A present for the silent feminists, courtesy of Jihad enterprises. And still she appeases.

I'm pleased you've finally come to that realisation.

Wake the fuck up, man. Don't you see a pattern in your appeasement? You supported the vile Peron until several hours after the last minute. You are still looking for excuses for Islamo-Fascism. You were going to vote for Ron Paul until I screamed at you. How much "hard evidence" does it take to get you permanently out of amoral catatonia? Leave the Islamo-Fascism to the anarcho-Saddamites here. You are way better than they. Man up, man!

Linz

Then let me present a very clear case of exactly what you are talking about Duncan. Courtesy of SIOE:

Islam as Conspiracy
When one discusses the existential threat posed to European nations by their large and rapidly growing Muslim populations with those not yet convinced of it, one of the most commonly-heard objections is that the notion smacks of a conspiracy theory. ‘So they’ve come here to take over, have they?’ goes the incredulous response. This line of thought, though misconceived, is superficially persuasive to some degree and not easily refutable by simply pointing out that some small minority of Muslims in each country is in fact quite vocal about its desires in this respect. As such, it deserves some discussion here.

The ‘Good Cop, Bad Cop’ analogy has often been suggested to provide a model for understanding Muslim behaviour in certain regards: Bad Cop carries out terrorist atrocity, Good Cop expresses profound sorrow but suggests that attacks will continue as long as certain demands are not met. However, in this model the Good Cop and the Bad Cop act on the basis of an explicit understanding of their roles, in pursuit of an objective agreed upon in advance. As one assumes that Islamist lobby groups and would-be terrorists are not actively colluding, we must answer the question of how an analogous coordination could take place, or abandon the model.

The coordinating force in question is, of course, Islam itself. Given the religious totalitarianism intrinsic to it and the imperative it contains to expand the geographical domain of that totalitarianism, it is hardly surprising that Muslims in a non-Muslim society should pursue Islamization, and that they should pursue it in a variety of ways given the broad spectrum of personalities, backgrounds, skills, and social standings they will be drawn from. There is no reason why Muslims cannot reference the actions of other Muslims they have never been in contact with in attempting to convince Europeans to meet their demands. Indeed, they will be extremely likely to do so, as these actions can comprise the single most obvious dilemma facing said Europeans with respect to their Muslim populations.

Consider the suggestion of the Muslim Council of Britain to the British government that incorporating Muslim holidays into the official calendar and allowing Shari’a-based divorce could help to reduce the rage felt by the UK’s Muslim population and prevent future terrorist attacks. The manifest implausibility of this notion makes its opportunistic nature clear. The MCB may have genuinely disapproved of the attack and may have silently cheered it, but the opportunity would have been utilized regardless. Thus, terrorists and lobbyists achieve a high degree of teamwork without even having any specific knowledge of each other’s existence. Asking who acts as a coordinator would be equivalent to asking who ‘coordinates’ the anti-Semitism of Nazis, be it expressed through political activism or attacks on Jews. In this case, Nazism itself is the sole and sufficient coordinator. An alternative formulation would be to say that the Islamization conspiracy is coordinated by none other than Islam itself, the invisible hand that takes the activities of millions of Muslims unknown to each other and combines them into a coherent whole, clearly visible to those with the will to see it.

What is most interesting about this conspiracy is its public nature. The texts, doctrine, laws, and history of Islam, together with much analysis of the same, are more available to non-Muslims than ever before, along with a steady flow of news about their global behaviour, and a large and growing number of Muslims who explicit declare the supremacist nature of their religion. Despite this, it remains quite invisible to huge numbers of otherwise intelligent non-Muslims, who assume the problems caused with remarkable consistency by Muslims and only Muslims, wherever they are to be found in large numbers, are teething troubles that would disappear if only some list of conditions were fulfilled.

There are surely many people of good will in European countries who are not as concerned as they should be about Islam due to their inability to distinguish between harmless concessions to a community genuinely eager to fit in, and the latest of the thousand cuts that Islam hopes to defeat us with. Formulating a strategy for helping such people see why even minor concessions should be opposed, perhaps in the manner outlined above, could be a valuable activity.

Not at all. In fact, I have reached the conclusion that the ends of the moderate Muslims are functionally identical to the radicals: they both want Sharia imposed upon the West.

The only significant difference between the moderates and the radicals is their means: the latter will use terrorism and physical violence, while the former leverage Western fears of terrorism and violence to impose Sharia through the democratic process.

My gut feeling - although without hard evidence at this point - is that the two are being co-ordinated at some level to take advantage of this peculiar synergy.

---
Buy and wear InfidelGear - 100% of all InfidelGear profit goes to SOLO!

What a terrifyingly vague presser.

Do you still expect anything better, Duncan?

What a load of shit.

There was no crime, it was a wholly innocent and naive... The worst you could say about her actions is that she was inadvertently naive.

So if she had intended to cause offense by naming the toy Mohammed, she should have been jailed? What a terrifyingly vague presser.

---
Buy and wear InfidelGear - 100% of all InfidelGear profit goes to SOLO!

At least the Muslim Council did actually speak out. However ironically this is, given that Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari, the leader of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB), has warned that Britain must beware of becoming like Nazi Germany.

I think the council would say Gillian Gibbons should have been punished if she had actually intended to insult Mohammed - (they wouldn't be very consistent Muslims otherwise).

It's quite strange the court in Sudan didn't ask if US Americans had not been insulted too from "Teddy" (derived from US President Theodore Roosevelt) being named Mohammed

That's a breath of fresh air from the Muslim Council of Britain.

I do have one question though, if the decision to name the toy Muhammed/Mohammed was deliberate and not 'naive' per se, would they still consider it to not be a crime?

Teddy row teacher found guilty
By Nick Britten, Aislinn Simpson and Blake Evans-Pritchard
Last Updated: 8:02pm GMT 29/11/2007

The British teacher arrested in Sudan after allowing pupils to call the class teddy bear Mohammed has been jailed for 15 days.

Gillian Gibbons, 54, was found guilty of insulting religion and inciting hatred at the end of a day long court hearing in Khartoum amid scenes of protest from extreme Islamist groups who had called for her execution.

The reaction from the Sudanese has sparked outrage from Muslim groups in the UK and has clearly angered the British Government.

David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, who earlier summoned the Sudan ambassador for an emergency meeting at Whitehall during which he pressed for Mrs Gibbons’ immediate release, said he would be ordering him back to Whitehall to explain the sentence, which he called “disappointing”.

A Foreign Office spokesman said: “We are extremely disappointed with the verdict and the Foreign Secretary has summoned the Sudanese ambassador to explain the decision.”

The 15 days will be taken from when Mrs Gibbons was arrested on Sunday, and last night a diplomatic expert said it was likely she would not have to serve her whole sentence and could be released in the next 48 hours.

The Muslim Council of Britain, an umbrella group of British Muslim organisations, called the sentence “completely unjustified”.

“(Mrs Gibbons) should never have been arrested in the first place, let alone convicted of any crime,” Muslim Council of Britain spokesman Inayat Bunglawala said.

“There was no crime, it was a wholly innocent and naive... The worst you could say about her actions is that she was inadvertently naive. She should not be put in prison for that.”

Link

I trust you'll be present Monday night to receive your citation?

Pamela has posted this editorial on her website - Atlas Shrugs with the link to Solo.

No.7 on the Scoop most read at the moment!

If DPW get Auckland airport, they also own Emirates. Guess which Airline gets all the cream?

As for a free market, if the world gets an Islamic global landlord. "Who ever has the most gold makes all the rules".

Part of the bigger picture is to make Dubai the worlds major hub.

"As with other new Dubai projects, the Dubai World Central scheme's public launch has been supported by a promotional barrage. Official press statements have sought to suggest that in just 18 months the emirate will build the world's largest airport, with six parallel runways, each 4.5km long, with 800-metre deparation zones between them and three terminals. "By the end of 2007, the new Dubai World Central Airport and its six runways will be the world's largest passenger and cargo hub capable of handling 120m passengers almost double London Heathrow's current handling capacity. It will also have the capacity to handle 12m tons of cargo annually, compared to Heathrow's current 1.3m tons," the government announced.

But although construction of a first runway and terminal has begun and is set for completion by end-2007 it is cargo and charter flights, and executive jets, that will be DWC's initial customers. Fulfilment of ambitions to create the world's largest air transport hub will only follow over coming years and decades, ...........

The parent vehicle for both the airport and surrounding urban schemes is the new DWC parastatal, chaired by Sheikh Saeed Ahmed Bin Saeed Al-Maktoum.The ruling family is thus taking the lead in another megaproject a Dubai hallmark. DWC's boss is already a leading figure as chairman of Emirates Airline and president of Dubai's Department of Civil Aviation. Sheikh Saeed also heads the Dubai Aerospace Enterprise body announced by the emirate's government in February as a vehicle for developing aviation industries and services, with day to day operations overseen by managing director Mohammed Al-Zarouni......

....The venerable Islamic Development Bank is to take a major structural step forward by setting up a dedicated trade finance arm, with a new export-import bank to be called the International Islamic Trade Finance Corporation

''''committing more than $38bn during its lifetime to support over 3,000 projects in its 56 member countries AND MUSLIM COMMUNITIES.......

While many banks and risk mitigators have pulled back from the Islamic Republic amid fears of an eventually violent confrontation with the United States and its allies, some specialist banks and private market insurers are choosing to stay in the Iranian market because of the very attractive margins on offer.....

One route into Iran, private banks in Tehran told GSN, could be to use leasing and other operations that are being run through Iranian operations based in Dubai (GSN 782/12). One senior Tehran-based private sector banker suggested running goods into Dubai on short terms, for them to be re-exported to their Iranian end-users on five-year leasing terms. Local banks such as fast growing private sector enterprises EN Bank and Parsian Bank have been developing these operations.

Tehran is looking at a range of routes around its potential problems if the nuclear crisis escalates further......

The Saudi government intends to remain a big player in the market, despite the inflow of foreign firms......

Meanwhile, Barclays Capital recently co-managed a $3.5bn sukuk (Islamic bond) issued by Dubai's Ports, Customs and Free Zones Corporation. The issuers brought Barclays Capital into the deal to help place the issue internationally, while Dubai Islamic Bank distributed the bond in the Middle East. Elsewhere, Citigroup recently created the first sukuk bond index with Dow Jones to track the price of these instruments......."

http://www.zawya.com/story.cfm...

would happily sell the Port of Auckland tomorrow as it should not be owned by the State.

With regards to your hypothesis, it is simply not possible to have a monopoly situation in a free market...(let alone 'World Domination')

"I create nothing. I own"

These businesses vehemently promote Sharia.

You would sell our major port to an Islamic dictatorship?

The Strategic Implications

The goal of Islamists, following in the footsteps of Muhammad is to create the Islamic kingdom of God on earth. The strategy to obtain this goal in our lifetime includes the control of the world's energy infrastructure, the transportation systems, currency, media, elections, immigration and education. The control of the port facilities is hence a critical element. Foreign ownership, in and of itself, although important, is not as significant as the strategy and goals of the owner. In the case of DP World ownership, my hypothesis is that their plan for utilization of these strategic infrastructure resources is to accomplish the ultimate goal of world domination of the sea borne transportation infrastructure. In similar moves, a newly-formed Dubai consortium unveiled plans to bid for the development and operation of airports in China, India and the Middle East, a market they estimate to be worth $400 bln. The consortium comprises DAE Airports and six other top companies in the United Arab Emirates .......

fleecing these people of $7.5 Billion is a great thing and should be seen as so.

What happens is something like this...

They spend $7.5 billion, this is money outside America coming into America.
Citigroup decides not to put it in their bottom drawer but rather to spend the money paying their staff and suppliers, or (due to the nature of Citigroup's business) make loans to its customers.

Their staff and suppliers spend their money in America, creating economic activity with money which has come into the American economy from outside.
The people who receive housing or business loans or overdrafts from Citigroup spend that money.

The people who receive the money which is spent also go out and spend it, the people receiving this money spend it...and so on.

After a while all this spending...this economic activity, is providing employment and wellbeing and it all emanates from new money entering the economy from outside.

All foreign investment in a Country has this result which is why it is a good thing and should be widely encouraged, and I only wish the brain damaged shareholders of Auckland International Airport could see this.

In short, it amounts to a 'free gift' to the economy.

"I create nothing. I own"

..."Jefferson knew what he was talking about. Forget bio-fuels, you could probably power half of the globe by hooking his corpse up to a generator, it's spinning so fast by now."

Damn straight! What did TJ know then that most people have conveniently forgotten now?

Sandi, great piece.

I agree 100% with your initial post, but not with the 'creeping Sharia' concern on the Citigroup transaction (as, indeed, I had no problem with the Dubai consortium trying to takeover Auckland Airport).

These business interests have as much to lose from Sharia Law and Islamofascism as we do, indeed, capitalism may well be the best way to start pulling this culture out of the Stone Age. And with the money they're putting up, there is no way they're going to sabotage their operations being invested in.

Creeping Sharia.

NEW YORK/DUBAI (Reuters) - Citigroup Inc (NYSE:C) is selling up to 4.9 percent of itself for $7.5 billion to the Gulf Arab emirate of Abu Dhabi, giving the largest U.S. bank fresh capital as it wrestles with the subprime mortgage crisis and the resignation of its chief executive.

that is fairly sick ...surely the British Government can do something and get her released?!?!

"I create nothing. I own"

.... to my day. I hope every sick fuck whose first impulse is to prattle on about "moderate Muslims" whenever Islam is called on its vileness watches these clips. That includes the sick fucks from Salient, though, since they're not human, I wouldn't expect them to be moved.

Has anyone seen < a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/4289963a12.html">this?

A British primary school teacher is in a Sudanese jail facing 40 lashes if she's convicted of insulting Islam's prophet Muhammed by letting children name a teddy bear after him.

... just when you thought Islam couldn't press any more salt into the open wound cleaved by its ideology.

And once again we hear the calamitous roar from the moderate Muslims outraged at the barbaric acts being carried out in the name of their beloved Prophet...

This is what Helen is appeasing, and what of a stoning (right click and save) or perhaps a good old hand cutting (right click and save) treatment for thieves, as ordered by the Quran.

but God help you if you dont pay your speeding ticket or criticise the bitch and her acolytes.

Maybe we should try and get a couple of these over here to come and tell why they left this religion of peace.

I admit that reason is a small and feeble flame, a flickering torch by stumblers carried in the starless night, -- blown and flared by passion's storm, -- and yet, it is the only light. Extinguish that, and nought remains.- - Robert Green Ingersoll

microfilm reader

Further what possible motivation does Saudi Arabia have to make any changes? Half their population (women) is utterly subjugated, the rest almost utterly, they are incredibly wealthy and friendly with the most powerful nation on the planet, a nation that refuses to condemn any of their ridiculous, stinking, primitive, barbaric actions!

"I am for free commerce with all nations, political connection with none, and little or no diplomatic establishment."

Jefferson knew what he was talking about. Forget bio-fuels, you could probably power half of the globe by hooking his corpse up to a generator, it's spinning so fast by now.

---
Buy and wear InfidelGear - 100% of all InfidelGear profit goes to SOLO!

Nice find Mike, I'd heard that the US had expressed 'astonishment' which makes 'dismay' sound almost like a declaration of war! Gutless wonders all. I've taken the liberty of lifting the entire exchange from the site you linked:

"QUESTION: Can we return to the case of the Saudi rape victim and her punishment?

MR. MCCORMACK: I am not aware of any direct contact with the Saudis on this issue."

Pathetic!

This: "We can express our views about that, but ultimately it's going to be up to the individual countries to decide whether or not they are going to take into account the views from the outside world."
So they CAN express their views... so why didn't they?(beyond of course 'astonishment')

Further what possible motivation does Saudi Arabia have to make any changes? Half their population (women) is utterly subjugated, the rest almost utterly, they are incredibly wealthy and friendly with the most powerful nation on the planet, a nation that refuses to condemn any of their ridiculous, stinking, primitive, barbaric actions!

/imsopissedofficouldspewemoticon

Excellent Sandi...keep exposing the scum.

As Ayn suggested: (from The Ayn Rand Letter, vol. 1, No. 7 January 3, 1972

"What Can One Do?"

I will say: when you ask "What can one do?"—the answer is "SPEAK" (provided you know what you are saying).

A few suggestions: do not wait for a national audience. Speak on any scale open to you, large or small—to your friends, your associates, your professional organizations, or any legitimate public forum. You can never tell when your words will reach the right mind at the right time. You will see no immediate results—but it is of such activities that public opinion is made.

Do not pass up a chance to express your views on important issues. Write letters to the editors of newspapers and magazines, to TV and radio commentators and, above all, to your Congressmen (who depend on their constituents). If your letters are brief and rational (rather than incoherently emotional), they will have more influence than you suspect.

The opportunities to speak are all around you. I suggest that you make the following experiment: take an ideological "inventory" of one week, i.e., note how many times people utter the wrong political, social and moral notions as if these were self-evident truths, with your silent sanction.

Then make it a habit to object to such remarks—no, not to make lengthy speeches, which are seldom appropriate, but merely to say: "I don't agree." (And be prepared to explain why, if the speaker wants to know.) This is one of the best ways to stop the spread of vicious bromides.

(If the speaker is innocent, it will help him; if he is not, it will undercut his confidence the next time.) Most particularly, do not keep silent when your own ideas and values are being attacked.

Microfilm Reader

I admit that reason is a small and feeble flame, a flickering torch by stumblers carried in the starless night, -- blown and flared by passion's storm, -- and yet, it is the only light. Extinguish that, and nought remains.- - Robert Green Ingersoll

The Bush administration's filled with cultural relativists of the most extreme kind.

Witness the delicious weaselliness of State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, answering a question about the case from a reporter at a daily press briefing: "We think it's essential that every individual enjoy basic universal rights that we believe every person on the planet should enjoy, and those include freedom of expression, freedom to choose freely one's leaders. The Saudi Government has committed itself to a pathway of reform, as have other states in the region. That pathway of reform is going to -- each of those states is going to go down that pathway at its own pace, though...Look, you have a situation that I think most individuals, for example in our country, just don't understand. We don't understand how something like this could happen. That said, these kinds of decisions are going to have to be decisions that the people of that country, in this case Saudi Arabia, are going to have to take for themselves. We can express our views about that, but ultimately it's going to be up to the individual countries to decide whether or not they are going to take into account the views from the outside world."

jolly splendid opinion editorial, Sandi!

I think Mrs Davis shows enormous contempt and hypocrisy for her rather muted response to this dreadful punishment.

Mind you, having moved house in the last couple of weeks into the Mt Albert Electorate of Mrs Davis I can see (demographically) why she is reluctant to get too animated in her criticism of Mu-slime behaviour and sharia punishments....she does not want to end up like John Howard and lose her own seat

"I create nothing. I own"

Sandi,

Great op-ed!

Michael

http://www.MichaelNewberry.com

Great stuff Sandi. I sure do hope you've emailed a copy of this to all the relevant ministers mentioned, including Clark and Bradford (afterall her anti-smacking law is supposed to be to stop shit like this, isn't it; oh no, silly me, just incriminate honest, loving NZ parents).

Anyway, as a regular emailer to various Ministers I can vouch they do read their emails: I can send you a pdf of all their email addresses if you like.

Excellent release... well put. Very KASS!!!!

LOVE the point about Saudi only having one thing in common with NZ... criticism of government not tolerated.

Helen's comments are deplorable! Stupid, stupid bitch.

For a great Op-Ed on a subject that has made me, and I am sure others, feel sick about.