.

7. ["You know who"] gives a typically condescending lecture about ....ummmmm.....errm...'moral compass' (!)

8. You turn on the TV one day and see an entire sports team with your rapist's name emblazoned on their uniforms

Does this all sound a bit odd to you? Shocked

(Is this some sort of joke that I don't "get"?!?)

Thought for Today...

Mr_Lineberry's picture

1. You meet a chap in a bar.

2. He punches you in the face, pulls a knife, and rapes you.

3. You call the police, he is arrested.

4. He comes to your house, with a weapon, to persuade you to drop the charges. Terrorizes you for a second time.

5. You call the police. They turn up at your house, he points the weapon at them; they open fire.

6. Nobody seems remotely concerned about a rape victim terrorized by a clearly dangerous man.

7. ["You know who"] gives a typically condescending lecture about ....ummmmm.....errm...'moral compass' (!)

8. You turn on the TV one day and see an entire sports team with your rapist's name emblazoned on their uniforms

Does this all sound a bit odd to you? Shocked

(Is this some sort of joke that I don't "get"?!?)

Labour's

Mr_Lineberry's picture

Tax plan is typically dumb; they want a 39% tax bracket on income above $180,000 per year.

Ironically, the only people who will pay it will be themselves and their civil servant commissars!

Every businessman will not - (you've probably heard the hoots of derisive laughter from one end of the country to the other by businessman responding to the claim $550 million will be raised?) - and let me explain why...

1. The company tax rate is 28%

2. The income tax (when you average it out) on $180,000 is approximately 28%

3. Therefore businessmen will simply not pay themselves anymore than that.

4. Simply retaining the rest of their profits within their company - (whilst waiting for the following election)

5. No one is going to pay 39% when they can pay 28% - and anyone who does ain't going to last very long in business.

Winnie the pooh?!?

Mr_Lineberry's picture

Typical wog....

Mr_Lineberry's picture

Reporter: "Excuse me, may I interview you?"
Man: "Yes!"
Reporter: "Name?"
Man: "Abdul Al-Rhazim."
Reporter: "Sex?"
Man: "Three to five times a week."
Reporter: "No no! I mean male or female?"
Man: "Yes, male, female... sometimes camel."
Reporter: "Holy cow!"
Man: "Yes, cow, sheep... animals in general."
Reporter: "But isn't that hostile?"
Man: "Yes, horse style, dog style, any style."
Reporter: "Oh dear!"
Man: "No, no deer. Deer run too fast. Hard to catch."

Sticking out tongue

World's shortest books

Mr_Lineberry's picture

1. "Essays in Sobriety" by Nancy Pelosi

2. "Rush Hour Collusion: the evidence" by Robert Mueller

3. "My Life of Crime" by Roger Stone

4. "Heterosexual Adventures" by Clark Gayboy ...opps, I mean 'Gayford'.

5. "40 Years of Achievement" by Winston Peters

6. "The Housebuilding Years" by Phil Twyford

7. "Prosperity Through Welfare" by Willie Jackson

8. "Career Options For Gender Studies Graduates"

9. "Racists In New Zealand" by Ming Foon

10. "Treaty of Waitangi: the legal basis" by Geoffrey Palmer

11. "Pacific Travel Guide" by Amelia Earhart

12. "Great Maori Lovers"

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.