who is chatting on SOLO ChatThe Free RadicalPopular contentWho's newWho's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 17 guests online.
PollElection 2008: Who Will Win? Obama by a landslide 12% McCain by a landslide 22% Obama comfortably 14% McCain comfortably 22% Either narrowly 30% Total votes: 50
|
Progressive MetalSubmitted by Omniverse on Fri, 2006-11-24 06:08.
Is Progressive Metal a popular genre among Objectivists? I know that I personally can't find music that moves me more than the best this genre has to offer.
( categories: )
|
User loginFeatured BookNavigation |
No, probably not popular, though...
Amongst the "top artists" in the genre listed here and here, besides the obvious (Porcupine Tree at #16 at last.fm, which is on the fringes of the genre as it is), I haven't been all too moved or impressed by much of the others. I look for songwriting centrally, and the heavy guitar crunches/riffs only if they effectively complement it or properly ornament it. I did like one album from Opeth, which wasn't a typical Opeth album, however: Damnation, a soft, non-metal acoustic album (one of the three Opeth albums produced by PT's Steven Wilson). Track #2 ("In my Time of Need"), especially.
Amongst more "grown-up" Objectivists, I doubt you'll find many fans of harsh or grating sounding music, but more interest in softer, song-driven work. (I can't figure out whether it's "melody" or "harmony" people are referring to when I have in mind the way the notes are put together in wondrous, memorable ways.) Metal may have plenty of impressive arrangements of riffs, chords, drums, and so on, but too little in the way of melody/harmony. I think that the more a genre strays from the standards and norms of the classical-music style, the fewer fans amongst Objectivists you're going to find. (This goes for much of "modern" classical, too, BTW; that is, modernist composition has strayed too far from what makes classical an important listened-to genre.)