Auckland local authorities plan on using taxpayers money to 'fight' Telecom ...

Duncan Bayne's picture
Submitted by Duncan Bayne on Thu, 2006-03-02 00:06.

I'm not sure which is the worst part of this story - my pick is the utter insanity of the idea of 'intangible social and economic benefits'.

I've already had a brief email discussion with New Zealand blogger David Farrar who thinks the idea has promise, and is in fact hoping to meet the toadying retards responsible to obtain more information. David is, of course, a supporter of the National Party, who are supposedly the party that represents "Individual freedom and choice", "Competitive enterprise and rewards for achievement", and "Limited government".

I am starting to worry about the future of this country.

Councils keen to fight telco

Auckland local authorities are investigating building a broadband network in Auckland to take on Telecom.

The seven local councils and the Auckland Regional Council are concerned the region's economic and social well-being is being stunted by Telecom's virtual broadband monopoly.

...

A report being considered by Auckland City's economic development committee today said the key argument for Government involvement was that broadband was an essential infrastructure with intangible social and economic benefits that market forces could not provide.

...


Not helped by the Local Government Act

Scott Wilson's picture

as local authorities are required to look after the "social, economic, environmental and cultural wellbeing" of their communities - which justifies anything.

Telstra Clear got agreement a few years ago from Transit NZ to run cable along the motorway corridor to connect up its planned local network - and Transit would pay for some capacity to link up its traffic warning signs, and cameras. However, Telstra Clear sees the future in lobbying government - if it remains a flat no to local loop unbundling, there could be interest in another network, like there was before. The Wellington and Christchurch networks haven't been a disaster (though the Christchurch one is a marginal investment at best), especially in gaining around 30% market share.

David Farrar is simply playing the consumer lobbyist game - demanding producers kowtow to what consumers want - if it was any other sector he'd be against it, and he knows it, but doesn't believe in a better answer.


Sounds entirely feasible.

Duncan Bayne's picture

Sounds entirely feasible. Of course, they're hoping to do it with a generous handout of other people's money.

Situation normal in business here in N.Z. Look at the film industry, medicine, law, health & safety, aviation, power, transport ... all sucking off the taxpayer's tit.


Watch Vector

Frizzy's picture

I think Vector wants to hop on the broadband bandwagon, esp with their thrust to upgrade the power network, which includes their fibre optical network...


The most disgusting part ...

Andrew Bates's picture

is that the council that stopped TCL building out a network through their bureaucratic regulations and will now develop it themselves - with rates (taxes) extorted from TCL (not that I have much sympathy for those corporate welfare bludgers).

It's just so damn socialist - people don't see the big picture of what's happening, they applaud what little bits they see.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.