Mark,

This creep exposes himself on the (sub)Standard from time to time. I confess to occasionally visiting that swamp for similar reasons that Victorian Londoners amused themselves at Bedlam. My suggestion is to ignore him!

My email reply to nefarious_2000@hotmail.com

With friends like chris lineberry, aka eldo, aka elijah, and poor old perigo
helping you out in your blog you really don't need any enemies, do you!

Well at least I know who they are, being they're not scaredy-cats hiding behind nom de plumes like erstwhile Stasi agents for the Big Nanny Police State, Mr Evil.

Do you think you will be able to stop obsessing over the random choice of
name for this email address of mine, anytime soon?

Um, obsessing? Me? Whose stalking me through my email? I made my last post to that thread sometime yesterday afternoon and haven't been back.

You have a good day, now, ya hear, I've got work to do. (Ahem, I hope you're not sitting at home on a benefit stalking me with my own damned money?)

I can certainly empathise with your frustration, Mark....deceitful people deliberately misunderstanding and twisting what you say to give entirely the opposite impression...yes...such a bore.

I think all the 'normal' people understand your posts and will not be swayed by some soothsayers and communists.

http://nzcapitalist.blogspot.com/

Synopsis:

The thread mentioned in my first post below demonstrates why forum debate can be a waste of time. To summarise the thread:

I said, at least twice, " My argument is that the CCC has taken my rates money, and applied it towards ends I am philosophically, implacably opposed to, and have given no mandate for. I fail to see how this is anything other than theft. Further, there is only the single party which has a policy of taking the teeth from a Local Government sector that has grown such a voracious appetite for other people's money, and then mis-using same: Libertarianz."

The opposing argument seemed to boil down to, " Dave Henderson is motivated by one thing, and all the spin in the world will never change that. He is motivated by making money."

Because this rather missed the point, well, not rather, entirely, I ended by saying, " And I have to point out Mr Evil, no problem with 'making money', just with 'taking money'. My standard of living is dependent on the former, as is your own, but destroyed by the latter."

And then, trying to get back on topic, " But can we agree then, regarding your comments on 'graft and corruption', that Libertarianz is the only party that can offer a solution for that, namely by taking politicians out of positions where they have the ability to interfere with business and the private sector, such as evidenced by this debacle?"

On which we 'apparently' agreed, but of course, we did not. 

Debate ongoing

... some far-lefty Trotskyist blog from the links. Good to see they're paying attention.

Now I'm being quoted on other blogs. Does anybody know anything about this blogger. Note the comment I have tagged onto his post.