Islamofascism And The Age Of Treason

tvr's picture
Submitted by tvr on Fri, 2013-11-15 05:23

"In the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying." - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf.

The term 'Islamofascism' refers not only to an analogy of two political ideologies, it also identifies a contemporaneous political camaraderie that has existed for almost 100 years.

History is a continuum and so should be viewed as such. Nazism and fascism didn't just die at the end of the Second World War along with the then apparent deaths of Hitler and Mussolini. They have lived on in the minds of the millions of surviving Nazis and fascists and those of their offspring who have gone on to become influential players in the world affairs these last 70 or so years.

Arab Muslims were among those who most admired Hitler, with many Arab countries importing variations of his antisemitic fascist ideology to their political regimes during and post WWII, including Iraq, Syria, Palestine, Egypt and Lebanon to name a few. Both the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem in Palestine Muhammad Amin al-Husayni and the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt Hassan al-Banna were admirers and allies of Hitler. Hitler was recorded in his later years as saying that he considered Islam to be an ideal religion to complement Nazism, lamenting how Germans in his time were Christian and not "Mohammedan".

Islamofascism, by which I mean political and/or militant Islam, is embodied today among Sunni Muslims by the Saudi-financed Wahhabis, the Pakistani jihadists known as Jama'atis, and the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood [update 6/8/14: and by the self-proclaimed "Islamic State" formerly called ISIS in Syria and Iraq]. Among Shia Muslims, it is exemplified by Hezbollah in Lebanon, by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and those loyal to him in Iran, and by Hamas in Palestine.

Now and then:

The West is not participating in a new war today, but the revival of an old one.

"Al-Qa’ida is the product of an Arab fascist group that was set up in the 1920s, funded by Adolf Hitler, used by British, French and American Intelligence after WWII, and later was supported by the Saudis and reactivated by the CIA." ~ John Loftus, US Department Of Justice Prosecutor of Nazi War Criminals

The following interview is a must see. John Loftus is in a unique position to inform us about the link between WWII Nazism and today's Islamofascism. He worked for the US Department of Justice in the Office of Special Investigations which was charged with prosecuting and deporting Nazi war criminals in the US. He was given a level security clearance that gave him access to files that only a tiny handful of people in history have ever had access to. He now considers himself an historian and an author:

In order to grasp the state of affairs today and the un-mentionable war we all find ourselves in, we should turn to quotes by the master of war himself, Sun Tsu, and see how they relate to the facts before us:

"What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations. There is no instance of a nation benefitting from prolonged warfare."

The latest report on the cost of the US wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan is that they will cost American taxpayers up to $6 trillion, making the US' response to 9/11 “the most expensive and prolonged war in US history", with no end in sight.

"Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win."

Prior to 9/11, the Muslim Brotherhood established powerful lobby groups to conduct "lawfare" in the West and managed to place operatives in the bowels of western governments, including in the CIA and the White House; European Muslim populations had been growing exponentially in Western countries due to the UN's multiculturalist agenda foisted on western governments combined with the high Muslim birth rate, whereby stronghold communities of politically motivated Muslims were established in key cities across Europe; the Saudis acquired full ownership of ARMACO from US oil companies and grew it into the most valuable company in the world worth trillions of dollars, then spent billions of its profits funding madrases all around the world indoctrinating young Muslims into anti-West antisemitic Wahhabi Muslims; other Arab oil producing states nationalized their oil industries, which, together with the environmentalist policies adopted in the West, made the West dependent on Islamic states for oil; the CIA secretly funded, armed and helped train a large militia of Muslim Brotherhood members to fight against the Soviets in the Soviet-Afghan war - a militia that came to be known as al-Qaeda (see Loftus interview video above); Pakistan obtained the nuclear bomb thus becoming the first nuclear armed Islamic state; the percentage of US citizens enrolled for active military service halved from what it had been just 30 years earlier (and is at present less than a third of what it was during the Vietnam War).

So, had the Islamofascists been actively and strategically preparing to wage war against the West, and the US in particular, pre-9/11? The question is not whether they had been, but for how long, and with whose help.

"And therefore those skilled in war bring the enemy to the field of battle and are not brought there by him."

From Wikipedia: "The military of the United States is deployed in more than 150 countries around the world, with 172,966 of its active-duty personnel serving outside the United States and its territories. Most of these overseas personnel are deployed in combat zones in the Middle east, as part of the War on Terror."

"It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle."

Americans have elected and now re-elected a president who is Socialist in all but name, and who has gone to great lengths to hide his Islamic past, dodgy connections and "university years". Regarding the latter, perhaps the following video has something to do with the silence and mystery, along with Obama's known visit/s to and connections in Pakistan in 1980s and the pledge in his autobiographical book Audacity of Hope [p260-261] where he essentially says that if push ever came to shove he would "stand by ... Arab and Pakistani Americans" (90+% of whom happen to be Muslim) rather than the rest of America should there ever be a war time confrontation between the two:

It is unmistakably implied in what Percy Sutton says in the interview that Obama's Harvard years were funded by the Saudi Royals.

The man he mentions approaching him to endorse Obama at Harvard, Dr Khalid al Mansour from Texas, was a black nationalist Muslim author and lawyer on the payroll of the Saudi Royal family. Al Mansour has written many books on the struggle of bringing Islam to the West. Al Mansour has refused to comment on the revelation disclosed by Sutton, and his Wikipedia page was mysteriously deleted shortly after the interview went to air.

Before concluding that Sutton is a doddering old fool, keep in mind he was "a prominent black American political and business leader. A civil-rights activist and lawyer, he was also a Freedom Rider and the legal representative for Malcolm X. He was the highest-ranking African-American elected official in New York City when he was Manhattan borough president from 1966 to 1977, the longest tenure at that position. He later became an entrepreneur whose investments included the New York Amsterdam News and the Apollo Theater in Harlem." It is evident in the video that Sutton's thinking had become sluggish, but surely it is much more likely that any mental deterioration is what let the secret slip out, rather than his imagination getting away on him.

Despite all the red flags, America, in its self-induced blindness over its infatuation with his skin color and American Idol persona voted (and re-voted) Obama into power anyway, and by extension his Islam-coddling socialist-leaning administration along with him.

After his election, Obama wasted no time changing White House vernacular by replacing the term "The Long War" (previously "The War On Terror") with the obfuscatory "Overseas Contingency Operation". Since his re-election, Obama has ordered US military and law enforcement to remove all references to Islam altogether from its training materials.

If one can't name an ideology that proclaims in no uncertain terms that yours (and thus you) is its enemy, or know its nature, how can one defend against it when factions begin to practice it faithfully?

"It is the rule in war, if ten times the enemy's strength, surround them; if five times, attack them; if double, be able to divide them; if equal, engage them; if fewer, be able to evade them; if weaker, be able to avoid them."

Between the lawfare being waged by "moderate" Muslims and the warfare being waged by militant Muslims, the West finds itself being surrounded, attacked and divided by politically and militantly active Muslims everywhere despite Muslims still being a relatively small minority group within Western countries. Meanwhile, all Westerners are hearing from their leaders and the mainstream media is screams of "tolerance" and that "Islam means Peace".

"All warfare is based on deception."

Islam's prophet Muhammed also said "War is deceit". The most deadly terrorist attack on US soil since 9/11, the Fort Hood shooting, involved a Muslim psychiatrist gunning down thirteen unarmed soldiers while yelling praises to Allah. The massacre was and still is being called by the White House and government agencies "work place violence" without any mention of Islam or terrorism. Appeasement and political correctness ... or propaganda?

In 2009, Obama, in an act of unprecedented fealty, gave an unreciprocated bow to the Saudi King on international television. Unbelievably, the White House then denied that the bow ever happened and the subject has never been raised since. Earlier this year, in another unprecedented display of fealty toward Islam, Pope Francis bowed to the Jordanian queen. Are these two very public bows to two of the world's most powerful Muslim rulers by arguably the two most powerful Western rulers mere coincidence? The Islamofascists would like non-Muslims to think so. The bows embolden the Muslim world while confusing and weakening the morale of those in the western world. The quadrillion dollar question is whether the bows were meant to have that effect, or they just happened to.

And who exactly is Barack Hussein Obama, the current commander and chief of the US armed forces, anyway? Where does his true allegiance lie? Despite claiming to be a Christian, the little that we do know about him (but which is seldom if ever reported by the mainstream media) includes:

1) His closest living relatives on his father's side are devout Muslims, including his half-brother who reciprocated being best man at each other's weddings, his uncle, his step-grandmother and cousin. Watch a very interesting al-Jazeera interview with the cousin here);
2) His late father, grandfather and step-father were all Muslim (Obama has stated that his father stopped being a Muslim in later life, but there is no evidence I have seen that supports Obama Snr becoming an apostate except for the President's implying-so. I'll be more inclined to believe the claim if the memoirs of one of Obama's seemingly more trustworthy siblings, Mark Obama Ndesanjo, corroborates the assertion when it is released in September 2014);
3) He was enrolled as a Muslim at his primary school in Indonesia;
4) He can recite the Shahada (a prayer in Arabic, the opening lines of which is the Muslim declaration of faith which Islamic scholars agree  makes one a Muslim when recited) "with a first-class [Arabic] accent" (according to New York Times reporter Nicholas Kristof, as published in the NYT February 27, 2007);
5) Apostasy is arguably the greatest sin in Islam and attracts the death penalty under Islamic law, making it questionable whether Obama tells his immediate family behind closed doors that he is a Christian;
6) There is little evidence of his having a strong commitment to the Christian faith, at least not that I have seen. The only Church that Obama has ever been a member of was one run by Jeremiah Wright, an "ex-Muslim" anti-semetic anti-American black empowerment preacher who earned his masters degree in "Islam in West Africa" and endorsed and travelled with Hitler-admiring Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, and who has stated publicly that Obama considered himself a Muslim when they met, which, if true, would mean that Obama should still be considered a Muslim because he has never said that he has renounced Islam in his "embracing" Christianity. A former New York Times Editor-in-chief claims that he has Wright on tape saying that he “made it comfortable” for Obama to accept Christianity without having to renounce his “Islamic background,”. Furthermore, when asked in a 2004 interview who Jesus is to him, Obama's reply was that Jesus was merely "an historical figure [who] serves as that means of us reaching something higher", one of his many "teachers in history", which is more consistent with an answer that a Muslim would give than a Christian.
7) He has stated that the Muslim call to prayer is for him "one of the prettiest sounds on earth at sunset", and that "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam", and "Let me say this as clearly as I can: The United States is not, and will never be, at war with Islam". Contrast those statements to what the 2nd and 6th Presidents of the US had to say about Islam here and here;
8 ) After receiving flak from the media for his over-arching unreciprocated bow to the Saudi King, he later bowed to the Japanese Emperor when they met (but not quite so obsequiously as he had done with the Saudi King), seemingly for no other reason than to try silence his critics, for he has not bowed publicly to any other head of state since, including to the Pope or the Queen (note: head nods are not bows);
9) He wanted to give Osama bin Laden the respect of Muslim burial rights. With Saudi permission Obama instructed for bin Laden's dead body to be disposed of in the sea within 24 hours of his alleged death without releasing any identifying photographic evidence of the dead body. The world is now left to "trust" bin Laden's wife's testimony and the authenticity of the DNA sample on record as being that of the man whose body was disposed of;
10) He has appointed Chuck Hagel, a renowned Muslim sympathizer and Israeli antagonist, to Secretary of Defense, among numerous other openly Muslim or Muslim-sympathizing appointees from within his administration to various positions of importance and influence.

There are signs everywhere today of a pro-Islamic agenda in Western politics, and in US politics especially, such as this interview with the Obama-appointed NASA administrator which the White House later tried to dismiss:

Then of course there was the Benghazi scandal.

President Woe-bama attracts scandals and suspicion like no other president before him. Why?

I am not claiming that the above short-list constitutes proof that Obama is a crypto-Muslim practicing the Islamic principle of deception, Taqiyya, to push an Islamosfascistic agenda, only that the evidence is compelling and that he seems to care nothing about how much suspicion he generates concerning himself and his true intentions. A man possessing scruples and honor does not only tell the truth, he also does his best to avoid becoming or remaining the subject of suspicion and scandal. Deceivers and liars do not concern themselves with avoiding being the subject of suspicion or scandal, their only concern is with avoiding actual proof of their misdeeds and deceit from surfacing, and if something does surface, from it being believed by those who they are trying to deceive.

""In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy's country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to recapture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them.""

This I believe is huge, yet has been all but ignored by the mainstream media. At the beginning of the year only an exclusive handful of countries were members of the US' Trusted Traveler program called Global Entry, namely Canada, Mexico, South Korea and the Netherlands. It was quietly announced earlier this year that the Global Entry Program which “allows expedited clearance for pre-approved, low-risk travelers upon arrival in the United States”, would be granted to Saudi Arabia(!). 

Here is a short video explaining what that involves:

In August of this year Qatar, India, the UK and Germany have also been added to the program.

Between the three EU countries, 40% of the EU's 15 million Muslims can now apply for and potentially gain easier entry into the US with diminished scrutiny, along with 200 million other Muslims from Near and Central Asia, 30 million of whom live in what are designated as terrorist-sponsoring states (per the State Department's own reports on Saudi Arabia and Qatar). It is not that some Muslims can enter the US more freely that is a concern here, it is the seemingly targeted nature of the program towards Muslims since Obama took office that is, and that countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar are considered more worthy of qualifying for the program than many of the US' formal allies.

According to IPT News  "this development marks the first time that the Saudi government has a direct role in vetting who is eligible for fast-tracked entry into the United States."

Need we be reminded that of the 19 Muslims who hijacked American planes on September 11, 2001, 15 were from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia??

How exactly does excluding trusted allies from having membership in one's "Trusted Traveler program" while adding gateways into the US from the world's most populous and extremist Islamic countries qualify as being "low-risk"??

As if it to give us comfort, US Embassy press attaché Mofid Deak pointed out earlier this year that there are no Saudi citizens on the US black list. “We have actually overcome the crisis of Sept. 11”, he said. While the U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Ford Fraker, has stated that "the overhang of a neutral to a negative reaction to America as a holdover of the 9/11" is now a "corner ... turned". Fraker said that what brought about inviting the Saudis to be members of the program is that "Every time I went to see senior Saudi officials they did not want to talk about Iran or Iraq. They wanted to talk about visas. It was overwhelming the relationship," adding "It wouldn’t have happened if it hadn’t been for the President’s trips and his engagement from the top down."

All this in a year when the Saudi's are warning of a rift taking place in the Kingdom's relations with the US, echoing the Saudi King's warning of August 29, 2001 when he wrote a letter to George W. Bush, published in the Wall Street Journal, which said, "A time comes when peoples and nations part. We are at a crossroads. It is time for the United States and Saudi Arabia to look at their separate interests." Two weeks later America endured its most deadly attack on home soil in its 225 year history.

The Islamofascists know what they want and are smart enough to identify, push for and exploit a golden opportunity when they see it. Easier entry for politically motivated and/or militant Muslims into the US in effect is a lowering of the drawbridge. Any guesses as to who is acting as the Trojan Horse?

CONCLUSION

Civilization Jihad is what the Muslim Brotherhood calls it. The Alliance of Civilizations is what the UN calls it (see below). "Overseas Contingency Operation" is what the White House now calls it. Regardless of its name, the fact of the matter is that a politicized Islam (note that the Qur'an proclaims that the whole Earth belongs to Allah and instructs all Muslims to fight for and foist Islamic ideology on society whenever practical) cannot ever be made compatible with an enlightened civilization (Western or otherwise), i.e., that recognizes individual liberty as being sacrosanct and reason as absolute. Enlightenment recognizes that the source of rights is Natural law (i.e. principles that are discoverable in nature using reason), while Islam instructs that the source of rights is Qur'anic Law (i.e. Allah's literal word). This difference is politically irreconcilable. For Islam to be made compatible with Western civilization qua Western civilization, meaning, with an enlightened West's notions of justice, rights and law, Muslims would need to accept that the Qur'an is not the literal word of God and adopt an interpretation of the Qur'an that ignores much of what is written therein. I submit that that is not possible and I challenge any Muslim reading this to explain how it could be.

A non-submitted Muslim, a partially-submitted Muslim or a Muslim who has submitted to Islam's dictates only on their own rationalized terms are, I submit, all oxymorons.

Apologists for and sympathizers of Islam point towards "secular" Turkey as an example of how an Islamic nation may be made politically compatible with Western civilization. I refute this claim here. And, let us now read what today's democratically elected Prime Minister of Turkey has had to say about his aspirations for and understanding of Islam in today's modern world:

"The modern ruins of the industrial civilization is clearing up and people are curious what will emerge from underneath the rubble - humanity is wondering about the new picture and waiting anxiously. Surely, a new civilization will emerge from underneath the rubble. It will be a new civilization, and this civilization, I believe, will be the rise of an Islamic civilization that will lead the way in the 21st century. It is clear that, no one will be able to stand in the way of this civilization. And it is also clear that, those who help build this new civilization will be rewarded - very very lucratively. And we should also know this: those who do not help the honorable rise of this new civilization, the Islamic civilization, will all be condemned to a life of misery. Muslims will pick up from where they have left off - and they must … For us, democracy can never be a goal … it is but a tool." 1996 speech by Recep Tayyip Erdoğan

And:

"One cannot be both Muslim and secular! You can only be a Muslim or Secular! If you try to put the two together it will have a reverse magnetic effect. It is impossible to keep the two together. Since this is the case, one cannot claim to be a Muslim and then turn around and claim to be secular at the same time. Because God, the creator of the Muslim, holds absolute dominance!" here.

Perhaps "moderate" Indonesia has less grandiose aspirations? Think again:

"The President said Indonesia as the country with the largest Muslim population in the world should be able to contribute to the restoration of the glory of Islamic civilization such as existed in the 14th century.

"Other Muslim countries in the world also hope our country will become a leader in the development of Islamic civilization in the 21st century," the president said.

Islamic leaders in even the most moderate and "secular" countries are ostensibly (albeit tacitly) backing the Muslim Brotherhood's call for "Civilization Jihad".

Perhaps the United Nations is not on the same bandwagon? I submit that they are:

"The United Nations Alliance of Civilizations is "a political initiative of the Secretary General" whose "particular focus is on improving relations within and between Western and Muslim societies and addressing persistent tensions and divides.""

Read: "We're from the government of governments, and we're here to help you welcome and embrace Islam". Evidence of this one way agenda can be seen in the way countries that are supporting the UNAOC are reporting their own actions. Western countries are reporting that they are implementing plans to promote understanding of and tolerance for Islam, while the Islamic countries are reporting that they are promoting the same to Westerners who visit or reside in their countries with little to no promotion of understanding or tolerance of Western ideals and values to Muslims.

Signs of the West committing suicide on account of an Islamofascistic agenda are everywhere. What is one to do about it though?

At the very least, at the personal level each of us must commit to educating ourselves of the facts and truth and sharing our knowledge with all who will listen. As to what action should be taken at a national level, I refer you to this article.

------

"It was not by accident that man conquered the black plague more easily than he conquered tuberculosis. The first appeared in terrifying waves of death that shook the whole of mankind, the other advances insidiously; the first induces terror, the other gradual indifference. The result is, however, that men opposed the first with all the energy they were capable of, whilst they try to arrest tuberculosis by feeble means. Thus man has mastered the black plague, while tuberculosis still gets the better of him.

The same applies to diseases in nations. So long as these diseases are not of a catastrophic character, the population will slowly accustom itself to them and later succumb. It is then a stroke of luck--although
a bitter one--when Fate decides to interfere in this slow process of decay and suddenly brings the victim face to face with the final stage of the disease. More often than not the result of a catastrophe is that
a cure is at once undertaken and carried through with rigid determination.

But even in such a case the essential preliminary condition is always
the recognition of the internal causes which have given rise to the
disease in question."

The important question here is the differentiation of the root causes from the circumstances developing out of them. This becomes all the more difficult the longer the germs of disease remain in the national body
and the longer they are allowed to become an integral part of that body. It may easily happen that, as time goes on, it will become so difficult to recognize certain definite virulent poisons as such that they are
accepted as belonging to the national being; or they are merely tolerated as a necessary evil, so that drastic attempts to locate those alien germs are not held to be necessary."

~ Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

Malik Obama holding a photo of himself with his close friend and younger half brother, the President of the United States:

Obama showing his enthusiasm for and allegiance to America during the National Anthem:


Obama Says ISIS like "JV", Then Denies He Said It

tvr's picture

Earlier this year Obama chose to call ISIS a "JV team", which to someone like me who is more familiar with business than sport reads "Joint Venture team" (to sports fans it means "Junior Varsity team"). Talk about a bad choice of acronym! Obama is now asserting that he was not referring to ISIS when he drew the analogy, even when the facts, independently assessed, show otherwise:

http://www.politifact.com/trut...

And in an open letter parents of a slain Navy SEAL have rebuked Obama by calling him and his administration the real "JV team":

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/0...

Obama: "We Have No Leader"

tvr's picture

Just as Senior Pentagon officials describe the rise of ISIS as ‘apocalyptic’, their commander-in-chief tells the world that the US has no "strategy" at present to deal with it:

ISIS is not new. The terror group was formed in early 2004. Ten years on and no strategy? How can that be?

The word "strategy" is etymologically derived from the Greek word στρατηγία (stratēgia) meaning "office of general, command, generalship", itself derived from στρατηγός (stratēgós) “leader of an army”.

So, what message is Obama actually sending and to whom by broadcasting that the United States does not have a "strategy" to deal with the Islamic jihadists?

Islam

Kyrel Zantonavitch's picture

Islam is on the march all over the place right now. And it isn't some type of strange or unexpected "radical" Islam -- it's just Islam. When Muslims become sincere and honest, or else active and energetic, they're terrifying. When they're fundamentally hypocritical and anti-Islamic, then they're tolerable. Right now they're showing a bit of loyalty to their beliefs. Sad

Neither hypocrite nor whore

tvr's picture

Steve,

Great metaphor.

How to get apostates of nature to see the sun? To paraphrase Marcus Aurelius: demonstrate to doers of harm what they have failed to see themselves.

What does that involve? Putting them right if one is in a position to do so (non self-sacrificially, of course). Where one is not, then to put the matter itself right. And if one is not in a position to do either, then to engage in good-willed avoidance until one finds oneself in such a position.

So...

Jules Troy's picture

How is the world to wipe Islam off the earth without killing them?  Reminds me of the parable of the man with the winter coat.  As the wind blew stronger the man clung to his coat ever harder.  Then when the sun came out he started to sweat and took the coat off by himself.  Now if the wind is  representational of the use of force.  What is the sun?  To me the sun would represent the use of reason and persuasion.  Now the trick is, how to get the damn vermin to see the sun....

Obama Scores "A Great Victory" For The Taliban

tvr's picture

A government which "does not negotiate with terrorists" just has.

Knowing that he would never gain the consent of Congress (i.e., the American people) with his most recent and blatant act of treachery, America's Sultan President has skirted the law yet again, this time using his executive powers - illegally, it seems (but who knows any more what is legal and what is not) - to exchange five top level Taliban leaders held at Guantanamo Bay for an alleged deserter ... an alleged deserter who was a private at the time of his going 'missing' and then promoted to Sergeant only after the Taliban asserted that he had converted to Islam.

Taliban boss Mullah Omar congratulated ‘the entire Afghan Muslim’ nation on its "great victory" after the deal to free Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl went through. Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress are criticizing the Obama administration for not notifying Congress of his intention to release the ‘hardest of the hard core.’

According to Rolling Stone magazine, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl emailed his parents the week prior to his capture confessing that he was "ashamed to be [an] American", and that "the horror that is America is disgusting". He signed off with a final message: "There are a few more boxes coming to you guys," referring to his uniform and books, which he had already packed up and shipped off.

Bergdahl's father, who speaks Afghan (Pashto) and dons a Muslimesque beard, advised his son at the time that "Ethics demands obedience to our conscience" and that he should "Stand with like minded men when possible."

Here is a video of the father standing with a "like-minded man", beginning his address to his son and the people of Afghanistan with an attestation in Arabic of his own fealty to Islam (note Obama's gleeful smile as he does so):

“What none of these media is reporting is that the father’s (SGT Bowe Bergdahl’s father Bob) first words at the WH were in Arabic – those words were “bism allah alrahman alraheem” – which means “in the name of Allah the most gracious and most merciful” – these are the opening words of every chapter of the Qur’an except one (the chapter of the sword – the 9th) – by uttering these words on the grounds of the WH, Bergdahl (the father) sanctified the WH and claimed it for Islam. There is no question but POTUS knows this.” - Clare Lopez, former CIA operations officer, strategic policy and intelligence expert with a focus on Middle East, national defense, WMD, and counterterrorism issues, quoted here.

Terry.

Olivia's picture

This is absolutely brilliant. That interview with John Loftus is worth its weight in gold.

Something To Ponder

tvr's picture

A German Social Science Research Center (WZB) study this month found that roughly 43% of EU's 15 million Muslims believe that the Qur'an's rules are more important than the rules of the country they are living in, that there is only one true and binding interpretation of the Qur'an, and that there needs to be a "return to roots" by all Muslims (see graph below).

By contrast, only around 3% of the EU's 350 or so million Christians agreed with all three of those statements as they relate to Christianity, Christendom and the Bible.

Furthermore, the report finds that young Muslims — most of whom are not immigrants, but were born in Western Europe — are as fundamentalist as older Muslims. A Washington Post critic of the report said that "This finding goes against the received wisdom that 'immigrants' have assimilated by the third generation; a process that used to hold up for most of the 20th century, but seems to have changed in the current interconnected world."

Cheers Lindsay

tvr's picture

I just hope the links do not expire too quickly. It has surprised me how much web content on this subject is being removed, particularly from the more reputable websites. There are a number of other links I could have posted which are now "oops" pages.

Terry

Terry

Lindsay Perigo's picture

You've created a terrific resource here—thank you and bravo! I shall leave it blue-stickied even after I drop it down the page. As Marcus's Global Warming thread is on that subject, it can be the go-to place for posts about the particular form of anti-reason known as Islam.

True Terry

gregster's picture

President Zero is in effect working for the same ends as Islamic totalitarianism.

 

 

Islamofascist Manifesto: OIC's Cairo Declaration

tvr's picture

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) has a permanent delegation to the United Nations, and is the single largest, and one of the most influential and most well funded international organizations in the world outside of the United Nations itself, claiming representation for 1.6 billion Muslims.

The OIC's charter was signed in 1969 and has its administrative office located in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (CDHRI) is a declaration of the member states of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference adopted in Cairo in 1990, which provides an overview on the Islamic perspective on human rights, and affirms Shari'ah (Islamic law) as its sole source.

For the full text of the CDHRI go to http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/i....

Article 1 effectively decrees that everyone in the world is born a Muslim and therefore must accept Allah as their God and Adam as their Patriarch.

Article 2 effectively states that the right to life and safety from bodily harm is guaranteed only to the extent that Sharia says it is, and that killing human beings according to the Sharia is legal so long as it does not cause the whole of mankind to be exterminated.

Article 3 effectively states that old men, women and children are not to be killed in wartime attacks so that they may be given the opportunity to convert to Islam first.

Article 4 effectively states that Muslims must have their good name and honor protected both during life and after death.

Article 5 effectively states that everyone is allowed to engage in sexual intercourse only when married, and encourages and protects the right of all Muslims to get married and produce offspring.

Article 6 effectively states that the husband has the role in Islam to provide for and protect his family while the wife has "duties" she must perform where in return for performing them she is given her own financial independence and may have her tribal links recognized.

Article 7 effectively states that parental rights are prescribed by Sharia and that all children must be raised Muslim.

Article 8 effectively gives people not capable of acting for themselves the right to be represented by a guardian.

Article 9 effectively states that both the state and society are duty-bound to educate everyone on Islam and Sharia so that they may "uncover the secrets of the Universe for the benefit of mankind".

Article 10 effectively outlaws any attempt to convert Muslims away from Islam.

Article 11 effectively outlaws all subjugation except to Islam, and makes it the duty of all human beings to join the fight to decolonize Islamic lands and to protect the "right" of the ruling Islamic monarchs to their oil wealth.

Article 12 effectively states that all Muslims may travel freely and have the right to assylum, while unbelievers have no such right.

Article 13 effectively makes it compulsory for everyone to work who is able to and to do so primarily for the benefit of society, and provided one does, the state will then keep the employee in "safety and security", while at the same time outlawing business owners from profiting more than the state permits.

Article 14 is an Islamic anti-trust clause which also prohibits one from profiting by lending money to others.

Article 15 effectively legitimizes state expropriation of property.

Article 16 effectively legitimizes Intellectual Property, but limits what it is and how it is to be treated according to Sharia law.

Article 17 effectively socializes healthcare, education and employment.

Article 18 effectively states that one has the right to privacy in one's home.

Article 19 effectively removes limited liability arrangements if they contradict Sharia as well as the possibility of appeal if found guilty in an Islamic court. This article stipulates that there are no other crimes or punishments than those mentioned in the Sharia - e.g. whippings, amputations, stoning and execution.

Article 20 effectively gives all Muslims the right to live anywhere in the world and practice Islam without being interfered with, even if local law contradicts Islamic law.

Article 21 effectively forbids taking Prisoners of War during wartime, thus leaving only the option of killing one's enemies if they do not convert or submit to jizya.

Article 22 effectively bans freedom of speech. This article stipulates that one must not only always speak positively of Islam, but that one is also forbidden to speak in favor of an un-islamic cause.

Article 23 effectively prohibits non-Muslims from taking public office and forbids Muslims to submit to the rule of non-Muslims.

Articles 24 and 25 reaffirm, just in case it was not already clear, that Sharia Law is the only legitimate law and prescribes the only "rights" that any human being can have.

There is little to nothing about what the rights of non-Muslims are in the document.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.