To the Conquerors of Space

Craig Ceely's picture
Submitted by Craig Ceely on Sat, 2012-08-25 23:35

That was one major museum I missed, in my two trips to Moscow. And that's really the name of the thing -- we think of the Soviets and all of their works as dull and drab and -- if you've been to Moscow, you'll agree -- but that's the name of the place, and I find it poetic and inspiring. And I'm still sorry I missed it.

The Soviets, of course, put the first object into space, the first mammal into space, and the first man into space. Another of my Moscow regrets: couldn't find Gagarin's spot in their wall of heroes in the Kremlin.

But we have Neil Armstrong.

We no longer have him, of course, Neil having died today at the age of 82. But we really did conquer space, didn't we, not to the extent that Genghis Khan conquered anything, but we left this earth -- we, well, we sent brave souls up and up and out, and brought them back. The Soviets did, and we did. Orbits, space walks, catastrophic errors (Apollo 1 and 13), misjudged landings (we sank one of ours in the Pacific, and one of the Soviet missions landed in such a remote part of Kazakhstan that the crew found themselves wedged in a tree, literally fending off wolves by the time they were rescued) and dramatic photography.

And the moon.

As the World Trade Center was being built in lower Manhattan, and the four Beatles were recording their final album, Abbey Road, as both war and peace raged in and over Vietnam, men in crew cuts and unstylish shirts and ties were using their slide rules and log tables to send Neil Armstrong and Ed Aldrin to the moon (Aldrin actually carried a six-inch yellow Pickett slide to the surface of the moon itself).

America's astronauts were, in the 1960s, recruited from the ranks of test pilots, many of whom mocked the astronauts for not really flying: "You're riding in a tin can," they'd laugh.

Gagarin and Glenn rode their tin cans 'round the earth. Heroes both. Brave souls. Conquerors of space.

The so-called "space race" of the 1960s turned out to be a farce, of course. As either Mises or Rand could have predicted, the USSR could never keep up with the US efforts in the race to the moon, and they realized that. So they concentrated, instead, on sending unmanned missions to Mars and to Venus (noteworthy in their own right), while the US forged on with the Apollo project: a manned mission to the moon.

And in July of 1969 Michael Collins brought Neil Armstrong and Ed Aldrin to within firing distance of the lunar surface, and off they went. The first men to touch the surface of the moon landed without injury, without incident. With less computing power than you now have in your cell phone, Collins put them in place, Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon itself and sent radio messages from the lunarscape and took photographs of it -- as well as a stunningly beautiful image of our blue earth -- and then returned to Collins' command module -- and, safely, back home.

There's always more to the story, though, isn't there? More than twenty years ago I sat in an office with my boss at the time, a Marine Corps gunnery sergeant, and we were talking about the space program. "Shepard pissed his pants," said the gunny.

I immediately objected. "Oh, come on! Shepard was an experienced test pilot, he'd trained and trained and trained for this mission, and the flight itself was only fifteen minutes long! There's no way he'd have just gotten that scared at the last minute!"

The gunny looked at me as if I were being an idiot, which, in context, I was. "Sergeant Ceely," he said slowly, "yes, the flight itself was only fifteen minutes long. The mission, though? Shepard sat in that tin can for eight hours. I never said he got scared. How many cups of coffee have you had this morning?"

Eight hours. Okay, I was humbled by that argument. Armstrong and Aldrin only spent two and a half hours on the moon itself. They actually damaged their lunar module when they got back into it, a circuit breaker needed for activating the launch sequence itself. They broke another item -- a pen -- and used that to set the circuit breaker so they could fire up and leave the lunar surface. As they lifted off and flew back to the command module, Collins noted that they flew as straight and direct as if it were an elevator headed right to his ship.

A pen. A pen. Ever wished you had that presence of mind, that kind of calm courage? Armstrong and Aldrin did, a quarter of a million miles away from home.

Again, your cell phone has far, far more computing power than three men relied upon at those moments.

Test pilot, tin can: the man went to the moon. These days, amateur radio operators have bounced signals off the planet Venus and back to the earth -- an astounding achievement, really; it is routine for hams to use satellites to pass signals or even to build such satellites themselves, and to send them into space; and bouncing signals off the moon is a popular part of the hobby. But it's still a big deal that we can put scientific craft on Mars or that India can put an object on the moon, or that we can send craft entirely outside our solar system and still receive signals back from them. And we have. We have done all of those things.

But Neil? You went there and you came back, partner.

The Russians have it right: Conquerors of Space.

And you, Neil, were one of them.


Rare 1969 Video Footage That DOES Still Exist!

Rosie's picture

But of all the moon music, you can't really beat Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata - here played by Wilhelm Kempff:

Aha! Googled it and found something that looks relevant!

Rosie's picture

Here it is!

The Moon Landing Conspiracy Theories

It is quite long - I haven't read it critically yet - but, at a glance, it looks as though every doubt raised has been addressed by somebody/somebodies at the very least.

It does seem odd to me that the footage of such an important event couldn't be found by NASA, though; doesn't it to you? Perhaps the article will provide an acceptable explanation!

Yes I've heard those doubts before...

Marcus's picture

...and never for once believed them.

What I find funny is the number of people in Austria who believe the moon landings were faked.

Some of them are relatives of mine.

When I tell them it is bollocks they don't really make an argument. They just shrug their shoulders and say, "who knows?"

It's just an article of faith which is perpetuated by some tabloid newspapers in Europe for some reason.

Marcus

Rosie's picture

I don't know, Marcus.

I just remember the authority of the man I heard and him being very persuasive. I recall him talking about the Cold War and the need for the USA to show greater scientific superiority over Russia which had been going to space for years before the US. He also mentioned it being a distraction from the Vietnam War and used so that the US could pull out without it being top billing, so to speak. There was more he said about radiation levels and other scientific stuff that was over my head but he made it sound very plausible, I must say.

Some years later I was reminded of what he said when I read that NASA couldn't find the video footage of the Apollo 11 moon landing.

I had an idea (probably wrong) that the later Apollo missions all failed in some respect with reports of the lunar module crashing or the Apollo 13 flight returning with the three astronauts on board due to terrible problems and difficulties they experienced. I think I may have seen a film that was made about this ages ago.

It is probably just another one of those conspiracy theories. My son, Sam, told me today, when I asked him about it, that Mythbusters has removed most of the doubts raised and that he believes the landing occurred. And if Sam (the Authority) says it is true then who am I to doubt?!

Had you heard those doubts raised about the legitimacy of Apollo 11 and landing on the moon before?

Um Rosie...

Marcus's picture

...how about the Apollo Missions 11 to 17, excluding aborted 13? They all went to the moon.

Do you think they were all faked too?

Wernher Von Braun

Rosie's picture

One of the Comments below the Video says:

"This is Lehrer's way of showing how ridiculous it was that Von Braun became a hero. It's the same anger he expressed at Henry Kissinger winning the Nobel Peace Prize. These guys did horrible things, and yet all that seems to get brushed away as soon as they start working for the right people. "

Re Neil Armstrong and the moon landing, I have my doubts about anyone ever having landed on the moon. I was told a long time ago by "a man who thought he knew the lot" that it would be easier to land that lunar module on Mars than the moon.

Curious, too, that not a soul nor another lunar module - not even the space shuttle - has been "back", isn't it.

There was more than pure luck

Tom Burroughes's picture

There was more than pure luck to NA: the man was a highly talented aviator, fighter pilot, test pilot, technical and scientific specialist, teacher. He worked damned hard; he got his pilot's licence when 18, when most kids his age are considered too young to buy a drink legally in the US. He made his luck by putting himself in the frame, by being the best, sharpest, coolest man on hand that was available.

If ever there is a story about how application and attitude and get you to the peak, his is one of the best.

An Armstrong close shave

gregster's picture

Saw this today. Good footage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?f...

I see Ed's already on it.

No he didn't just die...

Marcus's picture

...if you remember correctly when Von Braun did die the nation mourned and the President saluted him as a hero. There were calls for him to have a state funeral and his life and works were constantly referenced.

I don't mean to belittle Armstrong. You won't hear anymore from me on this. You might read something though Eye

Facts are facts

Craig Ceely's picture

"...although I believe October Sky does not specifically reference Von Braun's life. At least that's what Wikipedia says."

Actually doesn't mention him at all, does it, Joe? -- except for the scene in which the lead character receives a letter and autographed photo from von Braun on the occasion of his birthday. Speaking of occasions, it was Neil Armstrong who just died, not von Braun. And it's von Braun's name on the gate in Huntsville, not Armstrong's. Say what you like (and by all evidence, you will): He's not forgotten at all, and he was never ignored -- but he's not the one who just died the other day, either.

I first discovered Van Braun's achievements...

Marcus's picture

...through a BBC documentary,Space Race.
Yes, it took a British broadcaster to inform.

Even then they only did it as a relative comparison with Soviet Korolev. Both men were mostly ignored during their lifetimes. In the USSR it makes sense, but in the US that celebrates individual achievement?

Apparently the famous "right stuff" only dared mention Von Braun briefly, not even using his name. When I went to the bookshop books on the moon or space race either never mention Von Braun or reduce mention of him to one or two sentences.

Nevermind Wikipedia...

Jmaurone's picture

Watch the movie.

Thanks for that reference...

Marcus's picture

...although I believe October Sky does not specifically reference Von Braun's life. At least that's what Wikipedia says.

Von Braun didn't just build it, he sweated bullets each launch, hardly sleeping at all making sure everything was safe. There were no fatalities on his watch so he must have been doing something right, which you can't say the same for the Soviet Program.

Apollo space program director Sam Phillips was quoted as saying that he did not think that America would have reached the moon as quickly as it did without von Braun's help. Later, after discussing it with colleagues, he amended this to say that he did not believe America would have reached the moon at all.

Nope!

Craig Ceely's picture

Can't forget October Sky...that film led to launch of model rockets by yours truly and his son.

And Neil Armstrong was more than just "lucky." He did the first jet landing on the carrier Essex, he flew combat missions in Korea, and he was a test pilot on the X-15 program before becoming the first American civilian in space. And then he went to the moon. Von Braun "built it," all right -- but damn it, so did Neil Armstrong.

Rocket Boys/October Sky

Jmaurone's picture

Don't forget Rocket Boys, and the film version (October Sky).

(I didn't realize we're now celebrating the achievements of others on the day of someone's death...I guess it's part of the whole "you didn't build that" movement...duly noted.)

Correction

Craig Ceely's picture

This is going too far. Who's forgotten von Braun, or written him out of the history books? I knew his name as a kid, as did most other Americans. I'd say "all," but that's assuming a bit much. The space center at Redstone Arsenal (Huntsville, Alabama) is named after him. So is a crater on the moon, but I've never been there.

Nothing about von Braun has been swept under the rug, any rug. He is in fact celebrated, as he should be. If he's not as famous as Neil Armstrong, well, damn few people are.

A tribute to Neil Armstrong and the team behind him...

Jmaurone's picture

"Heroes", by Bryan Larsen (photo from the Quent Cordair Fine Art website).

Why are the most important men...

Marcus's picture

...always written out of the history of the US and USSR space programs?

Well firstly they weren't American or Soviet and secondly they were Germans who worked for the NAZIs on the V2 rocket.

It pains both of them to remember their debt to NAZI science therefore it is simply written out of the history books.

Werner von Braun worked for NAZI and then NASA designing all rockets up until the Apollo 11 and leaving the designs for the space shuttle on his desk.

Since he left the space program has hardly advanced in "great leaps" but crawled along in baby steps.

Was he hailed as the "greatest American", were statues put up in his honour? Hell no! Better just sweep that all under the rug.

Armstrong was a great pilot who had a lot of luck, better just remember him. Fantastic achievement, but just give Americans what they want -slices of all American Hero like Apple Pie. Just don't mention the genius in the back room. It's all a bit embarrassing.

And meanwhile...

Craig Ceely's picture

Yes, I can agree with you, but let's not sully Armstrong's memory.

Yes

Kiwiwit's picture

Exactly. Not taking anything away from the achievements of the Curiousity mission, but it seems all America is capable of now is what the Soviets were doing back in the 1960s. In fact, the USA with its Socialist president is intent on emulating most of the Soviet "achievements".

Except that....

Craig Ceely's picture

...in referring to "unmanned missions to Mars and to Venus," I was referring to the Soviet missions of the 1960s.

USA is the loser now

Kiwiwit's picture

Would've thought that 43 years after the USA so convincingly won the space race that the most it could achieve is to emulate the loser ("sending unmanned missions to Mars and to Venus")?

And...

Craig Ceely's picture

...thank you, sir. That's exactly what you should have said to him.

But: tough shit. Things are a lot worse than that, are they not?

As I believe I have pointed out -- to you, Richard, and to others -- before this.

"This is a fucking space agency."

Richard Goode's picture

"This is a fucking space agency."

What I would have said to Obama.

Oh please, Richard, relax...

Craig Ceely's picture

it's a lot worse than disgusting.

The statist in chief of America...

Marcus's picture

...instructs the men of the stars to bow down to the sand niggers!

And when he says "you didn't build that space program" you can't say anything in return.

What next for NASA?

Richard Goode's picture

What next for NASA?

Are dominantly Muslim nations feeling better yet?

That is truly SICK

Richard Goode's picture

NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said in a recent interview that his "foremost" mission as the head of America's space exploration agency is to improve relations with the Muslim world.

Way beyond DISGUSTING.

One giant leap (backwards)...

Jmaurone's picture

Marcus wrote: "All the west can do these days is wank off about how much we need the state, that very state having completely destroyed what was supposed to be the "space age". Not space age any more, but age of the statists!"

Ain't it the truth...Saw this yesterday, via Bosch Fawstin:


NASA Chief: Next Frontier Better Relations With Muslim World

NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said in a recent interview that his "foremost" mission as the head of America's space exploration agency is to improve relations with the Muslim world.

Though international diplomacy would seem well outside NASA's orbit, Bolden said in an interview with Al Jazeera that strengthening those ties was among the top tasks President Obama assigned him. He said better interaction with the Muslim world would ultimately advance space travel.

"When I became the NASA administrator -- or before I became the NASA administrator -- he charged me with three things. One was he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math, he wanted me to expand our international relationships, and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science ... and math and engineering," Bolden said in the interview.

...

He said the United States is not going to travel beyond low-Earth orbit on its own and that no country is going to make it to Mars without international help.

Bolden has faced criticism this year for overseeing the cancellation of the agency's Constellation program, which was building new rockets and spaceships capable of returning astronauts to the moon. Stressing the importance of international cooperation in future missions, Bolden told Al Jazeera that the moon, Mars and asteroids are still planned destinations for NASA.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politic...

Great, Craig

gregster's picture

"Aldrin actually carried a six-inch yellow Pickett slide to the surface of the moon itself" and emotional.

We are going to go through...

Marcus's picture

...this all again with Buzz, aren't we? I loved it when he punched out a conspiracy theorist recently who said the moon landing didn't happen.

I love the moon landing and don't need to talk about the near misses and the great human achievement.

However to those that sneer that this couldn't have happened without state involvement, I sneer back what a fucking missed opportunity.

The reason space travel (or moon exploration) has not moved one inch since then is because it has not been exploited for profit.

The west should be ashamed. The closest contender we have for a colonisation is a communist country China because they want to mine (yes mine) the moon for raw materials.

All the west can do these days is wank off about how much we need the state, that very state having completely destroyed what was supposed to be the "space age". Not space age any more, but age of the statists!

Craig...

Marcus's picture

...in NZ the school terms are different.

The summer school vacation is from October/November through Christmas.

July is normal school time. There is a mid term break in August for two weeks only.

Well done

Hugo Schmidt's picture

Great post. I just wish I'd have known that era myself.

Explaining Soviet Space Success

Pete L's picture

Craig,

I enjoyed your tribute. We must salute anyone who achieves something remarkable, and Neil certainly qualifies and then some. As do all of the project leaders and visionaries who made the achievement possible.

I hope you don't mind if I slightly hijack your thread a bit, but staying within the same topic. It is taken for granted among Objectivists and libertarians that the capitalist engine is the greatest tool for innovation. The idea is that man's mind is free to pursue the (seemingly) impossible if he so chooses and reap the rewards of that effort (or conversely, the impact of the failure).

With the slave state that the USSR was, how do we explain their remarkable space successes, particularly the fact that they beat the U.S. on some key landmarks with respect to space travel? While both the U.S. and Soviet Union were large government programs, the U.S. had the benefit of a competitive for-profit aerospace and defense industry to draw upon. Were the Soviet scientists and program administrators motivated by national glory alone?

This question is relevant today because among the many who are pushing for a massive state intervention in the economy in the U.S., many point to the innovations that were spawned from government efforts (which coincidentally are mostly defense related, such as the beginning of networked computers, GPS etc). Many also say, perhaps correctly, that space travel and exploration was ONLY first possible with an entity like the government who can allocate vast sums of money on something that might not pan out and which was extremely dangerous. They say that the private space industry that is emerging owes quite a tip of the cap to the knowledge and technologies it is drawing upon.

Linz...

Craig Ceely's picture

You were in school at the time?

I have a similar memory myself, of Tampa, Florida.

But it was JULY, for cryin' out loud! Are we deluded or what?

Very nicely done, Sergeant Ceely

Lindsay Perigo's picture

A stellar salute. And you captured the era beautifully. I remember being in 6th Form geography class in a small town called Feilding listening to Richard Nixon in Washington talking to Neil Armstrong on the moon. If ever anything collective were real, it was the universal glow felt by all people of good will at that time.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.