Did Margaret Thatcher change the world for the better?
Yes, but socialism won in the end.
No, but she might inspire the next generation.
Other (please explain)
Total votes: 22
Distribution and our Political Masters
Submitted by Mark Hubbard on Tue, 2010-12-07 03:20
Oh dear oh dear.
So, in summation:
1) This group of people are either so incompetent, or so dishonest, or, a mixture of the two, that they can't even be relied upon to manage a simple system of reimbursements, such as in normal circumstances could be instituted at any high school.
2) This same group of individuals are responsible for a government spend that makes up almost half the (unproductive, wealth destroying) spending in our entire economy.
3) This same group have carte blanche power to take my earnings from me, to pay for this government spend, and for their perks, sorry, reimbursements.
Well, I guess as is the looters philosophy that underlies our age, as stated by Kim Jong Hickey on his own site just today - http://www.solopassion.com/nod... - people create wealth. In the end it needs to be distributed; and it's fitting, therefore, that this is the dishonest and/or incompetent group to do it.
[That's me for today; got to do some work to pay the tax.]
More SOLO Store
The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand
Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand