who is chatting on SOLO ChatThe Free RadicalPopular contentWho's onlineThere are currently 6 users and 32 guests online.
PollWhat should the government do about ailing financial institutions? Nothing, except to back off and get out—as any Objectivist knows, intervention is treating the disease with the disease 84% Intervene judiciously—enough to avert a catastrophe that is otherwise imminent 3% Intervene massively—as it's doing 3% Nationalize the whole economy and be done with it. Bring on the USSA! 1% Something else (specify) 9% Total votes: 76
|
Lindsay's Radio Editorial, 5 September—Nanny and my InboxSubmitted by Julian Darby on Tue, 2007-09-04 22:07.
Audio and text from Lindsay's Radio Pacific Editorial, Wednesday Sept 5: Yesterday I got home from the studio to find a flurry of panic-stricken e-mails awaiting me from organisations I regularly receive e-mail from: newsletters, opinion pieces, press releases and the like. Here’s a typical one: At the same time there were the usual unsolicited exhortations to enlarge my penis by several feet and keep it erect all week, claim several billion dollars being held for me in a Nigerian bank account, lose 50 kg in a week, and so forth. The only spam I don’t get that apparently everyone else does is from Russian women looking for husbands. Presumably they’ve heard that would be a waste of time. In any event, none of this spam will be prevented by the legislation. Nor do I expect or ask it to be. I could avail myself of any one of countless anti-spam filters available via the free market, but I don’t bother, since they all block legitimate mail and it’s really no bother to hit the “delete” button a few times a day. It’s just another example of Nanny State barging in where she isn’t needed, isn’t wanted and can’t do any good anyway. What she will probably do with this legislation is hammer some innocent party promoting via e-mail a position she disapproves of for breaching the law, however inadvertently. Certainly, the current Nanny is capable of that, defining as she does “electioneering” as advocacy of any position associated with a political party. Remember what we learned yesterday—that Labour and Green members of the Health Select Committee wanted to ban any beverage except water from the workplace. This is not some Orwellian fantasy, it’s what these evil anuses actually tried to have included in the committee’s recommendations. Remember that, and remind yourself that in the light of it, Nanny is not entitled to the benefit of a single second’s doubt. She is Helengrad, she is Clarkistan, she is Comrade Cullen, she is the Muslim MP who wants to stone homosexuals to death ... she is the creeping tyranny whose Fabian trot is accelerating into a Stalinist gallop. Time she was stopped dead in her totalitarian tracks.
( categories: )
|
User loginFeatured BookNavigation |
Yeah ...
I figured you were boasting again.
Please pass them on.
I regularly get spam offering something like that.
No, it's one that could fit a 'whole salmon' Lindsay.
Warming fish
you don't sell a long, rectangular but deep fish steamer do you, one that could fit, say, a very big whole salmon?
I regularly get spam offering something like that.
Psst...
(Thanks Mark! We sent you a reply so you can find something close to that.)
Jennifer
-- Food Philosophy. Sensuality. Sass.
Great food site
Jennifer, just had a look at your food site, Gilded Fork (I should be working). What a great site: I'm a not quite alcoholic foodie, who is also chief cook at the moment (my wife has a broken leg), so I've bookmarked your site to have a good look at over the weekend, especially those recipes). But, I've had a quick look in the shop section and can't see a product I've been searching out, unsuccessfully, for a year (can't find in shops or online, not even at Millie's Kitchen): that is, you don't sell a long, rectangular but deep fish steamer do you, one that could fit, say, a very big whole salmon? I've seen one I would like twice on Aussie cook programs on the Food Channel, but, as said, cannot source one.
[Um, actually, this was a dumb post to put here, as it's thread hi-jacking. Can't seem to delete it now. Sorry. Jennifer, I've sent same as an email through the contact address on Gilded fork).
Evil anuses
That turn of phrase is, in a word, poetic. Thank you for the laugh -- I needed it.
Jennifer
-- Food Philosophy. Sensuality. Sass.
Government will have to sue itself
Here's a funny thing. I've been sent confirmation query emails from just about all the e-letters I'm subscribed to now, however, two subscriptions stand out as not having sent me advices questioning whether I want to carry on receiving emails from them:
1) Parliamentary press releases (of which I would get between five and fifteen per day.
2) The IRD Policy Unit from whom I get press releases also.
Dear oh dear oh dear.
Good editorial. I was
Good editorial. I was actually going to put my first blog entry up on this yesterday, but was too busy returning emails to the numerous, bank, financial planning, business, and real estate e-letters I am subscribed to. Unlike Lindsay, I use a program called MailWasher which solves the problem of Spam for me quite adequately, and thus the emails I've been answering all this week, to keep receiving the information I want to carry on receiving, has been the worst case of spamming I've had to contend with. And basically, this is spamming by the Government.