who is chatting on SOLO ChatThe Free RadicalPopular contentWho's newWho's onlineThere are currently 6 users and 15 guests online.
PollWhat should the government do about ailing financial institutions? Nothing, except to back off and get out—as any Objectivist knows, intervention is treating the disease with the disease 83% Intervene judiciously—enough to avert a catastrophe that is otherwise imminent 3% Intervene massively—as it's doing 3% Nationalize the whole economy and be done with it. Bring on the USSA! 1% Something else (specify) 11% Total votes: 80
|
What's Keeping Them Behind?Submitted by Callum McPetrie on Thu, 2008-10-09 08:49.
Auckland Mayor John Banks is pledging, that for the 2011 World Cup, $20,000 will be put into "a development plan to manage homelessness", and $197,000 will be spent on cleaning up graffiti around the city. First off, the $197,000 to be spent on cleaning up graffiti. How do you need $197,000 for the relatively simple job of cleaning up graffiti? The last time I checked, it only takes some cleaning materials, buckets and a few volunteers willing to put their time into cleaning the graffiti up to make a city clean again. Preferably, however, the hooligans who actually do the graffiti should, at any possible chance, be made to clean it up themselves. But rather than cleaning up only the graffiti they've drawn, make it a several day task, at multiple locations in pink overalls. Don't just let them get away with only a light warning. Secondly, the homeless issue. $20,000 to simply keep them off the city streets during the weeks occupied by the Rugby World Cup will do NOTHING to alleviate the problem. Instead, the labour regulations keeping them from working in a productive job, even if it is for little, should be scrapped. And even though regulation like that is a national issue, the City (and Regional) Council can do its part as well, by moving restrictive regulations such as "Urban Boundaries", which merely serve to keep house prices artificially high. Don't require buildings to need permits, scrap the RMA, and any other such legislation that makes the idea of owning a home close to work an impossibility, even for the middle class. More government spending never helps in the long run.
( categories: )
|
User loginFeatured BookNavigation |
Seconded - not devils advocate
197 k is a bargain to clean up Auckland city. I don' think it's alot of money.
kkulak
Devils advocate
You can't clean graffiti off like mud - you have to paint over it. And as often as not, that means matching the right colour paint and painting the WHOLE AREA, essentially. And paint is stupidly expensive. Then there are the vans to drive the volunteers around, pick up the paint, drop off the volunteers (and petrol for all this), get ladders, dropcloths, rollers, brushes, and everything else you need. And this is assuming you have volunteers! Personally if I owned a building I would rather pay a few students to do a good job on my terms rather than rely on the kindness and availability of volunteers. (Surely there are more productive things for such volunteers to do?)
So, I hate to say it, but $197,000 is really a bargain to clean up a whole city (but that's another question to ask: just how much grafiti are we talking about here). We could probably fundraise that much quite easily in a libertarian society - the obvious corporate sponsor would be Guthrie Bowrons or Resene paint!