But on the plus side, look at all the attention your thread-hijack is getting, uncle-fucker.

Scott DeSalvo

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur!

give Ann Coulter some credit where it is due...

She makes a very valid point that the use of the term "Neoconservative", pejoratively by Socialists, is a codeword for "Jewish".

An anti semitic wink which can be easily denied

You can manacle to me. I'll show you what life's all about! Leave that trollop Claudia to her tartery.

Sorry G. I'll invite you for dinner to have some social intercourse with him too - before any manacling takes place.

Our bed's still warm!!!

I couldn't disagree more.

I'd sell my own grandmother to be manacled against Christopher Hitchens for 12 months!! Oh to hear christians and islamofacists abused in that deep, big balled, beautifully timbred voice so closely, intimately in my ear... phaaaw! If he didn't have yet another wife, I'd go throw myself at him shamelessly. (In fact, If he ever comes to NZ, I think I will - with any luck, he might've left her at home anyway).

You really think Hitchens can be summated so thinly?

think this is a perfect example of two people who deserve each other.

One is an alcoholic windbag and the other a mad woman obsessed with liberals and gays.

I think they should be manacled together for 12 months as a punishment.

It's a rare person who can display four examples of blatant irrationality in only a few sentences over a day or two of posting:

i) Not being willing, even when requested to take 30 seconds to explain the actual content of a link.

ii) Actually and unbelievably replying to the request with a barrage of furious insults and ad hominems unrelated to the request.

iii) Adamantly refusing to grasp the principles that (a) knowing the nature of someone in very general terms (Ann Coulter) does not provide psychic powers enabling one to know what she is saying in any particular video or whether it’s reasonable -and- (b) that asking for a sentence of explanation is not an unreasonable request.

I could understand that I might have angered him with my provocative phrase ‘lazy posting’. Yet, after having had time to let his seething resentment and sense of insult cool, a fair-minded person could still acknowledge the above points.

But the –following- is the most blatant . . . and unprovoked . . . example of someone who seems to be slamming his awareness shut and *escalating his irrationality* to up the ante with an *even stronger* attack on motives or integrity:

iv) "I think it's a safe bet that you and Phil had a good idea what it was about."

This statement questions the honesty of not one, but *two*!!! people without cause or explanation or attempt at justification.

Mr. Simmons, please tell us that you *not* an example of an OAC grad student in philosophy.

I completely agree. Hitchens even autographed my copy of "God Is Not Great". I thanked him. He replied saying that there was no need to thank him, it was an honor and a privilege.

What it's about? You mean to tell me that you don't know anything about Ann Coulter or Christopher Hitchens? I think it's a safe bet that you and Phil had a good idea what it was about.

Christopher Hitchens says: "Religion poisons everything."

Exactly! People who say things like this pretty much deserve a mega-ton of loyalty and friendship. I think Hitchens is an immense fighter for truth, reason, virtue, and human happiness.

I'm much more likely to check out the link if you write something telling me what it's about.

And Wayne, I think the nature of your post prevents you from calling others lazy.

Boy, how quickly some of these threads degenerate into name-calling.

I don't post solely for your pleasure, Phil. So, fuck off, if your lazy ass, non judgemental, kelleyite, sensitivity was offended by the content. Coulter is pathetic, that's the point of the thread you fucking moron!

> Wassamatta? You didn't find anything to whine about recently?

Real mature, shithead.

COULTER: "I'm not plotting his destruction, but the creator is."

The woman is pathetic. And vindictive.

What about "Ann Coulter's reply to Christopher Hitchens" doesnt describe what the link it?

Wassamatta? You didn't find anything to whine about recently?

Are you REALLY suggesting that it is too much trouble for you to spend 10 seconds clicking a link?

Scott DeSalvo

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur!

We live in an age in which the written word is the most effective means of communication.

And some of us would actually like to save time by reading something. (Or don't have broadband or a computer with a lot of memory...)

As a courtesy, if you are going to simply post a video, could you at least take fifteen seconds to offer a ***single sentence*** summarizing what was said or what the point is?

... would be a waste of space if she actually occupied any.

Maybe if she'd eaten before the show she'd have had the energy to come up with a funny riposte.

On the bright side, if she is the best the religious right in America have to offer as a spokesperson, they ain't much of a threat.