who is chatting on SOLO ChatThe Free RadicalPopular contentWho's onlineThere are currently 5 users and 37 guests online.
Online usersPollWhat should the government do about ailing financial institutions? Nothing, except to back off and get out—as any Objectivist knows, intervention is treating the disease with the disease 85% Intervene judiciously—enough to avert a catastrophe that is otherwise imminent 3% Intervene massively—as it's doing 2% Nationalize the whole economy and be done with it. Bring on the USSA! 2% Something else (specify) 8% Total votes: 59
|
Muslims Are Goat-FuckersSubmitted by Lance on Fri, 2007-11-02 05:35.
Writing that piece on Theo van Gogh this morning was tricky. Do I apologetically acknowledge some of the real nasty shit that he said? Or do I white-wash it, and pretend it never happened? I did neither in the end. His words are his, and I am not responsible for them. In the bigger picture, it didn't matter what he said. It also got me thinking on the nature of satire, irony, tongue in cheek and what have you. My reaction to an overtly PC 'tut tut' is to respond louder, brasher and even more obnoxious, gladly overstepping the mark to make a point. Especially if free expression is on the line. You don't like me pointing out that some Muslims are terrorists, specifically citing their religion as sanction for their actions? You don't think I should say that some, and not an amount as small as you think, are bent on world subjugation to Islam? What's that? I shouldn't upset them because that's what leads to the violence? Fuck you then, MUSLIMS ARE GOAT FUCKERS! Yep, that's right, all of 'em! You heard me, FUCK YOU AND YOUR MUSLIM GOAT-MOLESTING FRIENDS! DIE IN A FIRE GOAT-FUCKERS! Now, does anyone who knows me really think I feel that way? I hope not, an actual belief in that sort of bile is just... Now while that might get me a torrent of hate mail from the respective groups, and even some PC tut tutting, NOT A ONE OF THEM would land me an accusation of "phobia" of any kind, or an accusation of racism. What Theo said, wasn't actually all that bad, and I'm starting to see what may have led him to say it... fucking goat-fuckers!
( categories: )
|
User loginFeatured BookNavigation |
Perhaps
in Dubai they are a very advanced society
with grave concerns about the road toll?
As such they are well aware of the problems with Women driving and have done the only sensible thing....namely, to ban it!
If that is so, gosh...I think I will emigrate there!
They Must Fuck Them - I've seem more of them in cars than women!
To be honest Lance. The last time I was in Dubai, I sat on a corner and watched the traffic one afternoon for about 50 minutes.
I never once saw an actual female driver. However I did see many goats drive by. A lot of them in Mercedes vehicles.
On one of the few occasions that I actually saw women in vehicles, they were relegated to the back seat whilst the goat held pole position in the front.
I suppose they were the nanny's ? (snort - snigger)
It was so depressingly
It was so depressingly predictable...
Lance here's one
This guy's response to my email on his Solo/objectivism critique:
"Hi Greg,
Thanks for your email - the post does naturally contain rhetoric and following hearing from Duncan, I did not realise that SOLO allowed non-Objectivists to post, which admittedly does slightly lessen my concern (working under the assumption you subscribe to Objectivism, and not to racist filth like http://www.solopassion.com/node/3589 and other similar posts on SOLO).
If I am correct in assuming that you are not a racist nor have a radical hatred of Muslims or any other religious group, I have no problem with your movement besides it's stance on collectivism and economics.
Kindest regards,
Oliver Woods"
Fuck the Muslims!
The silent ones are cringeing and stupid. Their beliefs are stupid-on-stilts. As I said in my Salient article, "All Muslims believe nonsense. Some Muslims do terror." Fuck 'em all, as they bend towards Mecca. The hell with their pathetic "sensibilities."
Deliberate offense: I think it would not be counter-productive..
...at all. If EVERY infidel had donned a Muhammad Bomb Head T-Shirt when that shit hit the fan, thus deliberately offending the entirety of the followers of Islam, it would have been very productive indeed. The followers of Islam would have known right there and then that you don't fuck with the West lightly. It would have been very demoralising for them, and rightly so. However, because so very few cared to do that, because it's so much more important to be polite and not offend, they think that the West is a pushover. They just might be right.
I think it is OK, in terms
I think it is OK, in terms of the right to free expression... but I also think it is mean-spirited and mostly counter-productive. The "goat-fucker" example would take a bit more provocation to get out of me than I have stated, and would generally be a "spur of the moment" response to PC drivel and stupidity. While I adhere to no one having the right to not be offended, I wouldn't take pleasure in deliberately hurting the feelings of decent people. 'Muslims' being such a wide ranging target of course, there'd be some bewildered people wondering what they had done to warrant such abuse.
Lance -Now I'm confused
Lance -
Now I'm confused about your perspective. Do you think it is ok to deliberately offend and provoke for your cause or not?
Cheers,
Reed
Ummmmm
Lance, when you say things like:
Communists are pig-fuckers!
Marxists rape felines!
...I am right behind you!
And quite right, too!
I look forward to seeing
I look forward to seeing this quoted elsewhere, completely out of context, as an example of how SOLO harbours hate-mongers. Like my dear old gran used to say: "Fuck 'em if they can't take a joke"