who is chatting on SOLO ChatThe Free RadicalPopular contentWho's onlineThere are currently 1 user and 22 guests online.
Online usersPollWhat should the government do about ailing financial institutions? Nothing, except to back off and get out—as any Objectivist knows, intervention is treating the disease with the disease 85% Intervene judiciously—enough to avert a catastrophe that is otherwise imminent 4% Intervene massively—as it's doing 2% Nationalize the whole economy and be done with it. Bring on the USSA! 2% Something else (specify) 7% Total votes: 55
|
SOLO-NZ Press Release: Dim Move By GovernmentSubmitted by Lance on Tue, 2008-06-17 03:35.
SOLO-NZ Press Release: Dim Move By Government “The announcement today by the government of their plan to “phase out” incandescent bulbs is yet one more little slice in the "death of a thousand cuts" of liberty” Says SOLO spokesman Lance Davey “Compact fluorescent bulbs, which are the intended replacement, are a neat little piece of emerging technology. They're cheaper to use for one thing, and the light emitted is not as unpleasant as the big industrial fluorescent tube lighting of yore. “But the government's plan to force people to utilise the new CFL bulbs is just misguided meddling. The CFL bulbs are not without some shortcomings that may leave consumers wishing they had a choice: CFL bulbs can take anywhere from 30 seconds to 3 minutes to “warm up” to full brightness and the colour cast may be different from when it is turned on - compared to the 0.1 seconds it takes for an incandescent. CFL bulbs contain small amounts of mercury. In countries where CFL bulbs are mandatory, a mandatory recycling scheme was also soon implemented with the cost being added into the purchase price of each bulb. Making the already expensive bulbs even more costly. CFL bulbs actually degrade in light quality over time. In a recent study conducted with “Energy Star” certified bulbs, one quarter of tested CFLs no longer met their rated output after 40% of their rated service life. So even though CFL bulbs “last” longer, you may want to replace them sooner. Some people can have very negative reactions to CFL lighting, causing migraines, dizziness and nausea. “CFL bulbs are otherwise great, and I hope that manufacturers keep on tweaking and developing their product and get them on a par with incandescents (despite there being no incentive in the new product monopoly) – but the idea that in a few years time one would be forced to smuggle contraband light bulbs into the country, if they prefer them, is an absurdity.” Lance Davey ldavey@xtra.co.nz 045890932 SOLO-SOLOPassion.com
( categories: )
|
User loginFeatured BookNavigation |
Bizarre
doesn't come close in describing the negative economic effects of the carbon crusade.
This is setting itself up to be the greatest joke in history. Of course religion is the greater joke, but that will continue.
I must confess to not
I must confess to not having realised there were [no fewer than] two kinds of lightbulbs until last Sunday when I read this in the newspaper, let alone having heard of this "Compact fluorescent bulb" carryon.
It does seem a bit silly to me...as if one lightbulb makes any difference when compared with another..gosh, just bizarre
http://nzcapitalist.blogspot.com/
I'll
just stick with the good ole indecent bulbs me in my aims to maximise my 'carbon footprint.'
Prescriptions
I can just see people asking their doctors for prescriptions for the old incandecent bulbs. "They give me headaches!"
Perhaps we will see a massive epidemic of people with fluorescent-induced headache symptoms.
Don't laugh - New Zealanders needed a prescription to buy margarine back when butter was subsidised and margarine was essentially banned due to being a cheaper competitior.
It doesn't concern lightbulbs either
Regardless how good or bad you think the new ones are, a principle is involved here, the right to purchase any light-bulb one wants!
This doesn't concern halogen
This doesn't concern halogen bulbs does it? I'll still be able to buy those?