The Objectivist Comic Hero, Mr A, and no, it's not Yawon Bwook

HWH's picture
Submitted by HWH on Sun, 2008-06-22 08:57.

http://blogs.lubbockonline.com/slemmons/

Conservatism seems to be a difficult topic for comics to deal with,
especially for traditional superhero comics. Part of that could stem
from the medium's early liberalism (While Superman is considered a
conservative character nowadays, his early adventures usually had him
taking on wealthy corporate crooks and greedheads), but in general,
most comics writers just seem to have trouble tying characters to
political views. Even characters whose conservatism is considered
well-established often have fairly vague political beliefs -- how do we
know, for example, that Hawkman is a conservative? Is it because he's
in favor of lower taxes or opposes gay marriage? No, it's because he
always gets into big arguments with Green Arrow, who is a liberal.

But sometimes, a creator comes up with a compelling character
whose conservative political philosophy is not just specifically
stated, but is an intrinsic part of the character's personality. For
instance: Steve Ditko's Mr. A.

Ditko, of course, is the co-creator of Spider-Man, Dr. Strange,
the Creeper, Captain Atom, and dozens of other characters. But he's had
a bit of a snarky relationship with comics -- he hasn't given
interviews or made personal appearances since the '60s, and his general
dissatisfaction with the current state of the comics industry is pretty
well-known. Ditko is also a follower of author Ayn Rand's conservative
philosophy of Objectivism, and in 1967, he decided to create a hero embodying Objectivist principles.

The result, in the third issue of "witzend" magazine, was Mr. A.
Named for the Randian "A is A" philosophy of the "Law of Identity," Mr.
A was really reporter Rex Graine. He never really had an origin -- he
just went out in his all-white suit and fedora and his solid steel mask
and gloves, and fought crime. He leaves business cards that are half
white and half black to signify his belief that there is only good and
evil, with no moral gray space in the middle.

The typical Mr. A story focused on a character who convinces
himself that he can do a small number of illegal acts without
compromising his own inherent good nature. But those small crimes
eventually snowball into larger and more serious crimes. They often try
to justify their actions by blaming other people, the environment, or
society for their own actions. People who commit only small crimes may
only be delivered by Mr. A to the police for trial, but murderers are
often left in a position where they must rely on Mr. A to save them,
and he never lifts a finger to save the guilty, because they never
lifted a finger to save the innocent.

Of course, Mr. A is indeed impossibly merciless, but that's been
done plenty often before. Mr. A wasn't really written in order to be
realistic or to be a thrilling adventure tale -- its primary purpose is
to promote Objectivism. Does it do that job well? On the one hand,
there's not much way to doubt that Mr. A is as close as you're going to
get to an Ultimate Objectivist -- he never compromises or bends his
principles; he absolutely does not believe that evil is subjective;
he's a moral, intellectual and physical super-specimen, especially
compared to most other people; and he's a really, really preachy guy.

The big problem for Mr. A as a piece of Objectivist propaganda
is that the only people who think Mr. A is an appealing role model are
people who are already Objectivists. You wouldn't want to hang out with
a guy like Mr. A, getting all scowly and condemnatory if your favorite
football team got too many penalties. You wouldn't even want him to be
a cop, 'cause he's the type of guy who'd haul you off to jail for
jaywalking. You wouldn't want to hang out with Mr. A, and there
probably aren't too many folks who'd want to be him, either.

But "Mr. A" is still a series and a character that I feel a lot
of respect for. He's a well-realized character with conservative
beliefs that don't derive from whatever the latest shouting points are
on right-wing thug radio, or devolve into cartoonish parody. And
besides that, Ditko's artwork is fun to look at, too. Smiling

And of course, Mr. A is closely related to another Ditko
character, the Question, who got his start very close to the same time
as Mr. A. Originally a Charlton Comics character, the Question was
another vengeful Objectivist, though it's been a few decades since the
Question was portrayed that way. And Mr. A also has ties to Rorschach,
the uncompromisingly conservative vigilante who co-starred in Alan
Moore's "Watchmen" series in the mid-1980s.

(For more on Ditko and Mr. A, be sure to read Dial B for Blog's Mr. A series.)


( categories: )

Ditko...no less than a real world Henry Cameron it seems

HWH's picture

 

The invisible hand behind Spidey

Brilliant but eccentric, Spider-Man's forgotten right-wing co-creator surfaces in a new book

SARMISHTA SUBRAMANIAN | July 16, 2008 |

SARMISHTA SUBRAMANIAN

-->

In a movie season littered with brooding heroes like Batman and
Hellboy, the superhero who casts the largest shadow may be the one
who's not popping up at multiplexes. When Spider-Man burst on the page
in 1962, he revolutionized a comics scene littered with chiselled,
preternaturally confident men of action. Here, suddenly, was a bookworm
who didn't fit in at school, looked weedy in his spider suit, and who,
the moment he'd foiled his first criminals, was branded a public
menace. Spidey was the first of the troubled loner superheroes, and the
man to thank for him, people say, is Stan Lee. But behind every great
comic by Lee was a thankless artist toiling in the shadows, and behind
Spider-Man was Lee's brilliant and eccentric co-creator, Steve Ditko.

If
Ditko has been eclipsed in the historical record, monetarily, too, he
was shafted: paid a paltry page rate for work that would generate
millions for others. Outside comic-book fandom, where he's viewed as a
legend for works like Spider-Man and Dr. Strange, he's utterly unknown.
His pieces are rare on the lucrative art market. Now the first real
retrospective, the handsome Strange and Stranger: The World of Steve
Ditko (Fantagraphics Books) by a Toronto author, Blake Bell, pieces
together a portrait of the elusive genius.

The 80-year-old
Ditko isn't the easiest guy to memorialize. He doesn't give interviews.
As prickly as he is visionary, he refused to participate in this book,
which, he told Bell five years before its publication, was "a poison
sandwich." He has warred with collaborators and fans. It turns out one
reason it's hard to buy his art is that he hoards it all. (He has
denounced the comics-art world as a "thieves' market," says Bell, much
of the work withheld from creators, or stolen.) Greg Theakston, an
illustrator, talks in the book about visiting Ditko's studio in New
York and seeing him use as a cutting board a page with a "Comics Code"
stamp. A closer look showed it was an original Ditko page from the
'50s. Ditko had thousands of them socked away.

Ditko fell out with Stan Lee, too, although he wrested an
unprecedented level of creative control from him and, eventually,
credit. By Spider-Man issue No. 11, Dikto was drawing the strip, but
also handling most of the plotting and even the dialogue notes, to be
scripted by Lee. He got credit for that work, but 14 issues later. By
his last year on the strip, the two had stopped talking, Bell says.
Ditko would draw the strip with no indication to Lee of what he
intended. Spider-Man No. 35 introduces a new super-villain, Meteor Man.
By the next issue he's called the Looter.

The name brings up a
key source of Ditko's various wars. It's straight from the songbook of
Objectivism, the individualistic, hard-right ideology founded by Ayn
Rand. Capitalist, anti-collective themes emerged ever more stridently
in Ditko's work. In one page, printed in Bell's book, Peter Parker is
mobbed by hippies. "Another student protest! What are they after this
time?" he asks. In 1966 Ditko walked out on Marvel over what he said
were unpaid royalties and broken promises. He did most of his
subsequent work for smaller houses. To subsist, he inked pages,
unapologetic grunt work. His creative output has since included the
vigilante hero Mr. A, and a mountain of political diatribes in
essay/cartoon form.

But his legacy is undeniable. Visually,
Ditko was revolutionary. His world is haunted, evocative, its darkly
real cities peopled by gaunt, grotesque-looking people. Not for him the
sleek, cosmopolitan Gotham of Batman; Peter lives in Queens with an
Auntie May who looks as elderly as she's meant to be. Pre-Ditko, too,
superhero action had a staccato rhythm, says Bell. "It was all fury,
fist-on-fist power. Ditko's heroes moved. It was almost like a ballet —
they bent and they curved, they were pliable." Ditko was fascinated by
his heroes' inner lives. "To him, what the person does when he doesn't
have his mask or his superpowers is just as important," says Dave Sim,
the controversial Canadian author of the indie comic Cerebus. The very
idea of a complex moral and philosophical overlay in a comic was
Ditko's legacy, one acknowledged by artists like Frank Miller (Sin
City).

Ditko drew Spider-Man for 38 iconic issues. The artist
who took over, John Romita, couldn't mimic his style. The series' look
completely altered, as did the narrative. "His classmates embraced
him," says Bell. "Mary Jane Watson was pretty, and even Spider-Man was
looking like a muscled superhero. It changed from a revolutionary
series to just a well-written, well-drawn superhero book."

 

I admit that reason is a small and feeble flame, a flickering torch by stumblers carried in the starless night, -- blown and flared by passion's storm, -- and yet, it is the only light. Extinguish that, and nought remains.- - Robert Green Ingersoll

flatbed scanner


The Incredibles...a sign of things to come I hope

HWH's picture

 Here's an interesting excerpt from "News America" about animated movies and cartoons. No wonder I loved that movie as much

 

Interestingly, “Wall-E” does not stand alone. There seems to be a
recent shift in children’s movies these days. Gone are the films with
simple tales of morality. More and more animations now weave complex
themes into their plotlines.

“The Incredibles,” released in 2004, was a well-received Pixar
animation whose plot centered on a family of superheroes forced into
hiding their extraordinary identities. Government-sponsored superheroes
were then a thing of the past. Negative public opinion and numerous
lawsuits by human citizens drove all of the superheroes underground,
forbidden by the government to use their powers and confined to false,
human identities.

Mr. Incredible and other superheroes are shown to be extraordinary in a
world of human mediocrity, yet their powers are suppressed.

The Free Liberal, an online journal providing political and economic
commentary, described “The Incredibles” as a quintessential tale of
Objectivism.

The journal claims that the plot of the movie was a direct reflection
of the ideas of Ayn Rand, the author of iconic novels advocating
capitalism and the founder of Objectivism.

“[Ayn Rand] did lash out repeatedly against a world that celebrated
mediocrity over achievement, norms over exceptionalism,” writes The
Free Liberal.

Cosmo Landesman, who writes for The Sunday Times, agrees. “The
Incredibles,” he writes, is “the story of how the egalitarian drive in
modern America killed off the superhero. It’s a passionate and
politically incorrect plea for truth, justice and the Nietzschean way.”

 

I admit that reason is a small and feeble flame, a flickering torch by stumblers carried in the starless night, -- blown and flared by passion's storm, -- and yet, it is the only light. Extinguish that, and nought remains.- - Robert Green Ingersoll

projector 


Hilton ...

Lindsay Perigo's picture

Could this elephant ever be coaxed to leave the room? C'mon Leonard....for Galt's sake, please come clean on this now and admit you bollixed up ever so slightly old chap.

I suspect this may already have happened, discreetly. Leonard makes a point at the beginning of his podcasts of saying he won't be dispensing voting advice.

Speaking of podcasts, Hilton ... Eye


@Linz

HWH's picture

I knew I had the chance of a dying duck in a hailstorm, but had to try. It's a bloody shame about this estrangement though as I would have loved to interact with one or two of the worthier individuals there.

Could this elephant ever be coaxed to leave the room? C'mon Leonard....for Galt's sake, please come clean on this now and admit you bollixed up ever so slightly old chap.

I admit that reason is a small and feeble flame, a flickering torch by stumblers carried in the starless night, -- blown and flared by passion's storm, -- and yet, it is the only light. Extinguish that, and nought remains.- - Robert Green Ingersoll


Hahahahaha, Hilton!

Lindsay Perigo's picture

BTW Yaron, If you ever get to read this, what are your thoughts on this FATWA thing?

Nice try, Hilton, but you won't get a bite. They read SOLO but have to make out they don't. Anyway, they're non-profit and so couldn't endorse a fatwa telling folk how to vote.

Never doubt that they're doing Galt's work. A shame some of the old cloisters are still standing. They'll be there till the old guard dies off I suspect.


Mea Culpa

HWH's picture

No I didnt write this...Just copied and pasted thinking the source link would come through but it didnt.

As for the dig...it just popped into my head while writing the headline, and for the sake of my own mild amusement I could'nt resist.

No offence meant Yaron...sowwy.

BTW Yaron, If you ever get to read this, what are your thoughts on this FATWA thing?

 

I admit that reason is a small and feeble flame, a flickering torch by stumblers carried in the starless night, -- blown and flared by passion's storm, -- and yet, it is the only light. Extinguish that, and nought remains.- - Robert Green Ingersoll


Decent write up

Landon Erp's picture

I've been a huge Mr. A fan for years. There is one thing I think most critics tend to forget about Rex.

There are a number of parts to the story where his attitude towards innocents are on display. And the main problem involved is that most people approach this from an "original sin" point of view, that most people are guilty.

That's not how Mr. A sees things. He sees most people as being innocent (since it is possibly to be morally perfect under Objectivism). With this in mind, if a person actually is guilty, they're bad enough that they don't deserve mercy.

All in all I'm always happy to see Mr. A or anything Ditko posted. Glad to see this.

---Landon

Never mistake contempt for compassion, or power lust for ambition.

http://www.myspace.com/wickedlakes


Conservative? What the?

Peter Cresswell's picture

"Ditko is also a follower of author Ayn Rand's conservative
philosophy of Objectivism...
"

"Conservative"? Did you write this, Hilton? And what's with the dig at Yaron Brook?

You [?] say "You wouldn't want to hang out with
a guy like Mr. A... You wouldn't even want him to be
a cop, 'cause he's the type of guy who'd haul you off to jail for jaywalking. You wouldn't want to hang out with Mr. A, and there probably aren't too many folks who'd want to be him, either."

Sounds less like an Objectivist than he does a simpleton Javert -- which is how I felt about "Mr A" when I read one of these comics back in the eighties.


Stranger and Stranger

Jmaurone's picture

I had no idea you were a Ditko fan, Landon should be frothing over this Smiling

Anyway, here's the "stranger" part:a new book due in July called STRANGER AND STRANGER: THE WORLD OF STEVE DITKO by Blake Bell: 

http://www.amazon.com/Strange-Stranger-World-Steve-Ditko/dp/1560979216


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.