There are currently 0 users and 32 guests online.
Linz's New Book
Is Edward Snowden a hero?
Hell yes! His actions were moral.
Hell no! Put him away for treason.
Yes and no. It's a grey area.
Other (please specify)
Total votes: 23
Submitted by George Reisman on Thu, 2006-04-20 20:50
This is a question that no one seems to be asking. And so I’ve asked it. And here, in essence, is what I think is the answer. (The answer, of course, applies to Ford and Chrysler, as well as to General Motors. I’ve singled out General Motors because it’s still the largest of the three and its problems are the most pronounced.)
1. The company would be without so-called Monday-morning automobiles. That is, automobiles poorly made for no other reason than because they happened to be made on a day when too few workers showed up, or too few showed up sober, to do the jobs they were paid to do. Without the UAW, General Motors would simply have fired such workers and replaced them with ones who would do the jobs they were paid to do. And so, without the UAW, GM would have produced more reliable, higher quality cars, had a better reputation for quality, and correspondingly greater sales volume to go with it. Why didn’t they do this? Because with the UAW, such action by GM would merely have provoked work stoppages and strikes, with no prospect that the UAW would be displaced or that anything would be better after the strikes. Federal Law, specifically, The National Labor Relations Act of 1935, long ago made it illegal for companies simply to get rid of unions.
Excellent news Bill. It — by Jason Quintana on Fri, 2006-04-21 17:31
Rush reads Reisman — by nevin on Fri, 2006-04-21 17:18
"It is hard to get sympathy — by Jason Quintana on Thu, 2006-04-20 23:49
Submitted by JoeM on Thu, 2006-04-20 00:36
deleted by author
I agree that "Mars" is not — by JoeM on Tue, 2006-05-02 00:04
Wonder how Rand would classify 'Hip-Hop's — by Landon Erp on Mon, 2006-05-01 23:57
Musical 'Anger' ya want? Try 'DOOM' (not the movie) — by Rowlf on Mon, 2006-05-01 03:29
Submitted by JoeM on Wed, 2006-04-19 23:59
In the "Bootleg Romanticism" chapter of THE ROMANTIC MANIFESTO, Ayn Rand writes:
Very astute — by Landon Erp on Thu, 2006-04-20 21:31
I am a fan of well done — by John M Newnham on Thu, 2006-04-20 14:12
William, the first reference — by JoeM on Thu, 2006-04-20 04:59
Submitted by PhilipC on Wed, 2006-04-19 20:59
The question was raised (on a thread about JARS, and in many other places on many occasions) whether Peikoff in "The Ominous Parallels", Rand in "For the New Intellectual", and Objectivist intellectuals oversimplify the history of ideas, oversimplify Kant in terms of his central ideas or his influence, etc. Or are they essentializing and stripping away side issues in seeing the main lines of philosophical development and philosophy as the motive power behind all history?
I will start out by contesting a point Jeff Riggenbach just raised on another thread:
> Denying that we can "have knowledge of the thing in itself" is NOT the same thing as denying that "we can get to reality." Right there is the main locus of the absurd Objectivist oversimplification of Kant. [Jeff]
Inscrutable motives and Kant's style — by Robert Campbell on Sat, 2006-04-22 18:48
Kant exegesis vs. Kant defense — by Chris Cathcart on Sat, 2006-04-22 18:38
Chris — by Fred Weiss on Sat, 2006-04-22 14:25
Submitted by Dan Edge on Wed, 2006-04-19 01:10
I just applied to the Objectivist Academic Center for the Fall semester. I take their online essay test on Wednesday, so wish me luck! Hopefully I will not be automatically disqualified for associating with people like you
Congratulations! — by Martin on Mon, 2006-10-02 12:01
Reassuring ... — by Lindsay Perigo on Sun, 2006-10-01 22:46
Yeah . . . — by User hidden on Sun, 2006-10-01 20:44
Submitted by Joe Idoni on Wed, 2006-04-19 00:42
This is posted in the links section of TOC's website.
SOLOPassion -- The other part of the former SOLOHQ, run by Lindsay Perigo. Not friendly to The Atlas Society/Objectivist Center, but they still link to us.
For a group who has taken the liberal face of Objectivism, is this really appropriate?
Ergh — by Joe Idoni on Sun, 2006-05-07 23:26
Joe ... — by Lindsay Perigo on Wed, 2006-04-19 01:03
Old news. — by Landon Erp on Wed, 2006-04-19 00:45
Submitted by AdamReed on Tue, 2006-04-18 16:07
The late Jack Anderson "wrote about Watergate, CIA assassination schemes, and countless scandals. ... His archive, some 200 boxes now being held by George Washington University's library, could be a trove of information about state secrets, dirty dealings, political maneuverings, and old-fashioned investigative journalism, open for historians and up-and-coming reporters to see. But the government wants to see the documents before anyone else. Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation have told university officials and members of the Anderson family that they want to go through the archive, and that agents will remove any item they deem confidential or top secret." Chronicle of Higher Education.
Are you saying that only if — by Charles Henrikson on Tue, 2006-04-25 17:19
Knowledge of facts cannot be owned — by AdamReed on Sat, 2006-04-22 07:01
re:"Not Intelectual Property" — by Charles Henrikson on Fri, 2006-04-21 22:53
Submitted by Duncan Bayne on Mon, 2006-04-17 20:36
A while back, I wrote a letter containing the following:
I was firmly convinced that the more that non-Muslims actually find out about Islam, the less they'll be inclined to believe that it's a religion of peace at it's core. It turns out that I was absolutely right:
My experience has been that — by Richard Wiig on Thu, 2006-04-20 23:26
No. At least in New — by Duncan Bayne on Thu, 2006-04-20 21:09
Did he? — by Richard Wiig on Thu, 2006-04-20 06:40
Submitted by Lanza Morio on Mon, 2006-04-17 07:47
Name that novel:
Among many morals which press upon us from the poor minister's miserable experience, we put only this into a sentence: "Be true! Be true! Be true! Show freely to the world, if not your worst, yet some trait whereby the worst may be inferred!"
Re: "The Scarlet Letter" — by mcohen on Tue, 2006-04-18 02:43
We have a winner! Michelle, — by Lanza Morio on Mon, 2006-04-17 17:20
Re: Name that novel — by mcohen on Mon, 2006-04-17 15:05
Submitted by Rick Giles on Mon, 2006-04-17 01:51
Grief is the price we pay for love
I don't agree.
Grief is the price we pay for love lost. If love lost is the same as love then all love must fail.
That was pretty clever — by Rick Giles on Sat, 2006-04-22 23:46
I don't even know — by Richard Wiig on Sat, 2006-04-22 13:16
You just don't have a very — by Rick Giles on Sat, 2006-04-22 13:01
Submitted by Duncan Bayne on Mon, 2006-04-17 00:11
I've been reading a bit about polyphasic sleep recently, trying to get a feel for whether it'd fit my working style and hobbies.
My wife and I considered — by Duncan Bayne on Tue, 2006-04-18 20:56
I'll Sleep When I'm Dead — by Ashley on Tue, 2006-04-18 20:12
Hmmm — by Andrew Bissell on Mon, 2006-04-17 08:16
Submitted by Jason Quintana on Sun, 2006-04-16 21:55
This week I am recommending recordings for the symphonies of two outstanding late 19th century composers. Two of the great creators of melody and orchestration, Antonin Dvorak a Czech and Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky a Russian composed some of the most beautiful music ever written. I consider all of the symphonies of Tchaikovsky to be masterpieces. Dvorak's great works for this genre were his final three symphonies.
Bernstein NY Philharmonic version — by wngreen on Sun, 2006-04-23 02:43
Robert — by Jason Quintana on Fri, 2006-04-21 21:32
Personal Preferences - — by Robert Malcom on Fri, 2006-04-21 20:26
Submitted by Marcus on Sun, 2006-04-16 20:57
Interesting article from the New Scientist concerning concept formation and reasoning from the ground up.
Namely, how do you teach a computer common sense?
Submitted by Jason Quintana on Sun, 2006-04-16 14:56
I am very excited to announce that we have a new SOLO co-webmaster to replace the excellent Duncan Bayne who is stepping down next month to pursue a business venture.
This new webmaster is... Ross Elliot! Ross is an experienced programmer and a long time member of SOLO. I am extremely pleased that he has accepted my offer and I'm looking forward to seeing the improvements that he and Julian will make to the website during the next several months.
My understanding ... — by Lindsay Perigo on Wed, 2006-04-19 07:29
You sure are, Ash. By the — by Ross Elliot on Wed, 2006-04-19 04:30
I Should Be — by Ashley on Tue, 2006-04-18 20:14
Submitted by AdamReed on Sun, 2006-04-16 07:36
"On December 1st, Merck & Company applied to the Food and Drug Administration for a license to sell a vaccine that it has developed to protect women against the human papilloma virus. ... More than twelve thousand women between the ages of sixteen and twenty-six were monitored for an average of two years. The results were conclusive: twenty-one of the women who received a placebo during the trial developed the cellular abnormalities that are associated with cancer and other illnesses. Not one of those in the vaccinated group did. Another vaccine, which is being developed by GlaxoSmithKline, promises to be just as effective."
christianism — by Rex Wilkinson on Sun, 2006-06-04 22:29
Well said — by Kenny on Mon, 2006-04-17 13:22
Submitted by Rick Giles on Sun, 2006-04-16 02:28
T'is an ill wind that blows nobody any good! Allow me to demonstrate.
The Silver Lining # 1:
Lindsay Mitchell blogged on Saturday of the English police emergency that had a Herefordshire shopkeeper rush to the crime scene, his shop, in a bluster. Turned out they wanted to impound three gollywog dolls in the shop window!
That's nothing — by Kenny on Sun, 2006-04-16 13:51
Submitted by seddon on Sun, 2006-04-16 00:50
T. S. Eliot said that “April is the cruellest month,” but since it is the month when I celebrate the birth of Rachmaninoff, I think It is just fine. So I thought I would put down a few thoughts about SR.
Naxos — by Kenny on Mon, 2006-04-17 16:53
RCA/Naxos — by Kenny on Mon, 2006-04-17 11:30
Linz, — by seddon on Mon, 2006-04-17 00:57
Submitted by Tim S on Fri, 2006-04-14 15:03
I'm always incredulous at the things people say against their own culture. Everywhere one goes one encounters hatred towards George Bush, the US, Tony Blair and pretty much everything that is making an attempt to stand up for justice in the face of Islamo-fascism. And yet while George Bush is hated and equated with Hitler, I rarely hear anyone express anger towards Bin Laden, Saddam, Islamic beheaders, or any other mass murdererer - in fact the very sort of people who are actually threatening our lives right now.
What the fuck is wrong with people?
Kenny, have a read of this. — by Duncan Bayne on Tue, 2006-04-18 05:02
Time To Fight The Real War — by Sandi on Tue, 2006-04-18 01:37
That's all? — by Rick Giles on Mon, 2006-04-17 23:24
Submitted by Tenyamc on Fri, 2006-04-14 06:58
When you're expecting your first baby, you can find numerous books that include directions for bathing your new baby. New parent classes usually devote at least one session to bathing the new baby. Finally, if you feel the need for some last-minute instruction, most hospitals have videos and nurses available to advise new parents on this and many other aspects of newborn care. What these many guides fail to make adequately clear is that wet babies are very slippery, once soap is added, they are even slipperier. Further when you bathe a real live baby, you get very wet. If you bathe your child in the bathtub, it hurts your back. Added to these complications, many very young babies become frightened when placed in a tub of water.
Everyday-ness — by VSD on Sun, 2006-04-16 21:06
Love the sink! — by Prima Donna on Sun, 2006-04-16 03:45
Kitchen sink — by Tenyamc on Sat, 2006-04-15 21:14
Submitted by Dan Edge on Fri, 2006-04-14 04:02
This essay is a discussion of the Correspondence Theory of Truth (CTOT) and how the theory fits into the philosophy of Objectivism. I will argue that properly understood, the CTOT is compatible with Objectivist epistemology. I will also discuss pitfalls that must be avoided to keep the door closed to skepticism.
Readers should note that I am writing here for two distinct audiences. The first is the Objectivist community at large, those who are already familiar with the philosophy. I am also presenting this essay to my Senior Seminar in Philosophy class at the University of South Carolina for peer review.
I prefer 'aspects of existents' — by Ed on Tue, 2006-04-25 05:03
Thanks Ed — by Dan Edge on Mon, 2006-04-24 20:36
terminology — by Rowlf on Fri, 2006-04-21 06:04
Submitted by George Reisman on Thu, 2006-04-13 21:33
Few issues are more frequently commented on than the shifting of American manufacturing to locations outsides the United States, in order to take advantage of lower foreign wage rates, particularly in Asia. This shifting is what is meant by “offshoring.” With equal or greater frequency lamentations are heard concerning the United States’ chronic excess of imports over exports, i.e., its so-called “unfavorable” balance of trade.
Here’s an example that will help to put both matters in proper perspective.
Outsourcing versus Exile — by Ted Keer on Fri, 2007-01-26 04:11
Offshoring — by 0 on Thu, 2007-01-25 22:28
Just a smidge above slaves — by Fraser Stephen-Smith on Wed, 2006-04-19 16:22
Submitted by JoeM on Thu, 2006-04-13 18:30
Well known is the story of Ayn Rand's appearance on Donahue, as told by Barbara Branden. The story is used as evidence of Rand's intolerance and dogmatic insistence on agreement. Anyone who has actually seen the footage knows that this story is a lie.
Ted, you're a moron. Ooops, — by Fred Weiss on Thu, 2006-11-23 22:06
QED — by Ted Keer on Thu, 2006-11-23 21:33
Fred and Ted — by Fred Weiss on Thu, 2006-11-23 21:23
Submitted by Andrew Bissell on Thu, 2006-04-13 18:27
Here's a press release I sent out to some local papers today about an event the UM Objectivist Club will be holding tomorrow:
April 13, 2006
UM Objectivist Club to display Muhammad cartoons at UM, raise money for
Good job, Andrew. — by JoeM on Sun, 2006-04-16 23:02
same — by Mike_M on Sun, 2006-04-16 22:11
Wow — by Andrew Bissell on Sun, 2006-04-16 21:24
Submitted by Rick Giles on Thu, 2006-04-13 11:41
My respect for religion is like my admiration for a well-made steam engine. It's great what it can do, we're more powerful with it than with nothing in its place BUT it has been supplanted and the new way is better. But Julian comes back with...
Submitted by jtgagnon on Thu, 2006-04-13 03:27
Whatever one's views on the use of anticipatory self-defense against Iran, it is becoming increasingly clear (but apparently not to all) that action MUST be taken. President Bush once referred to Ahmadinejad as an "odd guy." That is an understatement on every level. Ensconced on the throne of Islam's shining star, Ahmadinejad's rhetoric is not merely inflammatory - he's backing it up with actions. He is, simply put, a fanatacist - a member of an obscure Shi'ite sect that eagerly awaits Armageddon and the appearance of the 12th Imam. Fueled by such irrational beliefs, this "odd guy" will employ whatever methods necessary to legitimize his utterly absurd beliefs.
Not a clue... — by jtgagnon on Wed, 2006-04-19 05:28
I've just realised that this — by Duncan Bayne on Wed, 2006-04-19 04:29
Kenny, if you were to apply — by Duncan Bayne on Tue, 2006-04-18 23:52
Submitted by Dan Edge on Wed, 2006-04-12 21:08
This blog entry is a review of Robert Campbell's essay Ayn Rand and the Cognitive Revolution in Psychology. Mr. Campbell provided a link to this essay in another thread, encouraging review.
You can call me Dr. Cohen... — by mcohen on Sun, 2006-04-16 17:21
Re: Cognitive Poetics — by mcohen on Sun, 2006-04-16 12:51
Cognitive poetics — by Robert Campbell on Sun, 2006-04-16 03:03
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Wed, 2006-04-12 20:30
A new Muslim-sensitive edition of Playboy has appeared in the world's most populous Muslim nation that should please all the local and international idiots who favour wowserish puritanism for Muslim women -- the just-launched Indonesian edition lifts the burqah on "midriffs, thighs and cleavage," but contains no nudity. None at all. I swear I am not making this up.
Who ripped the pics out, dammit? — by Rowlf on Fri, 2006-04-14 06:15
Grizzlies — by Rick Giles on Thu, 2006-04-13 10:11
*I'm* not grizzling about — by Ross Elliot on Thu, 2006-04-13 02:35
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Wed, 2006-04-12 20:28
Let me introduce you to a film in which the contradictions are apparently all worth it.
A teen-flick that celebrates intelligence.
Thrilling stuff, huh? Sounds like it to me too, and I know nothing more about it than what I've read here, and that it's called Cellular.
LINK: The digital divide: It's not the money stupid - Owen McShane, NBR
Life is 'cellular' nowadays...dude — by Rowlf on Sat, 2006-04-15 04:46
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Wed, 2006-04-12 20:26
Every year at Easter we celebrate sacrifice with time-honoured rituals that go to the heart of who we are as a society. This year will be no exception.
mmmm...sacrilicious.... — by JoeM on Sun, 2006-04-16 14:32
Closed — by Kenny on Sun, 2006-04-16 13:44
Shop Trading Restrictions are a Human Rights Issue — by Sandi on Fri, 2006-04-14 01:11
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Wed, 2006-04-12 20:18
'The Government that Governs Best, Governs Least.' That's true, but it's not the whole truth -- which just shows you how reliable bumper-sticker philosophy can be. What's missing from that analysis is what gets too many libertarians confused.
Size is important — by Kenny on Thu, 2006-04-13 13:48
More SOLO Store
The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand
Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand