Atlas Month—The Glory of Man

Stephen Boydstun's picture
Submitted by Stephen Boydstun on Mon, 2007-10-01 22:11.

I first read Atlas Shrugged in fall term of 1967. I was a sophomore at college. During the summer, I had read The Fountainhead, my first exposure to Rand’s fiction and Rand’s ideas. (Page numbers before the semicolon are for the paperback Signet edition of Atlas; those after are for the first edition of the Random House hardback.)

 

Immediately, I liked:

Dagny (20–25; 12–18)

Rearden (33–38; 26–32)

Francisco (93–112; 94–113)

Galt (652–55; 702–5)

 

My favorite scenes are four:

 

1. The First Run of the John Galt Line

“The lights, hanging on a signal bridge against the sky, were green. There were green lights between the tracks, low over the ground, dropping off into the distance where the rails turned and a green light stood at the curve, against leaves of a summer green that looked as it they, too, were lights.” (228; 239)

to

“She watched the bridge growing to meet them—a small, square tunnel of metal lace work, a few beams criss-crossed through the air, green-blue and glowing, struck by a long ray of sunset light from some crack in the barrier of mountains. . . . She heard the rising, accelerating sound of the wheels—and some theme of music, heard to the rhythm of the wheels, kept tugging at her mind, growing louder. . . .” (236; 247)

 

2. The Crash into the Valley and the Awakening to Galt in Full Sunlight

“She was back at the wheel, she was speeding down the runway, she was rising into the air, her plane like a bullet aimed at two low sparks of red and green light that were twinkling away into the eastern sky.” (646; 693)

to

“. . . as if his faculty of sight were his best-loved tool and its exercise were a limitless, joyous adventure, as if his eyes imparted a superlative value to himself and to the world—to himself for his ability to see, to the world for being a place so eagerly worth seeing. . . . as if he, too, were seeing the long-expected and the never-doubted.” (652; 701–2)

 

3. John and Dagny, Each to Each

“Then she stopped. It was his eyes and hair that she saw first. . . . She saw John Galt among the chain gang of the mindless. . .” (885; 954)

to

“. . . that nothing more could be desired, ever.” (888; 957)

 

4. The Deliverance of Rearden

“Silence was his only sensation, as he sat at the wheel of his car, speeding back down the road to Philadelphia. It was the silence of . . .” (916; 987)

to

“The glare of steel being poured from a furnace shot to the sky beyond the window. A red glow went sweeping slowly over the walls of the office, over the empty desk, over Rearden’s face, as if in salute and farewell.” (927; 999)

 

My favorite philosophical passage is:

“By the grace of reality and the nature of life, man—every man—is an end in himself, he exists for his own sake, and the achievement of his own happiness is his highest moral purpose.” (941; 1014)


( categories: )

Yes, this is timeless beauty

Leonid's picture

Yes, this is timeless beauty which so rarely has been achieved before AS. Somehow, when I read Atlas I always hear second and third piano concerto by Rachmaninov. I wonder why?


Marvelous

Ptgymatic's picture

This is a gift, Stephen. Your selection of quotes gave me a spiritual boost. Thanks.

= Mindy


Philosophy of Romantic Fiction

Stephen Boydstun's picture

Atlas Shrugged as the Culmination of the Romantic Novel.”

 Prof. Bernstein will discuss “the philosophy of romantic fiction as he analyzes, compares, and contrasts Hugo's Les Miserables, Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov, and Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged.”

Wheeling Jesuit University Event - 9/30/08


A Spring Day

Stephen Boydstun's picture

“Little notes of music trembled in hesitation, and burst, and rolled in quick, fine waves, like the thin, clear ringing of glass. Little notes leaped and exploded and laughed, laughed with a full, unconditional, consummate human joy.

. . .

“At dawn, she fell on the edge of a slope. She lay very still, for she knew she would not rise again.

“Far down, below her, an endless plain stretched into the sunrise. . . .

“A lonely little tree stood far away in the plain. It had no leaves. Its slim, rare twigs had gathered no snow. It stretched, tense with the life of a future spring, thin black branches, like arms, into the dawn rising over an endless earth where so much had been possible.”

We the Living (1936)

 

“The notes flowed up, they spoke of rising and they were the rising itself, they were the essence and the form of upward motion, they seemed to embody every human act and thought that had ascent as its motive. It was a sunburst of sound, breaking out of hiding and spreading open. It had the freedom of release and the tension of purpose. It swept space clean and left nothing but the joy of an unobstructed effort. . . .

“The lights of the valley fell in glowing patches on the snow still covering the ground. There were shelves of snow on the granite ledges and on the heavy limbs of the pines. But the naked branches of the birch trees had a faintly upward thrust, as if in confident promise of the coming leaves of spring.”

Atlas Shrugged (1957)

 

“. . . a spring day in 1957; we were walking up Madison Avenue toward the office of Random House, which was in the process of bringing out Atlas Shrugged. She was looking at the city she had always loved most, and now, after decades of rejection and bitter poverty, she had seen the top publishers in that city competing for what she knew, triumphantly, was her masterpiece. She turned to me suddenly and said: ‘Don’t ever give up what you want in life. The struggle is worth it.’. . . . I can still see the look of quiet radiance on her face.”

---Leonard Peikoff (1987)

 


Artistic Inventiveness

Stephen Boydstun's picture

Andrew Bernstein writes that the novel “is an art form that can transport a reader from a character’s innermost private thoughts to the most grand-scale, globe-shaking physical conflict—and dramatize the causal link between the two.” He gives a literary analysis of the novel Atlas Shrugged in the current issue of The Objective Standard [2(3):47–66], which arrived today. The title of this study is “Transforming the Novel: The Literary Revolution in Atlas Shrugged.” The elements addressed are plot-theme, integrative techniques (symbolism, irony, recasting Greek mythology, juxtaposition of opposites), and characterization.

 

See also: The Art of Fiction ~ Ayn Rand

T. Boeckmann, editor (Plume 2000)


New Nobilities

Stephen Boydstun's picture

“In the name of the values that keep you alive, do not let your vision of man be distorted by the ugly, the cowardly, the mindless in those who have never achieved his title. Do not lose your knowledge that man’s proper estate is an upright posture, an intransigent mind and a step that travels unlimited roads. Do not let your fire go out, spark by irreplaceable spark, in the hopeless swamps of the approximate, the not-quite, the not-yet, the not-at-all. Do not let the hero in your soul perish . . .” (AS 1069; cf. 637, 812–13)

“But by my love and hope I beseech you: do not throw away your love and hope! You still feel noble . . . . I knew noble people who lost their highest hope . . . . But by my love and hope I beseech you: do not throw away the hero in your soul!” (Z 30–31)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

“My brothers, we need a new nobility, which is the adversary of all rabble and all despotic rule and which writes anew the word ‘noble’ on new tablets. . . . Not where you come from shall constitute your honor from now on, but instead where you are going! Your will and your foot, which wants to go over and beyond yourself—let that constitute your new honor!” (Z 162–63) 

“He had a caste system of his own: to him, the Taggart children were not Jim and Dagny, but Dagny and Eddie. . . . Eddie asked him once, ‘Francisco, you’re some kind of very high nobility, aren’t you?’ He answered, ‘Not yet’.” (AS 90)

ZThus Spoke Zarathustra. Adrian Del Caro, translator (Cambridge 2006).


Atlas contra God

Stephen Boydstun's picture

Rand introduces her most fundamental axiom on page 1015 of Atlas Shrugged (hb). That is the assertion existence exists. As she introduces the axiom, she says that the moral code that she is overturning and replacing attempts to escape the axiom existence exists. She has already said that the code she means to overturn comes in a variety based on dictates of a supernatural being known as God (1011-12). One of the purposes of Rand's axiom existence exists is to foreclose the possibility of the existence of God.

In her later essay "The Metaphysical v. The Man-Made" (1973), she tells us that her axiom "existence exists" means that the universe exists independently of consciousness (24) and that the universe as a whole "cannot be created or annihilated, that it cannot come into or go out of existence" (25). She says that her fundamental axiom invalidates the question "If there is no God, who created the universe?"

Immediately after introducing the axiom existence exists in AS, Rand introduces axioms concerning consciousness, which are corollaries of grasping the statement existence exists. These are "that something exists which one perceives and that one exists possessing consciousness, consciousness being the faculty of perceiving that which exists" (1015). This characterization of consciousness and self-consciousness rules out the possibility of God as a mind existing before the existence of anything else. "A consciousness conscious of nothing but itself is a contradiction in terms: before it could identify itself as consciousness, it had to be conscious of something" (1015). In these strokes, not only God is swept away. Idealism (Berkleyian, transcendental, or metaphysical), Cartesian skepticism, and materialism (non-existence of mind) are also out of court. (See also, page 1027 and "For the New Intellectual" [1960].)

Readers here know that Rand articulated another axiom:

"To exist is to be something, as distinguished from the nothing of non-existence, it is to be an entity of a specific nature made of specific attributes. Centuries ago, the man who was---no matter what his errors---the greatest of your philosophers, has stated the formula defining the concept of existence and the rule of all knowledge: A is A. A thing is itself. You have never grasped the meaning of his statement. I am here to complete it: Existence is Identity, Consciousness is Identification." (1016)

With this further statement of her axioms, Rand can go on to rule out radical indeterminacy of human nature and to portray the applicability of the law of non-contradiction to the real world known by ordinary experience and science (1016, 1037, 1040-41).

That is not all. With her full complement of axioms on the table, Rand puts them to the purpose of refuting the method of faith and revelation (1018, 1035-36), radical separation of human values from matter or mind (1029-30), supremacy of will or feeling over rational perception of reality (1036-37), skepticism concerning sensory perception (1036, 1040-41), skepticism concerning causality (1037), and skepticism concerning knowledge (1039-40).

On page 1040 Rand says that "an axiom is a statement that identifies the base of knowledge and of any further statement pertaining to knowledge, a statement necessarily contained in all others." She contends that anyone who denies the "axiom of identity" will be unable "to present his theory without using the concept of identity or any concept derived from it." Oh, I almost forgot another purpose to which Rand put her axiom of identity. She used it to bar the "negative way" of approaching God (1035). In Christianity that was an approach going back to Pseudo-Dionysius (c. 500).


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.