who is chatting on SOLO ChatThe Free RadicalPopular contentWho's newWho's onlineThere are currently 7 users and 11 guests online.
PollWhat should the government do about ailing financial institutions? Nothing, except to back off and get out—as any Objectivist knows, intervention is treating the disease with the disease 83% Intervene judiciously—enough to avert a catastrophe that is otherwise imminent 3% Intervene massively—as it's doing 3% Nationalize the whole economy and be done with it. Bring on the USSA! 1% Something else (specify) 11% Total votes: 80
|
ConcordanceSubmitted by wsscherk on Mon, 2006-05-01 12:41.
Here's a link to a post that I dithered on putting on SOLO or RoR. Since I was intruding on a conversation in a thread initiated there, but in reference to events here in the SOLO archipelago, I thought it best to post a note. Lest I be thought of as being silly and not worthwhile . . . sample scrapbook below. What is 'dialectical dishonesty? -- essay? Personal blog entry? Part-scholarly document? WSS
( categories: )
|
User loginFeatured BookNavigation |
We are none of us as smart as we think we are . . .
. . . he said, humbly, since it took over two hours for the sly humour of Jody's note to sink into the large Scherk-ish head . . .
Thanks, J-Man -- I no longer keep a journal, but I would have a lot of redacting/de-nonsensifying to do to calm the several who think me 'poo-poo head.' Howzabout I just mentally burn all my bad thoughts?
Sun & Book Burning XCIIv . . .
WSS
William
Since this is your "personal blog entry", better also, just for safe measure, tidy up your journal entries as well if you keep one.
Cresswell: 'Save us the bother of reading your nonsense"
Thanks for the headsup, Peter.
I'll look into the possibility of working with Giles -- especially if we meet sometime this year during his time in Canada.
With regard to 'saving you the bother,' I don't see that as my role in Blog 46. You have already been warned by Lindsay Perigo that my stuff is 'silly' and 'not worthwhile,' so what are you doing with yourself by reading it, pray tell?
Seriously, I don't mind if you give me a pass, but I do not understand such contentless critiques as 'nonsense.' This is not good faith, to my eyes, this is just an expression of denigration.
If that's all you got to say, great, thanks, I will no longer direct my thoughtbeams towards you, and, when adding new material, think to myself: "Peter Cresswell will not be reading this" -- and act accordingly with this hypothesis.
In any case, Blog 46 and your own blog here are rather minor quasars in the online universe . . . I don't know how much deeper into the shadows I could withdraw . . .
WSS
More nonsense
Perhaps you and Rick could start a site somewhere yourselves. Perhaps then you might each have at least one other person laughing at your 'jokes,' and save us the bother of reading your nonsense.
However you made that
However you made that "movie" poster, that is pretty funny.