who is chatting on SOLO ChatThe Free RadicalPopular contentWho's onlineThere are currently 4 users and 18 guests online.
Online usersPollElection 2008: Who Will Win? Obama by a landslide 13% McCain by a landslide 23% Obama comfortably 11% McCain comfortably 23% Either narrowly 30% Total votes: 47
|
It is all entrepreneurshipSubmitted by milesian on Fri, 2005-12-02 05:11.
I have been self-employed for over 30 years. Usually, I had some kind of "job." In two cases, I held the same "employment" for two years. However, in both cases, I earned money from other sources -- and in both cases, I viewed my "employer" as my client. I was in charge of my effort. I sold my skills because I perceived myself as having marketable services to offer. It is easy to say that I "work as a security guard." Indeed, I do. I also get paid to edit, The Mich-Matist, a numismatic quarterly. I get paid to write a monthly column for Numismatist magazine of the ANA. I also work as a public programs presenter at the Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum. My model is Bert in Mary Poppins. In the late 1990s, just before the Dot.Com implosion, "intrepreneuring" was a buzzword. Corporations were supposed to encourage managers and other workers to consider their budgets as investments and then to grow their activities to earn greater "profits" and more "customers." Of course, it was corporate baloney. However, it is how I have lived all my working life. As a technical writer and programmer, I went from one contract to another. I have carried out some of these under my own business name, Mercury Atwell (mercury@well.com has been a username of mine since 1989). I always had more than one source of income. Often, I write features for regional and local business magazines. However, I have also sold cookbooks door-to-door and sanitized a hospital ahead of a state inspection. I worked as a retail clerk for NASA before working for NASA as a technical writer. The first job was through Kelly, the second through Manpower. Both were temporary. I am a member of the Ann Arbor Chamber of Commerce. With the holidays here, I am sending out letters to other Chamber members offering to fill in as their admistrative assistants when their regular gals (most typically by 99%) are on vacation. It is work I have done before, for advertising agencies, for instance. I am a tested and proved expert at Microsoft Office Suite. I like meeting people. I have no intention of making a career of that. I do not intend to open an agency, or file corporation papers for it, or get licensed. It is just something I do. Karl Marx epitomized the complaint that all workers are forced to sell their labor as the only commodity they own. Of course, that is all that anyone has to sell, even if are a diamond merchant. The diamonds are just carbon cystals. How well you succeed depends on your ability to find and motivate buyers. Ayn Rand accepted the Marxist challenge at face value and proved that all workers are not equal, neither in their abilities nor their self-perceptions.
( categories: )
|
User loginFeatured BookNavigation |
Paid for my opinions ...
Ross Liberius cited history: "... the failure to see the symbiosis between capital & labour."
As an Objectivist, I see not a symbiosis, but an equivalence. The government of the state of Michigan has been struggling with "downturns in the automotive industry" since 1980 -- and neither smokestack Republicans nor labor union Democrats have found a solution, because there is none. Among the recommendations that is back on the board this time around is "tax credits" for "capital investment." My response via a Community Commentary public radio broadcast in 1983 was that everyone ought to be entitled to them. Buying a lawn mower is a capital investment. Today, I include just about everything I buy under that rubric.
Is a new computer not a capital investment, a tool of production, for a writer?
Even in my role as a security guard, what is a pen or a flashlight, but a tool of production?
Last night, I spent $60 at a local Redwing store. I bought overshoes (galoshes; rubbers) for a pair of shoes and for a pair of boots. I had been to a Big Box store and tried to buy "Totes" at $10/pair, but they did not fit, only came in the wrong styles, and one pair tore apart in my hand as I pulled it on ("Made in Canada"). So, I invested the heavy money in heavy equipment.
(By the way, I was paid for that Community Commentary; being a commentator was a little gig I had back then.)
________________________________________________________
"I have slipped the surly bonds of Earth
and danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings."
Well, Michael, that reads
Well, Michael, that reads like a CV.
Re Marx. His problem, as with all socialists, was the failure to see the symbiosis between capital & labour.
That said, there *is* a difference between the employer-worker and the client-contractor relationships. And that is, that in the former a more demonstrative control exists between operators than it does in the latter. This is due to the physical & temporal conditions of the relationship. And it is real. That doesn't mean I advocate any special considerations in law for those relationships (I'm an objectivist, after all), but it does mean that when it comes to managing them some special considerations need to be observed. Unions, for one.
Ross