Death to Islam! [Reprised to mark latest Islamatrocities in Orlando. Oooops. Make that Istanbul. Ooops! Make that Nice.]

Lindsay Perigo's picture
Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Mon, 2006-02-06 23:49

[Note—June 13, 2016, following the killing of 50+ attendees at an Orlando gay nightclub: I hope LGBT moronnials, the Pink Swastika carriers who support the Islamappeasing agenda of Obama and remain silent, as he does, about Islam's routine killing of gays while loudly propounding a totalitarian PC agenda of their own, will be awakened by yesterday's slaughters to the nature of Islam in particular and tyranny in general.]

No, this is not a call to genocide. I leave that to the Islamo-fascist filth who yearn to perpetrate it: “Death to Israel!” “Death to America!” “Death to the Infidel!” and so on.

They’ve been out in force recently, these squalid savages, these bigoted barbarians, these hysterical humanity-haters, these tawdry terrorists, these god-ridden grotesqueries, these ignoble ignoramuses, these genocidal jihadists … burning flags and embassies because their super-superstitious sensibilities were offended by some cartoons in a Danish newspaper. In London they took advantage of the freedom they so despise, this murderous mass of Muslim maggotry, to infest the streets, sporting signs such as “Freedom Go To Hell!” “Prepare For The REAL Holocaust!” and “Annihilate [massacre, exterminate/butcher/behead] those who would insult Islam!” In the name of humanity, Islam must be put to death. Not by nuking, but by shaming. Not by the sword (though if the maggots leave us no alternative we should not hesitate to use it) but by the word. Human beings worthy of the title must rise up and shout in irresistible unison: “Enough of this primordial primitivism! We who are civilised are revolted by it and shall rebuff it at every turn!” Muslims must discover rationality and decency; Westerners must rediscover them, and, as a matter of urgency, speak up for them! All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for cowards to appease it—and Islam is the locus of evil in the contemporary world.

There’s been far too much appeasement of it. The U.S. State Department, with merely a nod in the direction—rather than a ringing defence—of freedom of the press, has pronounced the cartoons, lampooning Mohammed, “unacceptable” because they cause “offence” to Muslims. Would cartoons ridiculing Stalin have been deemed unacceptable for causing offence to communists? Has the State Department forgotten that there is no such thing as a right not to be offended? That free speech includes the right to say things others will find offensive? CNN has declined to screen the cartoons “out of respect for Islam.” Leaving aside that Islam is not worthy of an iota of respect (while the right to believe in it or any other form of nonsense is worthy of utmost respect), has CNN forgotten that the freedom of publication on which it is so reliant is endangered by such cowardly self-censorship? Even the Danish newspaper that originally published the cartoons—precisely as a challenge to the maggots’ insistence that their feelings be given special consideration—has apologised for causing offence. Freedom, and with it the world, is perishing from an orgy of apologising to a global harem of empty-headed, malevolent umbrage-takers.

Let us not forget that while Muslims are the locus of totalitarianism, they are aided and abetted by an array of allied ayatollahs, woeful witch-doctors of every hue. I quote from the Horror File of the upcoming Free Radical:

“Christian and Muslim church leaders have rallied to stop a South Park episode, that depicts the Virgin Mary bleeding, from going to air. … The episode, which the CanWest channel plans to screen in May, shows a statue of the Virgin Mary bleeding. A cartoon character of Pope Benedict is called to investigate and declares she is menstruating. ‘Chicks bleed all the time’ he says. … Catholic Communications Director Lyndsay Freer said representatives of the Council of Christians and Jews and Council of Christians and Muslims, Anglican Bishops, the Salvation Army and other church leaders have signed the letter requesting that C4 not screen the episode. ‘The letter pointed out it would give offence to a great many people.’ (Dominion Post, January 30, 2006)"

Yes, a global harem of umbrage-takers. Reassuringly, C4 is going to screen the episode regardless of these two-bit totalitarians. And television channels and most major newspapers in New Zealand have not only published the Danish cartoons but defended their right to do so. The Dominion Post, in an editorial that is superior to most of what has come out of mainstream American media on the subject, said:

“Modern society rests on the contest of ideas, the ability to question perceived wisdom and to challenge authority. Without that contest, and without the right to free speech that makes it possible, societies stultify and become entrenched in their beliefs. That freedom to question and to challenge must include the right to be offensive, to affront people’s most heartfelt beliefs, even to disparage that which they hold sacred. Otherwise it is an empty freedom. … There have been earlier cultural confrontations between the West and a resurgent Islam, beginning with the death sentence pronounced in 1989 on author Salmon Rushdie for The Satanic Verses, and including the murder in 2004 of Dutch film-maker Theo van Gogh after he made a film dealing with violence against Islamic women. They are confrontations the West cannot afford to lose. The right to freedom of speech is a precious one that must be defended.”

It cannot be defended—indeed, it can only be betrayed—by apologetic weasel-worders appeasing militant, murderous morons whose savage pseudo-sensibilities have been stirred, not by sticks and stones, but by words. May men of righteous rationality reignite the flame of reason and fight an unapologetic philosophical jihad in its holy name, that it may illumine the globe and save the world from another Dark Ages. Death to Islam—and all forms of tyranny over the minds of men!

( categories: )

Magnificent Milo!

Lindsay Perigo's picture


One of the first things to disappear in the wake of a terrorist attack is humour. That’s one of the things they want. They want to make us afraid.

When we’re afraid, we don’t dare laugh in case it’s the wrong thing to do.

But laughing is one of the ways we show we’re okay, and that there can be a future beyond what has happened.

We aren’t going to beat Islamic terror only with tanks and bombs. We’re going to beat it with ideology. We’re going to beat it with laughter — by showing the people who live in countries ruled by dictators and thugs that they will not make us afraid.

By showing them that the West is best.

That’s how the Berlin Wall fell. People in East Germany knew that West Germany was better.

The freedoms enjoyed in this country, the best country, are, or should be the envy of the world. And when people are truly free, they laugh. They laugh about everything.

It’s often said that in order to find out who is in power, you have to find out who you’re not allowed to laugh about.

Today that’s feminists, Black Lives Matter and Islam. Those are the groups that will get you into trouble if you crack jokes about. You’ll have your newspaper column taken away. You’ll be banned from Twitter.

Of all these groups, Islam is the most inherently hilarious.

Their outfits are hilarious. Ridiculous. Is there anything more comically sinister than the sight of a herd of women swathed in black bedsheets?

Anything more unintentionally ironic about a religion that hates gays that gets its men in a room together 5 times a day to stick their asses in the air?

Is there anything more richly amusing than the crybully faux-victimhood of those who worry about “islamophobia” and hijab-pulling in the wake of terror attacks that leave dozens dead?

Is there — and perhaps this is just my gallows humour — anything more darkly funny than a religion so thin-skinned that cartoons designed to provoke it give rise to deadly shootings, as though to prove the point of those French cartoonists?

Is there anything more preposterous than the phrase “The Religion of Peace”?

Islam is really funny.

But it’s also sinister. And as a gay man, I really don’t like it very much.

It’s easy to bleat about Christianity. It’s low-hanging fruit. It’s more difficult, and it takes more bravery, to criticise Islam with sincerity and seriousness. And with jokes.

Most people don't care,

Richard Wiig's picture

Most people don't care, Andrew. You can tell them all you like (and I think most people know by now) but they do not care.

They have no problem owning

Richard Wiig's picture

They have no problem owning up. I remember Ashraf Choudhary when he was in parliament saying that death for apostasy was fine for an Islamic country, along with death for homosexuality and adultery, but not in New Zealand because it isn't an Islamic country. That should have ended his parliamentary career there and then, but it didn't.


Andrew Atkin's picture

Absolutely no religion that kills you for leaving it can be seen as benign. It's on a whole new level. It's evil.

....I know I'm stating the obvious, but I wanted to say it anyway.

Also most people in the West will not know that you get the death penalty for leaving Islam, in Islamic countries. And most people will not know that apostasy, the word, means 'leaving your faith'.

My point is that this is where the mass-public conversation needs to begin. Basic facts that kill the aura of religious innocence.

Dawkins vs The Filth

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Richard Dawkins finally gets a piece of Islamotrash to own up:

It isn't actually an

Richard Wiig's picture

It isn't actually an Objectivist position. It's a leftist position.

"The Objectivist position on this is one of their most retarded (and unlikeable) stances."

Japan - 2 rapists out of 27

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

Well, Poland doesn't have Islamic terror attakcs. What aspects of its foreign policy with respect to the Islamic world do you think are causing such a low rate of Jihadist attacks?

That right there *refutes* the entire Objectivist (and NeoCon) foreign policy. I would use Japan as well. But guess what? Japan accepted 27 refugees (why) and:

Of the 27 taken in, two have already raped Japanese women. These people are savages from a savage culture. They should be shamed worldwide by kicking them out everywhere and locking them into the confines of their historic lands. We should not be importing them or fighting to improve their home countries.

The Objectivist position on this is one of their most retarded (and unlikeable) stances.

Pries Beheaded In France & Another Question For Brook

Neil Parille's picture

If only we had nuked Saudi Arabia.

It's getting hard to keep up with these attacks. There was one reported yesterday in Germany, but I'm not sure if the story referred to a previous attack.

Mr. Brook: You said that the problem isn't caused by immigration but by bad foreign/military policy. Well, Poland doesn't have Islamic terror attakcs. What aspects of its foreign policy with respect to the Islamic world do you think are causing such a low rate of Jihadist attacks?

Explosion in Ansbach

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

How much of this will Europeans take? Listen to Molyneux describe the type of Muslim torture that the Leftist media is deliberately covering up:

This is our enemy, both of them: the Left and Islam.

And yet, go to any Ortho or Orgoist website or Twitter feed and what will you find? "Left boot, right boot", "Trump is fascist", "don't blame immigrants blame collectivism", bla, bla, bla.

Really, its getting to the point where I can see people of good will turning to some authoritarian right wing political movement. Muslims are killing pregnant women in the streets and Leftist politicians want to import more of them.

And so do Objectivists.

A Question For Yaron Brook

Neil Parille's picture

A pregnant German woman and her unborn child were just murdered by a knife wielding Syrian immigrant.

Is there anything that would prompt you to reconsider your support for open immigration of Muslims?


Neil Parille's picture

The book arrived. I've started reading it. Unfortunately music isn't my strong suit.


Lindsay Perigo's picture

If group A has an average IQ of 100 and group B has an average IQ of 85 they will produce different cultures. You've got to be a pomowonker not to realize that.

That's "pomowanker," not "pomowonker." You've got to be a pomowanker not to realise that. Sticking out tongue

Actually, I'm wondering why NIOF should be so difficult for dummies to grasp. These days, it's the so-called intelligentsia who don't seem to get it.

I once got into terrible trouble for saying that it takes a brain to appreciate Rachmaninoff. That's the truth of it. No gathering of Rach fans will ever be stupid ... or violent. Non-whites often get, and perform, Rach. More than can be said for OrgOism, when you think about it.

Has my Mario book arrived?


Doug Bandler The Second's picture a rabid rationalist on this (and other) subjects. He is incapable of ever coming into contact with reality in this area. To him a war against immigration is a war against the entire system of liberty. He's unwilling to see anything else. That *is* blind ideology. And that is what Conservatives mean when they say that "ideology" is inherently destructive (and leftist).

The irony is that the type of open immigration Brook advocates would destroy America and Europe; the two areas on the planet even remotely capable of establishing the "individualist utopia" he envisions.

Yaron Says Immigration Doesn't Increase Crime

Neil Parille's picture

This is the most wanted list from Minneapolis (Hennepin County) Minnesota.

Yaron Brook is a fool.

Yaron Brook The Fool

Neil Parille's picture

If anyone can understand his views on immigration, you are more rational than me.

To the best I can understand he supports open immigration of anyone, eventually, including Muslims.


Doug Bandler The Second's picture

If it wasn't for Jihad, there would be no concern, but because there is, it comes down to self-preservation and the right to self-defense.

But Jihad is central to Islam. There is *no* Islam without Jihad. Islam is a perpetual solicitation to commit war. There can never be a peace between the Islamic world and the infidel. The only way for peace is for Islam to change internally and cease being truly Islamic. I can't imagine that happening in any timeframe less than centuries.

So if you truly value self-defense then that means recognizing Islam as the mortal enemy of the European world (and the entirety of anti-Muslim humanity) and Muslims as the transportation medium of that disease. Neither can be allowed in a society that avows to love liberty. The way you stated things is too soft; the softest I've seen from you come to think of it.

That is open to anyone, no matter what colour they are, to fight for, achieve, and then defend.

When I look at the world, the freest places are those with high IQ people. The hellholes are full of low IQ people. With an average IQ in the low and mid 90s you get countries with some 1st world areas but 3rd world ghettos (that make the country in total an unpleasant place especially if you are not upper class) . Whether or not Randian style liberty can be transferred to all the races on earth remains to be seen. Hell, it remains to be seen if whites themselves will not totally abandon liberty for Leftism. I see no future timeline in which racial genetics does not become important.

It's Not Genetics

Neil Parille's picture


Charles Murray (of The Bell Curve Fame) said recently that within 3 years we'll know one way or another whether racial differences in intelligence have a genetic basis. (Actually he said w/in 3 years we will know they do.)

If group A has an average IQ of 100 and group B has an average IQ of 85 they will produce different cultures. You've got to be a pomowonker not to realize that.

The Brotherhood of Man

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Without a shadow of a doubt, the future will consist of whites and blacks living, working, playing, and loving together in perfect harmony. They will ruthlessly exploit each other's strengths and weaknesses, interacting and meshing in pure peace and cooperation. So too men and women, straights and gays, young and old, artists and engineers, etc. And all will uphold and promote liberal philosophy and politics with ease.

So too with Neanderthals, if they get revived, and Martians, if they get discovered. Once an intelligent species is taught reason, individualism, and freedom, virtually all social problems are close to instantly resolved. That's not pollyanna -- that's reality.

It's not genetics

Lindsay Perigo's picture

It's indoctrination.

There are civilised blacks and uncivilised whites. Lotsa the latter within OrgOism, lauding headbanging and all the rest of multiculturalism. White OrgOists are bigger enemies than civilised blacks like Leontyne Price. How can these "alt-right" types not see that? I'm now all for apartheid: one side based on brains and meritocracy, quarantining all trash—the other, the trash, consisting significantly, inevitably, of Muslims.


Lindsay Perigo's picture

Islam can be banned because

Richard Wiig's picture

Islam can be banned because we are at war. If it wasn't for Jihad, there would be no concern, but because there is, it comes down to self-preservation and the right to self-defence.

"I would say that if liberty is to have a future, it will not be the race blind"

All that is needed is people who value liberty who are capable of seeing that it is, in Rands definition, a value to be achieved and then defended. That is open to anyone, no matter what colour they are, to fight for, achieve, and then defend.

It is a selfish thing, but so many Libertarians, I think, approach it altruistically.

I know, Kryel, but I struggle

Richard Wiig's picture

I know, Kryel, but I struggle with this idea that genetics has something to do with culture and morality. I could see a potential link between intelligence and genetics, but culture and morality doesn't wash with me. It is the realm of ideas, not genes. And how much intelligence is actually needed to understand the moral idea that it is wrong to mug or rape someone? Not much I don't think.


Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Richard -- I was talking about whites as a group -- not individual whites. Not you. Everyone is different. Different whites have different individual characteristics, both good and bad and neutral. I'm a radical Individualist. I'm fully aware that each person is different from every other person. That's how I always judge and treat them.

Islam first , racial hereditarianism later

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

If you want the minarchist night watchman state then you can not allow Islam within your borders. Islam can not be conceived of as just a religion or ideological phenomenon. It is many things simultaneously, all of them bad. It is a political ideology, a totalitarian legal system, a tactical war movement, a land grab for despotic elites, a Machiavellian subversive psy-ops campaign, a degenerate sexual cult that perpetuates systematic pedophilia, and all of this conducted by a dangerous and culturally alien 5th column (that today unbelievably is considered a "victim group" by the left because they are not white and not Christian). Islam needs to be banned from Western Nations and anyone with connections to Islamic culture *even if they are not Muslim* needs to be prohibited from entry. The policy should be "Separationism"; ie total separation from Islam and its peoples (combined with quarantining Muslims inside their historic lands).

If the Objectivist movement understood that and advocated that even with all the other blank slate bullshit they believe in, I would feel that the movement was fundamentally valuable and had merit (and maybe a future). But O'ism is in denial of Islamo-realism and openly argues for the opposite set of policies thinking that devastating war against a few countries while allowing Islam itself to exist within the West is the solution (the Rear Admiral Yawon Bwook war strategy).

Racial hereditarianism and how it affects liberty politics is a much harder subject. I think banning Islam can be legitimately argued under Rand's paradigm. But arguing for racial or ethno-nationalist based demographics is much harder (and is probably outside the parameters of Rand's thought no matter how skillfully stretched with upgraded knowledge).

Personally I do think that certain races can be considered inherently dangerous and treated the same way as a dangerous ideological phenomenon like Islam (Africans for certain). But I haven't worked out how and I doubt I ever will. I am not a philosopher. But if I had to bet on the future, I would say that if liberty is to have a future, it will not be the race blind ("race doesn't matter all that matters is individuals, bla, bla, bla,") individualism you see with libertarians and Objectivists today. Genetics *will* eventually be factored into the liberty equation. But I also feel that this will occur with time as it becomes both observationally and biologically understood that multi-racial societies are unsustainable.

I know that's a dark position to hold but that's where I'm at. And as I see fewer and fewer whites relative to blacks, browns and beiges, I become more convinced American multi-racialism is doomed.

I don't evade it, Kyrel. I'm

Richard Wiig's picture

I don't evade it, Kyrel. I'm more immoral, criminal, and animalistic than East Asians and Jews. How could I not be? I'm white.

No-One Wants to Hear It

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

As Doug bravely notes two comments above, there's a powerful argument to be made, based on current evidence, that blacks, Hispanics, and Arabs are naturally, significantly more immoral, criminal, and animalistic than whites. Also that whites are naturally, significantly more immoral, criminal, and animalistic than east Asians and Jews. But these hypotheses wildy violate almost-universal notions of democracy, equality, and egalitarianism. So evasion and fraud on these pivotal issues are rife.

Christianity vs Islam

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

This is a good video (only 14 min) on the differences b/w Islam and Christianity using the Seven Deadly Sins of Christianity vs The Seven Sins that doom a person to Hell of Islam. You see that Christianity's sins are borrowed from Greek philosophy, namely the Stoics and that they all can be expressions of a desire to improve moral character (there is alot of that in Christianity). But when you look at Islam's sins you see that they are designed as control over people and the defense of Islam as such. Also, the speaker makes a great point at the end that Islam is inherently *more collectivist* than Christianity because it has an in-group / out-group dichotomy built right into its core. There is a dual morality in Islam that there is not in Christianity. Form Muslims, non-Muslims are owed no moral concern.

And yet Objectivists think that all religions are equally as "epistemologically flawed" and that Muslims should be allowed in the country if they are not "Islamists". The non-Objectivist world is capable of making solid arguments that O'ists with their Randian epistemology can't. Depressing.

Not just Islam

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

Yes but an important point is that even without Islam, Middle Eastern and North African and Black African immigrants would be dangerous anyway. They are lower IQ and higher crime prone; much higher. The estimates of rapists as percentages of total population in African nations is very high. There would be problems with these people even without Islam. With Islam this population becomes nightmarish.

Look at the destruction that blacks and Mestizos have done to America without Islam. You can blame welfare statism all you want but the reality is that even with the same crappy welfare state system, if America were an all white country it would be a utopia compared to what it is today.

Black and brown people are dangerous because of the culture they bring with them which is related to their group biology. Equatorial region people are a problem everywhere. It goes beyond just Islam.


Richard Wiig's picture

Here's an article about the link between Islam and crime.

The recent import to Germany

Richard Wiig's picture

The recent import to Germany who yesterday attacked passengers on a train with an axe.

Absolutely Islam

Lindsay Perigo's picture

His uncle just testified he got "radicalised"—i.e., persuaded to take Islam seriously—a couple of weeks ago.

The French must go for vigilante-ism, since their govt has enabled the Islamofilth. Torch their ghettos and drive them right back to Africa. Retaliatory force against those who have initiated it, in the context of war declared by them.


Neil Parille's picture

I don't know the details, but it's important not to downplay the crime that is committed by Muslims. The are 50% of the prison population of France.

This is something Objectivists such as Brook don't talk about either. They want you to think the only problem is terrorism, which will go away when we nuke Iran and Saudi Arabia.


Richard Wiig's picture

The Tunisian's very attack was an act of worship. So, that on the surface he appeared to be a nominal muslim is really pretty meaningless. He redeemed himself through martyrdom and found his place in paradise.


Neil Parille's picture

You made a good point. The Tunisian driver was a low level criminal and apparently a nominal Muslim. This act was probably the culmination of his pathetic life. Brook wants to turn Islamic crime into jihad to support his nuke Iran and Saudi Arabia.

Looks like the official

Neil Parille's picture

Looks like the official channel of the sheriffs department.

My old friend Laurence Auster commented that everything has to be cute and hip today.

Support your local police, Orlando ...

Mark Hunter's picture

Over-the-top disgusting.
Orange County Sheriff’s Office participates in the Keep Dancing Orlando challenge
Tell me it’s a hoax, please.

Or simply accused of not

Richard Wiig's picture

Or simply accused of not being Objectivists. Their lack of objectivity is surely not the fault of Objectivism, the philosophy, but of their own lack of concern for it.

"This is where Objectivists can readily be accused of being blank slate naive utopian idealists"

Brook is truly ignorant

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

He also claims that Hispanics vote Democratic because the Republicans are (allegedly) anti-immigration.

This is an easily researchable subject. There is so much data out there showing that Hispanics vote Leftist because they are Leftist. Yet Objectivists from Biddle to Binsawnger to Brook all make this idiotic and easily falsifiable claim.

It's that the French, being leftists & multiculturalists, aren't willing to "convert" Muslims.

This is where Objectivists can readily be accused of being blank slate naive utopian idealists (just like many Classical Liberals) that have no understanding of human nature. Brook's claim is also the leftist claim: that Muslims can be assimilated and turned away from Islam; that exposing them to either left-liberal egalitarianism or right-liberal individualism will convert them away from Islam and Jihad. There is so much ignorance in that that it makes my brain hurt. And both Leftists and Objectivists hold to the same fundamental idea: Muslims can be won over by some variant of liberalism.

And that is my biggest problem with the Objectivist movement. Their refusal to see that Islam is a thought system incompatible with "the non-initiation of physical force or the THREAT of force" and that Muslims are incubators of this virulent thought disease known as Islam. The solution is EXCLUSION of all Muslims from Western nations. Individualism does not apply to them. The Objectivist view that it does and that "better Muslims" should have the right to be here is suicidal. That alone is enough to turn off most people that would be interested in limited government liberty. And that one piece of advocacy is enough to ensure Objectivism will never "capture any culture".

Brook: Invade the world, invite the world, convert the world

Neil Parille's picture

Brook said early on in the broadcast that the problem with Jihadists is not genetic or even their upbringing. It's that the French, being leftists & multiculturalists, aren't willing to "convert" Muslims.

Brook: I'm not a hypocrite

Neil Parille's picture

At around 1:07, Brook says it's not hypocritcal for him to suppport open immigration for every country except Israel. They are at war, etc. But they aren't at war with Christian Ehtiopians.

He also claims that Hispanics vote Democratic because the Republicans are (allegedly) anti-immigration. In fact, Hispanics are left of center on most issues.

Water off a ducks back, Linz.

Richard Wiig's picture

Water off a ducks back, Linz. I fully understand your anger.

Christianity is better than Islam

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

Shifting the focus to "Christianity is just as bad.... blah, blah" is the opposite of defending against Islam. It serves to intellectually disarm people and aid the advancing Jihadists.

Very important point. The "Christianity is just as bad" argument that is so popular with atheists in general and O'ists is particular is a *terrible* argument. I recall Binswanger making it by using quotes from the Old Testament and replacing the word "God" with the word "Allah". Oh how clever you are Binny!

Its a bad argument that should be dropped. The European people built the greatest civilization in history under the influence of Christianity. Christianity no matter how flawed served as the transmission belt for morality and virtue which no culture can survive without, as we are now witnessing. Islam is a vile religion even on religion's terms. It offers *nothing* of virtue and is totally irredeemable.

Richard has shown the kind of anti-Islam yet pro-liberty viewpoint that I wish was the standard for the O'ist movement. If the entire movement thought that Muslim immigration should end, Muslims should be out-migrated, the Mosques should be monitored or closed down, and the Left's alliance with Islam recognized as the evil that it is.. If that were what Objectivists were pushing in the media, they would make Conservatives look like pussies. And further, the movement would probably appeal more to the younger generation that is rejecting Leftism for the racial nationalism and Christian Traditionalism of the alt-right. Objectivism would show that it had balls which it currently does not posses.

Obamuslim Islamifies Americastan

Lindsay Perigo's picture

In my inbox today, writer unknown—Linz:

ALL Of A SUDDEN.........Seven Short Years Have Passed!

Before Obama there was virtually no outlandish presence of Islam in America.

All of a sudden, Islam is taught in schools. Christianity and the bible are banned in schools.

All of a sudden we must allow prayer rugs everywhere and allow for Islamic prayer in schools, airports and businesses.

All of a sudden we must stop serving pork in prisons.

All of a sudden we are inundated with law suits by Muslims who are offended by American culture.

All of a sudden we must allow burkas to be worn everywhere even though you have no idea who or what is covered up under

All of a sudden Muslims are suing employers and refusing to do their jobs if they personally deem it conflicts with Sharia Law.

All of a sudden the Attorney General of the United States vows to prosecute anyone who engages in "anti-Muslim speech".

All of a sudden, Jihadists who engage in terrorism and openly admit they acted in the name of Islam and ISIS, are emphatically declared they are NOT Islamic by our leaders and/or their actions are determined NOT to be terrorism, but other nebulous terms like 'workplace violence."

All of a sudden, it becomes Policy that Secular Middle East dictators that were benign or friendly to the West, must be replaced by Islamists and the Muslim Brotherhood.

All of a sudden our troops are withdrawn from Iraq and the middle east, giving rise to ISIS.

All of a sudden, America has reduced its nuclear stockpiles to 1950 levels, as Obama's stated goal of a nuke-free America by the time he leaves office continues uninterrupted.

All of a sudden, a deal with Iran must be made at any cost, with a pathway to nuclear weapons and HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars handed over to fund their programs.

All of a sudden America APOLOGIZES to Muslim states and sponsors of terror worldwide for acts of aggression, war and sabotage THEY perpetrate against our soldiers.

All of a sudden, the American Navy is diminished to 1917 Pre-World War I levels of only 300 ships. The Army is at pre-1940 levels. The Air Force scraps 500 planes and planned to retire the use of the A-10 Thunderbolt close air support fighter. A further draw down of another 40,000 military personnel is in progress.

All of a sudden half of our aircraft carriers are recalled for maintenance by Obama rendering the Atlantic unguarded, NONE are in the Middle East.

All of a sudden Obama has to empty Guantanamo Bay of captured Jihadists and let them loose in Jihad-friendly Islamic states. He demands to close the facility.

All of a sudden America will negotiate with terrorists and trade FIVE Taliban commanders for a deserter and Jihad sympathizer.

All of a sudden there is no money for American poor, disabled veterans, jobless Americans, hungry Americans, or displaced Americans but there is endless money for Obama's "Syrian refugee" resettlement programs.

All of sudden there is an ammunition shortage in the USA.

All of a sudden, the most important thing for Obama to do after a mass shooting by two Jihadists, is disarm American Citizens.

All of a sudden, the President of the United States cannot attend the Christian Funerals of a Supreme Court Justice and a former First Lady because of previous (seemingly unimportant) commitments.

All of a sudden, I âm sick to my stomach. I âm not sure the majority of Americans recognize the seriousness of the situation and how much progress has been made by Islam these last 7 years, a very brief time compared to a 78 year lifetime!


Lindsay Perigo's picture

Please forgive my ill-temper. I'm sure you can imagine the mood I was in, with Nice having just happened, the coup in Turkey failing ... and all that garbage coming from the mouth of Obamuslim.

I didn't defend Christianity

Richard Wiig's picture

I didn't defend Christianity as such, but called out a false claim against it. I'd do the same for Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam, or the local Macrame club, or any individual who is being unjustly maligned. What got my goat mainly though is the relativism that is raised in the face of the Islamic menace. Shifting the focus to "Christianity is just as bad.... blah, blah" is the opposite of defending against Islam. It serves to intellectually disarm people and aid the advancing Jihadists.

Here's a post of mine from

Richard Wiig's picture

Here's a post of mine from 2007, Linz:

Bosch Fawstin - Too Funny

Neil Parille's picture

Bosch Fawstin ‏@BoschFawstin 12m12 minutes ago

French Interior Minister, in saying there's no link between Nice attack & "Radical Islam", he's saying there's no link between him & reality


But saying it's unonnected with immigration shows a link with reality?

Are We Doomed?

Neil Parille's picture

It sure sounds like it (S. Mollyneux):

Learning To Live With Terrorism

Neil Parille's picture


The French Prime Minister has now come out and said the French will just have to "learn to live with terrorism." The squalid evil of such an injunction defies description.

Manuel Valls = Filth.


I hate to say it, but I think it's the truth. France is ten percent Muslim. I'm surprised more events like this don't happen. Short of "outmigrating" these people, I think the French ought to get used to it.


Lindsay Perigo's picture

It's not a holiday, it's permanent exile. The cost is worth it. All the better if Islamofilth rushes for the windfall.

And I don't already know your solution (I certainly agree with the one you just outlined). What I remember is your rush to defend Goblianity—vicious, primitive barbarism in its own right when politically dominant—against comparisons with Islamogoblinism.

All Goblinism is garbage. The Islamo version just happens to be, far and away, the most threatening right now. But nothing less than the triumph of reason will, ultimately, save us from any of it. To enable reason to triumph, we must find a way to secularise the sacred and make it stick. Aesthetics has a lot to do with this ... meaning we can't do it with headbanging caterwauling or fry-quacking. Professed opponents of Islamogoblinism and other such primitivism can't make a case while they support headbanging and are oblivious to fry-quacking.

Oh dear, full circle, and no one will get it.

It was just my sense of

Richard Wiig's picture

It was just my sense of humour, Linz. If you want to make a quick buck, what better than to revert and collect 50 grand or so for a holiday. But anyway, if you think back, I've been the one most on about Islam before anyone else here was. I've taken a lot of flack for it when I first started banging on about it. I know you have a lot on your plate, but you already know my solution. Kick the scum out. Stop Islamic immigration. Monitor the mosques and close down any mosque that has even a hint of jihad being taught. Bulldoze them even. Those few things among a host of other things that should be Islam unfriendly and defensive of Western Civilisation.

Weasel-word Wiig

Lindsay Perigo's picture

That would be a better reason to convert to Islam than Allah.

What is your point, exactly?

And what is your solution?

What a real American President sounds like

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Compare this to The Anti-American President, Obamuslim-Filth:

BTW, this is five years into Reagan's Alzheimer's, according to O'Lielly-Filth. The actual diagnosis of early stage Alzheimer's was made 8 years later, in 1994. Why am I the only one to get incensed by this??!!

You've always been right on maggots

gregster's picture

I agree as to their extermination. But kick them out first.

It's a no-brainer.

Does one want to live, or does one wish to die?

We've been saying this for years. Some of us.

Add these to the Phalanx of Filth

Lindsay Perigo's picture

The French Prime Minister has now come out and said the French will just have to "learn to live with terrorism." The squalid evil of such an injunction defies description.

Manuel Valls = Filth.

Fox News piously refrains from playing video of the gruesome carnage in Nice, while replaying over and over the recent footage of white cops shooting blacks, in circumstances that are not yet clear.

Whoever is responsible for that = Filth.

Bill O'Lielly gets a phone call on air from Crooked Hillary and licks her faeces-encrusted anus that can't even excrete straight.

Bill O'Leilly = Filth.

Turkish patriots loyal to the secularist vision of Ataturk try to mount a coup to overthrow the wannabe theocracy of Erdogan. Obamuslim issues a statement opposing the attempted coup and supporting Erdogan.

Erdogan = Filth.

Obamuslim = Filth. But we already knew that.

Totalifilth (Filth, mainly moronnial, for Totalitarianism) is all over Faecesbook and Twit-Witter, promoting appeasement of Islamofilth in the wake of Nice.

Totalifilth is just that: Totally Filth.

That would be a better reason

Richard Wiig's picture

That would be a better reason to convert to Islam than Allah.

Pay them to leave

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

We'll pay for it even though they should. Just get them out of here

I believe William Lind (Grant can correct me on this) has argued that the US government should pay Muslims to leave by offering anywhere from 50k-100k to go; getting the larger number if they leave sooner. The Muslim would then have to sign a document that they may never return. He estimates that even if we had to spend 500 billion or more it would be money well spent.

If Trump proposed that policy I can just imagine what ARIans and OrgOists would accuse him of.

Deport every Muslim

Lindsay Perigo's picture

That has to be every civilised person's default position. Let these adherents to the stinking, stupid, savage superstition that is Islam go to the Muslim country of their choice. We'll pay for it even though they should. Just get them out of here. Let them enjoy their Sharia among themselves.

Not One Muslim!

Death to Islam!

Lone Jihadis

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Neil -- Overthrowing the dictatorships in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, etc., and replacing them with liberal states, would almost certainly have a profound impact upon the world. Jihad and sharia would go into radical decline worldwide -- including "lone wolf" jihadi attacks like in Nice. Gov'ts are powerful world actors. They encourage, direct, and fund almost everyone, for good or ill.

If only we had "flattened" Iran and Saudi Arabia . . . .

Neil Parille's picture

this wouldn't have happened. I mean, you need to have some Mullah directing you to come up with the idea of running people over with a truck.

Unknown People Doing Things for Unknown Reasons

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

American t'v' news reporters were hilarious on today's Nice, France Massacre story, as usual. They discussed it endlessly with not one mention of the word "Islam" or "Muslims". Who did this monstrosity and why? Every single viewer was probably thinking Muslims did this for the purpose of promoting Islam. But no-one said a single word about. Just some vague comments near the end of the reports that the French police thought it was probably an act of "terrorism" by "terrorists". I turned off my t'v' in disgust.


Grant Jones's picture

"Deport every Moslem who believes in shariah." Which is to say, deport every Moslem.

KASS Newt!

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Finally, tonight on Hannity, after the events in Nice, Gingrich let rip. Deport all believers in Shariah from the US. Don't let any believers in Sharia in. Declare war. Monitor the mosques and close them when in doubt. Islamofilth websites should be a felony, as should visiting them. It's war, and should be treated like one. Obamislam will say the problem is too many trucks. Etc., etc. KASS!!

Death to Islam!

A Thought Expiriment

Neil Parille's picture

Putting aside the issues of war and the draft, the fact is that the anglo-saxon countries of NZ, Austrialia, USA, Rhodesia, South Africa and Canada joined with the Allies in two world wars to fight the Huns.

Would a multicultural England, USA, etc. for which Yaron Brook and Harry Binswanger pine for fight for Western Civilization against the commies or the Nazis?

Would a Muslim Germany cheer Ronald Reagan as he proclaimed, "Mr. Gorbachev tear down that wall"

Did Rush "Red Pill" on Rhodesia?

Neil Parille's picture

Not exactly, but if you read between the lines.

As if Hillary and Obama aren't predecessors

Richard Wiig's picture

Unite the civilised world.

But Trump is a Fascist

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

What Skousen points out is all happening under a Leftist President. It will continue to happen under Hillary. Would it happen under Trump?

But the Objectivist movement has informed us that Trump is a strong man predecessor to Hitler and that we should vote for Hillary to stop the march of Fascism on the right. And also so Trump-Hitler won't be associated with capitalism...

Total reality detachment.


Neil Parille's picture

Skousen's comments are quite interesting. I hadn't looked at it that way before.

This guy should have been locked up long ago. In an ideal world he would have been deported.

Someone coined the phrase recently, "Muslim Privilege" and that appears to be what has happened. Certanly the media has become ever more pro-Islamic following each attacks and perhaps public opinion is changing.

Obafilth ...

Lindsay Perigo's picture

... is upping the level and pace of Syrian refugee acceptance, just to rub everyone's noses in it.

Again I say, Americastan, here we come.

"Fundamental transformation of America" is what Obafilth pledged. Mission accomplished.

An ex-FBI Assistant-Director told Judge Jeanine today there's a "fifth column" in Washington, in the media and on campuses. She didn't pick up on it.

Yet another FBI-grown terrorist?

Mark Hunter's picture

From Joel Skousen’s latest World Affairs Brief (paragraphing added):

The mass shooting at the gay night club in Orlando is a textbook case of an unstable Muslim man influenced by federal agent provocateurs to engage in an act of terror.

When you read about Omar Mateen’s troubled background and eagerness to cozy up to law enforcement, you can see how he would be a prime candidate for influence and control. There is also no way he could have come out of two law enforcement background checks and a detailed 10 month FBI investigation completely exonerated unless he was being protected from discovery.

There are three major agendas that are being exploited in a grand scale based on this mass shooting: 1) advancement in the gun control agenda and 2) turning gays and their assorted variations into a protected class, free from criticism and/or legislative action that protects normal persons from unwanted business or personal dealings with gays, including the privacy of restrooms. And, 3) the protection of Muslims as a religious class that, despite years of preaching jihad and intolerance against Christians and Jews, has become sacrosanct.


There’s a weak point in the second paragraph: “no way” – except for total ineptness.

reply to Kyle

Mark Hunter's picture

No Kyle, right now we desperately need an immigration moratorium. Twenty years later we can return to the Immigration Act of 1924, with “northwestern Europe” replaced by “northwestern Europe and white,” because of the subsequent non-white immigration into Europe.

Good Guys Only

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

What issue could be easier to solve than immigration? Let the good people in, and keep the bad people out. If a would-be immigrant enhances the country, he gets in; if he degrades it, he's kept out. Problem solved.

re non-white Objectivists

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

Most Indian Objectivists I've encountered are fanatical no borders "for America" types.

Asians and Hispanics too. Basically if a non-white becomes an Objectivist they immediately latch on to open immigration and America as a proposition nation; ie they can not see the ethnic nature of America's founding. But then sadly neither can white Objectivists. And non-white Objectivists harbor the same hatred of white conservatives that white leftists do.

Some of the worst personalities in the O'ist movement I've seen are by non-whites or by whites that have married non-whites; ie Diana Hsieh.


Grant Jones's picture

I don't know anything concrete on ARI offshore funding. I've heard second and third hand about foreign money coming in from India and from Indian expats in the USA. Most Indian Objectivists I've encountered are fanatical no borders "for America" types. I don't know much, but what I do know fits the pattern.

P.S. I'm not at liberty to name my sources. But, this is a topic that is worth looking into.

Question for Grant Jones

Mark Hunter's picture

You wrote: “ARI and Hillary Clinton have the same overriding objective: to keep those offshore checks coming in.”

Hillary gets money from Saudi Arabia and over a dozen other foreign countries.

The only money I’ve heard of ARI getting from overseas has been from a rich Dane, who has funded an ARI initiative in Denmark.

There might be other offshore donors. Someone is paying for Yaron Brook’s junkets to Japan, China, Hong Kong, England and all over continental Europe.

What do you know?

Orlando Massacre

Neil Parille's picture

The coverage of this (particularly by CNN and NYT) is just disgraceful. There is zero evidence that this was done out of "homophobia." And if it was, it had nothing to do white, Christian "homophobia."

We now know that the guy was considering attacking Disney. If he though he could kill 50 people at Disney World is there any doubt he would have picked that as his target?

ARI and Hillary Clinton

Grant Jones's picture

ARI and Hillary Clinton have the same overriding objective: to keep those offshore checks coming in.

Ha.. Grant

gregster's picture

When they (the maggot Muslims) have openly declared war, and made it plain by endless attacks--then you kick the cunts out. It's simple. And you export their state-tit-sucking residents as well, for the sake of citizens. We, you and I, won't fall for these ape men antics, ape men aware of the overwhelming political correctness of the west- as ARI does.

Peas in a Pod

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Great point, Doug! But psychologically, Muslims and Randroids are virtually the same. Maybe the ARIans are mentally and spiritually uncomfortable with driving out their fellow malicious, mindless, soulless, cultist destroyers.

A Tweet for Journo

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

Instead of having a surveillance state to watch Muslims, let's have a free society without Muslims.

The simplicity in that statement is too psychologically deep for OrgOists and Orthos to understand.

Elan Journo

Grant Jones's picture

There is only one appropriate response to Journo's latest bowel movement:

Journo, circa 1939

Lindsay Perigo's picture

"Notice how this view wipes out a crucial distinction, one that’s necessary for understanding the Nazi cause. While most Nazis are German, it is blatantly false that all Germans are Nazis. It should go without saying, though today it is necessary to say so, that countless Germans are law abiding, peaceful, productive Americans. Nazis, by contrast, are individuals who choose to join an ideological cause, a cause intent on the totalitarian imposition of Nazi law. What distinguishes the Nazis is not any inborn tribal identity, but the vicious political-ideological vision they strive to realize. It is this ideological factor that the tribalist view negates."

So open up the borders to all Germans claiming to be peaceful?


Clearly it has eluded the ARI that we are at war with Islam, a war declared and vigorously pursued by Muslims. But we must still adopt as our default position that all adherents to "Slay the infidel wherever ye find him" are innocent till they show otherwise?

Useful idiots.

"Jihadism" - that's the problem

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

This is a problem that Auster addressed on numerous occasions and his discussion of it was one of the best I've seen. When you view "Jihad" as an "extreme" version of Islam instead of CENTRAL to Islam, you see that using a term like "Jihad cause" is nonsense. Jihad is the loyal implementation of Islam which is carried out by Muslims who are emboldened when they have large numbers. Which is why it is the Muslims AS A GROUP which are the problem. Not Jihad. But Journo sees none of this.

IMO, his understanding of Islam is where mine was back in 2005. But after I started reading about Islamic doctrine and history I was already moving towards the idea that Islam and Muslim populations were the problem. Then I discovered Auster and the alt / Trad Right and I saw true wisdom in this area. But Journo has made the view that "Jihadism" or "Extremist Islam" or "Totalitarian Islam" central to his foreign policy advocacy. In fact, ARI has made this error. And that is why they are producing pure garbage. Worse actually. By pushing open immigration of Muslims they are on the side of the Left. They are even labeling any who disagree with them as "racist". OrgOism has become libertarian-Leftists, which is exactly the vibe they give off.

I'm starting to hate them again.

Catholicism Swalloed By The Left

Neil Parille's picture

The Bishop one country over from Orlando blames the Catholic Church for the Orlando shooting. No wonder why these clowns can't stand up for Christianity:

Journo Is Clueless

Neil Parille's picture

Take this:


Notice how this view wipes out a crucial distinction, one that’s necessary for understanding the jihadist cause. While all jihadists are followers of Islam, it is blatantly false that all Muslims are jihadists. It should go without saying, though today it is necessary to say so, that countless Muslims are law abiding, peaceful, productive Americans. Jihadists, by contrast, are individuals who choose to join an ideological cause, a cause intent on the totalitarian imposition of Islamic religious law. What distinguishes the jihadists is not any inborn tribal identity, but the vicious political-ideological vision they strive to realize. It is this ideological factor that the tribalist view negates.

This isn't particularly clear. Apparently Journo believes that the Orlando shooter or the San Bernadino shooters could just have well wound up as pacifist Quakers? It's "tribalistt" to think that children might follow what their parents think?

If someone is on friendly terms with Journo, perhaps he or she would invite him here to discuss his views, in particular that the USA, the West, and Israel have nothing to fear from open immigration of hundreds of millions of law abiding Muslims.

The Zombie Institute

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

No-one is more tribalist than the Borg members of ARI.

Painful To Read

Neil Parille's picture

Yes. Journo isn't stupid. I'm sure he knows the argument that second and third generation Muslims tend to be worse than the first. He must know that many of the Jihadis in the west were born here, but it doesn't matter. If you think that the bad aspects of Islam will reassert itself then I guess you are a "tribalist."

Ayn Randroid Institute essay

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Hilariously incompetent essay. If Trump condemns "radical Islam" by name, he probably means "radical Islam." Trump seems to be attacking the Muslims' beliefs, not their race, as is proper. Journo's article was dishonest, foolish, and far-fetched. Notice how these pseudo-Objectivist cyborgs NEVER allow people to comment. They'd be destroyed intellectually and spiritually.

Painful to read

Doug Bandler The Second's picture

It really is. Its wrong on everything. OrgOists have no understanding of what determines culture. And they are psychologically incapable of understanding that groups have properties and that the individual Muslim is irrelevant, it is the group that matters. And Muslims as a GROUP are incubators for never ending belligerence and violence and war (which is why Muslim societies always produce dictators and strong men).

We are seeing the blankslate component of Objectivism swallow the whole movement. This is why I rarely read anything from OrgOist circles. I know what they are going to say beforehand. I can also understand why Larry Auster and many old style Conservatives hate Objectivists (and libertarians). I see now that the positions that they hold are so asinine and destructive that they are indeed hate worthy.

The ARI Calls For Open Immigration Of Muslims

Neil Parille's picture

This is from today's blog of the ARI. It is by foreign policy guru Elan Journo. Of course, I'm not positive that it represents the view of the ARI, but I assume it was cleared by "Chief Content Officer" Onkar Ghate.

Note: no exceptions on the number of Muslims. So it looks like the ARI supports turning Europe and ISrael Islamic:


You can see that in the depressingly popular “solution” of enacting a sweeping ban on Muslim immigration. Obviously, a rational immigration policy must bar entry to individuals seeking to violate our rights (thus barring anyone with ties to or membership in Islamist groups and organizations), while allowing entry to individuals seeking to live and work peacefully. The proposed ban, however, starts with the opposite, tribalist premise. Outsiders: bad. Maybe some will turn out to be OK, but don’t count on it.


Also, it is pure leftism. Donald Trump is a tribalist and a racist.


But it turns out that the killer in Orlando was born — like Trump himself — in New York. Revealingly, the blame is put on the fact that the killer’s parents were Afghan immigrants: “The bottom line is that the only reason the killer was in America in the first place was because we allowed his family to come here.” That applies equally to generations of Americans, the vast majority of whom were law abiding citizens. So for Trump, the blame falls on the killer’s outsider bloodline. His parents came from a faraway land, so he is forever an outsider; his beliefs and chosen actions are irrelevant. On this view, the tag “radical Islam” turns out to be vacuous: far from designating a substantive conception of the jihadist cause, in fact it serves as a shorthand for tribalist bigotry against outsiders (which manifests as outright racism when Trump applies it to Hispanics).



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.