TAS Op-Ed: Scientology, Seizures, and Science

The Atlas Society's picture
Submitted by The Atlas Society on Tue, 2009-01-13 20:26

Scientology, Seizures, and Science
By Edward Hudgins

January 13, 2009

Jett Travolta, the sixteen-year-old son of actors John Travolta and Kelly Preston, died recently of what the autopsy found to be a seizure. The boy had a history of seizures and unconfirmed reports suggest that his parents acted responsibly to ensure he was on medication to mitigate his condition.

We don't know yet what caused the seizure-a change in medication or dosage, or a worsening of the underlying condition that caused the seizures.

I've held in my arms a dear loved-one during her seizures, someone who fortunately now survives and flourishes thanks to modern medicine. Thus I can identify personally with the dangers of such conditions and appreciate the imperative to understand and treat them.

And we can all have sympathy for Travolta and Preston and hope that progress in medical science can reduce the number of such tragedies so that other parents can be spared terrible grief and suffering.

But there's a sad irony here: Scientology, the religion to which Travolta and Preston belong, and other irrational belief systems have, in principle and practice, always stood in the way of such progress.

Scientology was created by sci-fi writer L. Ron Hubbard. Its secret teachings apparently maintain that 75 million years ago the galactic tyrant Xenu anaesthetized billions of his enemies; flew them in spaceships to Earth; dropped them into volcanoes and nuked them; and collected their ghosts- called "thetans"-in giant theaters to show them movies that left them thoroughly confused and wandering aimlessly on our planet.

"So what?" you might ask. "All religions have weird beliefs." True! Mormons believe that God lives around the star Kolob with his wife. Catholics believe that the bread they eat at communion is the actual, real, no-fooling flesh of Jesus. And Muslims believe that Mohammad flew to heaven on a winged horse.

But Scientologists believe that all of what they deem as psychological and mental problems stem from thetans that inhabit each of us from birth and that such problems should never be treated with medication. Actor and high-profile Scientologist Tom Cruise made headlines in 2003 for denouncing actress Brooke Shields for taking the drug Paxil for her postpartum depression.

It is probably true that too many in the psychology field pass out pill bottles rather than deal with patients' underlying problems and that over-medication causes some suffering. There is need among health professionals, those who suffer such problems, and their families and friends for serious critical thinking and study about abuses of drugs.

Yet serious critical thinking is just what Scientologists reject. Their beliefs are not based on evidence, serious thought, or a search for the truth but, rather, on a refusal to question critically, their own self- delusions, and, many would argue, outright brainwashing. Can an honest individual really believe the Xeno nonsense? Do Hubble telescope photos, archeological finds, or MRI brain scans support this belief? Of course not!

Yet Scientologists argue against the use of medications for psychological and mental problems not based on sound science but, rather, on their own bizarre fantasies. They favor a pseudo-science practice called "auditing" that is supposed to clear individuals of those pesky thetans.

In point of fact, research on the brain in recent decades reveals the biological basis for many aspects of human behavior and for many psychological and mental problems. That research is allowing us to refine the way we treat these problems, sometimes involving medications, sometimes not. Many lives have been saved and much suffering-for example, from clinical depression-has been mitigated by such treatments.

"So what?" you might ask again. "Scientology is a small, fringe, flying-saucer religion that attracts eccentric Hollywood types." To begin with, the adherents to this cult and their family members can suffer from the substitution of quackery for proper medication.

But my more general point is that our twenty-first century culture is still riddled with outrageous beliefs that result from a rejection of the rational path to knowledge. Beliefs in astrology, palm reading, tarot cards, and numerology waste time and might cause only limited harm to the individuals who buy into them. But Creationism results in attempts to force schools to teach fairy tales alongside the hard-won knowledge of evolutionary science, as if they were equally valid; such a curriculum would undermine respect for rational approach to knowledge. And the consequences of Scientology and Christian Science- why do science's opponents expropriate the term "science"?-can be deadly.

Life, health, and prosperity on this earth require a commitment by individuals to objective reality and a critical approach to knowledge as well as a culture to support that commitment. How can we promote such a culture? One way is to treat those who advocate beliefs-whether religious, ideological or otherwise- not based on or subject to reason and critical thinking the same way we should treat those who hate others based purely on race or some other accident of birth: their ideas should be legally tolerated but their irrationality treated as ugly and immoral.

It's always sad when a young life like Jett Travolta's is ended so prematurely. For those who value life, such tragedies should reinforce the commitment to reason, our basic tool for survival and flourishing in this world.

---------
Hudgins is executive director of The Atlas Society, the Center for Objectivism.

For further reading:

Edward Hudgins, " Is Miss Cleo a Criminal? She Certainly is a Fraud." March 18, 2002, also published in An Objectivist Secular Reader, a June 2008 collection edited Hudgins and available from The Objectivism Store.

"Interview" with John Bechtel, a former Jehovah's Witness. Navigator, April 2000.

email: tas@atlassociety.org
phone: 202 AYN RAND (296 7263)
web: http://www.atlassociety.org


( categories: )

You're right Sandi

gregster's picture

about Hsieh anyway.

My thoughts exactly Sandi

HWH's picture

I admit that reason is a small and feeble flame, a flickering torch by stumblers carried in the starless night, -- blown and flared by passion's storm, -- and yet, it is the only light. Extinguish that, and nought remains.- - Robert Green Ingersoll

Diana's opinion

Sandi's picture

is that there is a time and a place for reason and that one must be sensitive to when one wants to voice it. Her
sensitivity is self imposed political correctness. Whilst she might not agree with mysticism, she chooses tolerance during times of tragedy and she scorns a voice of reason for its timing & insensitivity.

I couldn't disagree with her more. In my view tolerance should not come at the price of or indeed the sacrifice of, reason, value or integrity for that matter.

As an example, it is the sacrifice of reason & value to tolerance & sensitivity, that endangers the lives of American soldiers fighting in Iraq with one arm tied behind their backs. The same sacrifice to sensitivity is embraced by the US government, which assumes dual responsibility of the protection of the lives of its soldiers and the adherents of the ideology they are allegedly fighting.

The same applies to Israel who is allegedly fighting Hamas with one hand whilst feeding its supporters with the other.

It is irrational not to voice or apply reason and it is immoral to concede to restrictions around doing both.

Diana doesn't

Rick Pasotto's picture

Excellent Work!

Sandi's picture

I think that this a terrific article.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.