Lindsay's Radio Editorial, 5 September—Nanny and my Inbox

Julian Darby's picture
Submitted by Julian Darby on Tue, 2007-09-04 22:07.

Audio and text from Lindsay's Radio Pacific Editorial, Wednesday Sept 5:

Yesterday I got home from the studio to find a flurry of panic-stricken e-mails awaiting me from organisations I regularly receive e-mail from: newsletters, opinion pieces, press releases and the like. Here’s a typical one:
 
“As you may be aware, from 5th of September 2007 anyone sending electronic messages, advertising, and promotions  will require their permission.  This is due to the new Unsolicited Electronic Messages Act.  If you are  not amenable to receiving our e-mails promoting productions, newsletter and the occasional email about other matters relating to the Industry please reply with "unsubscribe" in the subject or message area.” 
 
All were from groups I did NOT wish to unsubscribe from. They could be fined hundreds of thousands of dollars under this new legislation if I or any recipient of their e-mails withheld our permission and continued to receive their material.

At the same time there were the usual unsolicited exhortations to enlarge my penis by several feet and keep it erect all week, claim several billion dollars being held for me in a Nigerian bank account, lose 50 kg in a week, and so forth. The only spam I don’t get that apparently everyone else does is from Russian women looking for husbands. Presumably they’ve heard that would be a waste of time. In any event, none of this spam will be prevented by the legislation. Nor do I expect or ask it to be. I could avail myself of any one of countless anti-spam filters available via the free market, but I don’t bother, since they all block legitimate mail and it’s really no bother to hit the “delete” button a few times a day.

It’s just another example of Nanny State barging in where she isn’t needed, isn’t wanted and can’t do any good anyway. What she will probably do with this legislation is hammer some innocent party promoting via e-mail a position she disapproves of for breaching the law, however inadvertently. Certainly, the current Nanny is capable of that, defining as she does “electioneering” as advocacy of any position associated with a political party.

Remember what we learned yesterday—that Labour and Green members of the Health Select Committee wanted to ban any beverage except water from the workplace. This is not some Orwellian fantasy, it’s what these evil anuses actually tried to have included in the committee’s recommendations. Remember that, and remind yourself that in the light of it, Nanny is not entitled to the benefit of a single second’s doubt. She is Helengrad, she is Clarkistan, she is Comrade Cullen, she is the Muslim MP who wants to stone homosexuals to death ... she is the creeping tyranny whose Fabian trot is accelerating into a Stalinist gallop. Time she was stopped dead in her totalitarian tracks.
 


( categories: )

Yeah ...

Lindsay Perigo's picture

I figured you were boasting again.


Please pass them on.

Mark Hubbard's picture

I regularly get spam offering something like that.

No, it's one that could fit a 'whole salmon' Lindsay.


Warming fish

Lindsay Perigo's picture

you don't sell a long, rectangular but deep fish steamer do you, one that could fit, say, a very big whole salmon?

I regularly get spam offering something like that. Smiling


Psst...

Prima Donna's picture

(Thanks Mark! We sent you a reply so you can find something close to that.) Smiling

Jennifer

-- Food Philosophy. Sensuality. Sass.


Great food site

Mark Hubbard's picture

Jennifer, just had a look at your food site, Gilded Fork (I should be working). What a great site: I'm a not quite alcoholic foodie, who is also chief cook at the moment (my wife has a broken leg), so I've bookmarked your site to have a good look at over the weekend, especially those recipes). But, I've had a quick look in the shop section and can't see a product I've been searching out, unsuccessfully, for a year (can't find in shops or online, not even at Millie's Kitchen): that is, you don't sell a long, rectangular but deep fish steamer do you, one that could fit, say, a very big whole salmon? I've seen one I would like twice on Aussie cook programs on the Food Channel, but, as said, cannot source one.

 

[Um, actually, this was a dumb post to put here, as it's thread hi-jacking. Can't seem to delete it now. Sorry. Jennifer, I've sent same as an email through the contact address on Gilded fork).


Evil anuses

Prima Donna's picture

That turn of phrase is, in a word, poetic. Thank you for the laugh -- I needed it.

Jennifer

-- Food Philosophy. Sensuality. Sass.


Government will have to sue itself

Mark Hubbard's picture

Here's a funny thing. I've been sent  confirmation query emails from just about all the e-letters I'm subscribed to now, however, two subscriptions stand out as not having sent me advices questioning whether I want to carry on receiving emails from them:

1) Parliamentary press releases (of which I would get between five and fifteen per day.

2) The IRD Policy Unit from whom I get press releases also.

Dear oh dear oh dear.


Good editorial. I was

Mark Hubbard's picture

Good editorial. I was actually going to put my first blog entry up on this yesterday, but was too busy returning emails to the numerous, bank, financial planning, business, and real estate e-letters I am subscribed to. Unlike Lindsay, I use a program called MailWasher which solves the problem of Spam for me quite adequately, and thus the emails I've been answering all this week, to keep receiving the information I want to carry on receiving, has been the worst case of spamming I've had to contend with. And basically, this is spamming by the Government.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.