There are currently 1 user and 33 guests online.
Linz's Mario Book—Updated!
Who Should Be the Republican Nominee?
Total votes: 19
Submitted by Landon Erp on Tue, 2006-05-30 21:36
I've noticed with a lot of recent departures there are several groups in need of proper leadership.
I'm wondering if SOLO management (Linz, Jason, Andrew etc...) thinks these positions are still necessary and would like to see them filled with people capable of competently leading discussions, or thinks the forums are just best left alone as is.
I personally think good topical group leaders are a great thing to have because it keeps discussion on different topics fresh and intense, that and people in need of being lead in the right dirrection for further study have a good idea of a single person whom they can direct comments to.
Tongue with Morels? — by Prima Donna on Wed, 2006-05-31 04:24
Regina ... — by Lindsay Perigo on Wed, 2006-05-31 01:47
Fabulous! — by Prima Donna on Wed, 2006-05-31 01:19
Submitted by Rick Giles on Tue, 2006-05-30 11:33
I lived in Avondale when I first moved to Auckland in a place I like to call Home.3 (I'm now live at Home.9 and don't confir this title lightly). It was a huge change for me comming to Auckland with its 1.8 million people from a little place in Canterbury. The whole of the South Island just capped 1 million in the last few months!
Anyway, Avondale is, in being cosmopolitan, one of the very top towns for New Zealand's Pacific Island community (or, "Coconuts" : ). Avondale High is the only school in New Zealand where the lavalava is part of the uniform. One thing I never managed to do was to find an Avondale spider (the giant one on a pole down the main street doesn't count!). This spider is supposed to be endemic to Avondale, it's big and scary looking but completely harmless. They were used as the monster in the film Arachnophobia.
Submitted by Chris Cathcart on Tue, 2006-05-30 04:04
I wasn't sure where else to post theoretical topics other than to the general forum....
I had recently read some reference to a Binswanger lecture, where apparently he defends, in some terms or other, a "dual substance" position as regard mind and body.
I've been going through some thinking now and then on this topic -- how exactly the concept "form" works in an Aristotelian metaphysics. I think the real simple solution to the whole mind-body pseudo-problem is to speak of mind as the form of a certain kind of material entity. I think, ultimately, form pertains to the arrangement that the matter takes on. Aristotelianism proper -- Aristotle's own ideas -- is still too infused with Platonism to make a fully rational understanding of this. I'm sure some hardcore Aristotle scholars could fill us in on this, but as I understand it, form for Aristotle is not to be treated simply as a (product of) specific arrangement of matter. Form can't be actualized except for in a material body, but the manner in which form is united with matter seems Platonic-influenced. It just happens that form -- that "thing" that one could in principle conceive of as existing on its own (and indeed, this comes out in the end with Aristotle's Prime Mover) -- comes in some fashion to meld or merge with matter. Form and matter get treated as two separate ontological categories that, in terms of actual existence (save for the Prime Mover), could only occur together. But they're still two separate ontological categories -- the remnants of Platonism. Is there a cause of form lying only in the particular arrangement of matter? Here Aristotle does some further splitting, with his four-fold theory of cause, conceived as independent but in actuality working together. But yes, it would seem that form is its own cause, independent of matter being arranged in a particular way.
Substance as "independent" — by Boaz the Boor on Tue, 2006-05-30 08:43
Mind as form? — by Boaz the Boor on Tue, 2006-05-30 08:06
form — by Chris Cathcart on Tue, 2006-05-30 06:10
Submitted by George Reisman on Tue, 2006-05-30 04:00
Congressmen no longer read the bills they vote on and thus do not require them to make sense. (The latest example is the passage of a bill by the House of Representatives making “price gouging” illegal while leaving it undefined.) They leave it to the President and the Supreme Court to sort things out.
TJ was right — by Lanza Morio on Sun, 2006-06-04 07:08
A is A — by Craig Ceely on Wed, 2006-05-31 04:25
Ouch — by Lanza Morio on Tue, 2006-05-30 17:27
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 03:03
The internet is a wonderful thing. Not only does it throw up the absurd, the titillating and the combative, lurking within it also are real nuggets of pure genius. This year's BBC Reith Lectures by brilliant conductor Daniel Barenboim is such a nugget.
Craig — by Victor Pross on Fri, 2006-06-16 23:21
From conductor to caterwauler — by Craig Ceely on Fri, 2006-06-16 23:15
Okay, Linz, we'll give you that one... — by Craig Ceely on Fri, 2006-06-16 23:08
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 03:02
Here is some sense. From an academic. I know that's surprising.
See. Good sense. And of course she's right (and have you noticed that a lot of AUT lecturers are not the politically correct line-toers that many of their colleagues over the road are?), and she's backed it up with research:
Every time I hear someone — by wngreen on Wed, 2006-05-31 20:40
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 03:00
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 02:59
PJ O'Rourke points out that when used items have real value -- Ferraris for example -- they don't need to be 'recycled,' they get sold. 'Recycled' is what happens to stuff with no value, or with so little value only a government regulation can make enough people care.
Why is 'recycling' so good? Jerry Taylor from the Cato Institute talks about recycling paper:
Super Fund — by Marnee on Tue, 2006-05-30 19:16
To NZ — by eg on Tue, 2006-05-30 14:46
Next time call them liars — by R.T.Brooke on Tue, 2006-05-30 09:28
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 02:58
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 02:54
'Future generations' are the reason all-too frequently given for conservation and preservation of resources. Indeed, the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment maintains that "conservation of resources for future generations" is explicitly required by the Resource Management Act's core principle of "sustainable management." It is mandatory. It is also stupid. I'll just say two things about both:
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 02:52
I like the statement Ayn — by Victor Pross on Wed, 2006-06-07 05:57
altruism — by Chris Cathcart on Tue, 2006-05-30 05:47
Nice — by Craig Ceely on Tue, 2006-05-30 05:33
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 02:49
The busybody nostrums of town planners are slowly being seen for what they are: restrictions on people's lives; an insistence that people live as planners wish them to, rather than as they might choose for themselves -- and the planners' restrictions are adding enormous extra costs to housing. Two recent articles confirm that view, one from San Francisco and one from Boulder, Colorado.
Boulder has been described as "twenty-five square miles surrounded by reality." Boulder's town planning regime seems to confirm that view, says the Thoreau Institute's Randal O'Toole, who notes that a whopping ninety-percent of American housing markets are less expensive than Boulder.
Why? "Restrictive land-use planning has driven up housing prices in Boulder...
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 02:49
The case of Hirsi Ali highlights again the great immigration debate, and on that subject Harry Binswanger cuts to the chase once again. You want a solution to the 'problem of illegal immigration? Here it is:
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 02:43
New York — by Peri Sword on Sat, 2006-06-03 18:40
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 02:39
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 02:37
A brief word on the issue of Mark Inglis, his heroic climb and the tragic death of David Sharp. Many people including Everest conqueror Sir Ed Hillary have questioned the morality of Mark Inglis walking past the dying David Sharp. Many details have emerged of what happened up 8000m up in the death zone -- a place so inhospitable to human life that at times just surviving is all you can do -- including the news that Inglis's own sherpas did investigate David Sharp and concluded no help was possible to him.
I personally haven't heard — by JoeM on Thu, 2006-06-01 23:34
News in the US? — by Peter Cresswell on Thu, 2006-06-01 22:44
Another relevant quote from — by JoeM on Wed, 2006-05-31 23:57
Submitted by Prima Donna on Mon, 2006-05-29 15:14
I was astonished to discover that many people are unaware of the meaning of Memorial Day in the United States -- they see this simply as a day off to barbecue and relax in the sunshine.
While it is most certainly an opportunity to that (and I emphatically support it), it is also a day to remember those who have given their lives to uphold freedom and liberty in the United States. Every soldier who has fallen on a battlefield has enabled me to savor the freedom inherent in all the activities I will enjoy today, and I wanted to publicly say thanks for that. I've also posted a note on my Gilded Fork blog:
Band of Brothers — by User hidden on Tue, 2006-06-27 04:16
Not so fast — by bobkolker on Fri, 2006-06-02 20:09
Kolker: "The error in both — by wngreen on Fri, 2006-06-02 17:46
Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Mon, 2006-05-29 09:33
Sent to me via e-mail, citing you on the TOC Frord Board:
"And oh, yes, another embarrassing secret - how many paid subscribers does The Free Radical have? Answer: A hundred and eighty.
Phil ... — by Lindsay Perigo on Tue, 2006-05-30 00:29
Too Short to Be Crystal Clear — by PhilipC on Mon, 2006-05-29 17:06
Endlessly Wrapping...Lines — by PhilipC on Mon, 2006-05-29 16:39
Submitted by Casey on Mon, 2006-05-29 06:26
OK, I think it's time we clear up this issue once and for all for those who seem to misunderstand Rand's philosophy as a whole in their otherwise inexplicable misunderstanding of Rand's view of moral perfection (e.g. Robert Campbell, post 77 on the PARC thread at RoR. Sorry to reference that site, but it's for a good cause, Linz).
What Is Moral Perfection in Objectivism? — by bobkolker on Wed, 2006-06-07 13:51
Linz, I like what you said — by Lanza Morio on Wed, 2006-06-07 09:34
There is a great difference — by Lanza Morio on Wed, 2006-06-07 09:24
Submitted by Amy Lauren on Mon, 2006-05-29 05:59
I'm new to Objectivism, but I was shown this article on another forum, and I'm wondering if you all have seen this:
Well, hi, Amy, welcome to — by Ross Elliot on Mon, 2006-05-29 06:20
Hi Amy — by Lanza Morio on Mon, 2006-05-29 06:19
Submitted by Chris Cathcart on Mon, 2006-05-29 05:30
If I may pose this as a valid distinction rather than a false dichotomy, I was just looking at the Thrust thread about Keira Knightley and Scarlett Johannson on the cover, and came to the sudden realization that while all of Keira's physical features may not come out to a "10" (she is very much on the, um, "slender" side, very Ally McBeal-like), in terms of pure aesthetics her face is about as beautiful as they come amongst celebrities. Angelina Jolie, OTOH, would fall into the "hot" category; her face and her entire physicality are more openly inviting to sex. (Another sudden realization, see.) So where am I going with this? I haven't the faintest. Other than, it seems that there are women who can invite more of a pure aesthetic response, and others who invite the boner response.
It's mostly about — by AShortt on Thu, 2009-01-29 19:25
"In my twenties I once or — by 0 on Mon, 2008-10-13 20:28
Aesthetics and Sex — by Newberry on Wed, 2008-07-16 19:53
Submitted by Mike_M on Mon, 2006-05-29 03:17
Here is a list of upcomming State of ARI talks.
You guys ... — by Lindsay Perigo on Thu, 2006-06-15 08:48
Another TOC title — by Kenny on Thu, 2006-06-15 08:28
Atlas Hugged — by DianaHsieh on Thu, 2006-06-15 01:41
Submitted by Duncan Bayne on Sun, 2006-05-28 23:55
And if that wasn't enough ... 25% of the profit from the sale of these shirts will be donated to SOLO. So now you've no excuse not to buy one
Yes Chris, Exactly — by Ted Keer on Thu, 2009-01-01 04:31
A Craven Act of Surrender? — by Ted Keer on Wed, 2006-09-27 16:38
Isn't it the whole idea of — by Chris Cathcart on Wed, 2006-09-27 05:24
Submitted by Landon Erp on Sun, 2006-05-28 21:56
It's just really starting to come to my attention that there are a lot of people who don't know who Steve Ditko is. I know most people here are at least mildly aware of him but I still don't think he has the recognition he deserves (especially among Objectivists).
This guy had a major impact on my life and I think for that. I owe him a debt I may never be able to pay completely. This writing is part of my payment.
Now that is an interesting — by Landon Erp on Sun, 2006-06-11 19:48
Who really wrote Blue Beetle #2? — by Bob Palin on Sun, 2006-06-11 18:33
Yes! — by Bob Palin on Wed, 2006-05-31 01:45
Submitted by User hidden on Sun, 2006-05-28 19:17
Isn't there a singles board or something? I wanna start looking for the man or woman of my dreams!
P.S. The description of this board says that attention-seekers don't belong. Jennifer and I may have to start our own little banter board if that is really the case.
> I spent this past weekend — by PhilipC on Thu, 2006-06-01 00:14
72 hours?! Do I have to — by User hidden on Wed, 2006-05-31 04:04
Good choice! — by Prima Donna on Wed, 2006-05-31 01:47
Submitted by User hidden on Sun, 2006-05-28 19:10
I don't know how many lesbians or bi women there are here, but I need some advice from the one's who are. I am recently separated after 6 years of marriage to a man. I haven't been with a woman in a long freakin time, and I want to BAD! I have been to the only true lesbian bar here in Atlanta, and what I found was kind of discouraging. The women who hit on me were all way too butch for my taste. The women I was attracted to (the curvy, feminine ones) all seemed to be into very butch women. Now, I'm no delicate flower, but I have boobs and hips and long hair. I love to wear makeup and go shopping, and the like. Is the lesbian community everywhere so divided down gender role lines? What do I do to find lipstick lesbians who want lipstick lesbians? Are bi-curious girls my only choice (I do meet them in bars sometimes)? I really would like someone who was into women, not just into trying it out once or twice. What is your advice?
Dating Online — by Ashley on Fri, 2006-06-02 04:53
Maybe bad luck? — by User hidden on Thu, 2006-06-01 19:46
Online dating — by Prima Donna on Thu, 2006-06-01 02:47
Submitted by User hidden on Sun, 2006-05-28 18:54
I wish I was writing about a sordid affair I was having here in Atlanta. But instead, I am going to say my piece about the Brandens, PARC, Linz, ARI, and all that jazz. Linz asked me to post something, and I will, mostly because I want to praise him a lot. He deserves it.
First, let me say, I was never taken in by Nathaniel Branden. His website and the hatefulness of his "memoirs" (Can they be called that when you make them up?) were enough to show me what an ungrateful distorter of a philosophy he must have understood at one time he is. Barbara on the other hand had me fooled. I saw from her posts on the old SOLO that she wasn't really an Objectivist. (I am one of those who thinks that that word has real referents in reality.) But aside from that, she seemed a nice old lady to me. I admired her book, and I enjoyed her comments by and large.
Victor — by James S. Valliant on Sun, 2006-06-04 19:17
Brendan, — by Casey on Thu, 2006-06-01 16:06
Coincidence? think not. — by Brendan Hutching on Thu, 2006-06-01 08:50
Submitted by eg on Sun, 2006-05-28 18:28
Barbara Branden in Objectivist Living reaffirms her oft stated conviction that it was legitimate to speculate on Ayn Rand's psychology in her biography.
Brant ... — by Lindsay Perigo on Mon, 2006-05-29 10:29
"I know on the basis of — by jriggenbach on Sun, 2006-05-28 19:06
Submitted by User hidden on Sun, 2006-05-28 04:50
Hello all you KASS Soloites. For those of you who remember me (you all better), I'm Kelly and I'm back! A few things have happened lately - David and I separated (but are still good friends), I have a new job as a preschool gymnastics coach and as a server at a sports bar, and I have a new apartment in Atlanta. I can't wait to see what all is going on here at SOLO now.
P.S. Jennifer, after we talked on the phone, I just couldn't stay away!
Hey, Aaron babe. OPAR at my — by User hidden on Wed, 2006-05-31 04:02
Greetings — by Aaron on Wed, 2006-05-31 02:48
! — by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-30 21:23
Submitted by JoeM on Sun, 2006-05-28 00:59
I don't know if this was common in journalism throughout the last dozen years, but I had to chuckle a little in rereading this seen from the FOUNTAINHEAD in light of Geraldo Rivera and Anderson Cooper's actions during the Katrina debacle:
"The Banner was alwasy first with the news. When an earthquake occurred in South America and no communications came from the stricken area, Wynand chartered a liner, sent a crew down to the scene and had extras on the streets of New York days ahead of his competitors...When an S.O.S.
Thanks Malcom, I thought — by Landon Erp on Mon, 2006-05-29 01:26
Hearst — by Robert Malcom on Mon, 2006-05-29 01:23
From what I heard. — by Landon Erp on Sun, 2006-05-28 04:09
More SOLO Store
The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand
Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand