There are currently 0 users and 26 guests online.
Linz's Mario Book—Updated!
Who Should Be the Republican Nominee?
Total votes: 14
Submitted by Rex Wilkinson on Tue, 2006-05-16 19:11
Well that to me is a very long way round saying that you are a believer and would like to create the illusion that you can be a believer and an intellectual to.I believe it was kepler who tried to marry the maths the physics and god all in the one.he never made sense of it and eventualy gave it up.Rather than try and create the idea that god can exist in the modern world why not accept that there
Atheism is a step in the right direction — by Landon Erp on Sun, 2006-06-04 21:35
Rex, you're an interesting — by Victor Pross on Sun, 2006-06-04 21:23
A negative — by Rex Wilkinson on Sun, 2006-06-04 07:03
Submitted by Wes on Tue, 2006-05-16 15:18
If you're under 35, and weren't raised by the Amish, you'll enjoy Robot Chicken.
Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Mon, 2006-05-15 12:10
Diana, who has a stronger stomach than I, sometimes lurks on hostile territory, whence she has sent me this post by TOC Executive Director Ed Hudgins:
US allies, allies of us, Objectivist allies — by William Scott Scherk on Tue, 2007-07-17 04:03
Answering Fred's comments on Lincoln's inaugural — by William Scott Scherk on Sun, 2007-05-27 23:50
This came up ... — by Lindsay Perigo on Fri, 2006-11-10 07:42
Submitted by George Reisman on Mon, 2006-05-15 10:20
In today’s New York Times, Robert H. Frank, who is described as “the co-author, with Ben S. Bernanke, of `Principles of Economics,’” writes that Galbraith should have won the Nobel Prize—for the ideas expressed in the The Affluent Society.
In case anyone needs a refresher about Galbraith, and the fascistic nature of his ideas, be sure to see my "Galbraith's Neo-Feudalism," which recently appeared on my blog.
I had no idea — by Pete L on Tue, 2006-05-16 01:36
Submitted by VSD on Sun, 2006-05-14 20:32
As promised I'll cross-post this to Solo Parenting as I think it is not so much a problem of the bogey-man or the fear of god, but the way we control the minds of our children through fear and submission - which btw. works both ways: for the rationalists and the believers - the crucial point is to let the children decide instead of controlling their minds to get the desired results: fearful, stunted children ...
Submitted by Rick Giles on Sun, 2006-05-14 03:52
A lobbyist is an animal with pull on his mind,
Submitted by Chris Cathcart on Sun, 2006-05-14 03:29
Maybe this has been discussed to death already, but I was wondering how those making the case against the Brandens (led by Valliant's PARC) viewed the portrayal of Rand in their final meeting together in Barbara's PAR -- the one in 1981. Is it the view of those critics of the Brandens that Barbara doesn't have enough credibility to make this account believable (that they had a meeting at all, much less a reasonably happy one), or is it granted as one of those times that Miss Rand is shown in a very positive light? Rand is portrayed as a very warm person, warm enough to put aside past differences enough to the extent of spending a pleasant day together. I'm also thinking of the account provided by Devers Branden in her meeting with Rand -- that Rand, instead of angrily turning Devers away at the door, was trusting enough to eventually invite her in and have a civil conversation.
Probably Amazon. — by Casey on Thu, 2006-05-18 05:28
Not yet. — by Olivia on Thu, 2006-05-18 05:01
Claudia, — by Casey on Thu, 2006-05-18 04:53
Submitted by JoeM on Sat, 2006-05-13 02:37
From Wikipedia, a list of popular songs from the past century that incorporate classical compositions.
(1891) "O Promise Me" by Reginald DeKoven & Smith, from the musical Robin Hood -- based on Musica proibita, the name popularly given to an aria in the 1888 Italian opera Mala Pasqua by Stanislo Gastaldon.
(1913) "Hungarian Rag" by Julius Lenzberg - based on the Second Hungarian Rhapsody by Franz Liszt.
very useful. — by waynesl on Thu, 2009-09-24 15:49
Yeah good post !!!!I feel — by Irving on Tue, 2009-08-04 11:11
Ahh..this is the theme I had — by Rick Giles on Mon, 2007-05-07 06:40
Submitted by Chris Cathcart on Sat, 2006-05-13 00:19
This ties into a couple recent SOLO blog posts, one titled The proof there is no god and another on Spinoza on Freedom, Ethics, and Politics. The thoughts here are those occurring to me as I've been recently coming down quite hard on Kant's metaphysics on HPO. I won't speak to the apparent naturalistic pantheism of Spinoza; rather, I'm concerned here with a non-naturalist, transcendent God, the kind which Kant held out a metaphysical possibility for.
>>"How would that [the idea — by Utility Belt on Sat, 2006-05-13 21:13
Probability — by Chris Cathcart on Sat, 2006-05-13 21:03
Metaphysics — by Rex Wilkinson on Sat, 2006-05-13 20:50
Submitted by Rex Wilkinson on Fri, 2006-05-12 16:22
I believe the proof is all around us.Our history is full of proof there is no god and no proof there is.How long can we never find god for,before we have to conclude that there is nothing to find.Every test we want to perform will have the same result ,no god appeared,no god appeared and never has.There have been a few claims of seeing god but people claim some amazing things and one individuals a
OK there seems to be some — by michael fasher on Sat, 2007-04-28 23:46
my 10 cents worth — by 0 on Sat, 2007-04-28 12:37
You can't deny that which you cannot discern — by Ed on Thu, 2006-05-18 07:01
Submitted by Jason Quintana on Fri, 2006-05-12 16:19
Ok guys -- I am off to Shanghai. I will be back in two weeks. Everyone behave while I'm gone.
Snap off a big one, Jase! — by Ross Elliot on Fri, 2006-05-12 23:44
Submitted by younkins on Fri, 2006-05-12 14:22
If one mentions the name Spinoza, he is likely to get a response something like “Oh, wasn’t he the pantheist philosopher who lived around the time of Hobbes and Locke?” Of course, he was but he was also much more than that. Baruch (Benedict de) Spinoza (1632-1677) promulgated a deductive, rational and monist philosophy that exhibited a mathematical appreciation of the universe and that held that things can only be understood when viewed in relation to a total structure. Spinoza’s thought is still extremely relevant to 21st Century thinkers in areas such as methodological individualism, value theory, ethical naturalism, self-perfectionism, and political philosophy. For example, many of Spinoza’s ideas are reflected in the works of contemporary philosophers such as Douglas Den Uyl, Douglas Rasmussen, and Tibor Machan.
Thanks — by Peter Cresswell on Sun, 2006-05-21 03:14
Comments on interview with author of book on Spinoza — by mcohen on Fri, 2006-05-19 15:04
Aquinas and Spinoza — by mcohen on Wed, 2006-05-17 03:18
Submitted by wsscherk on Fri, 2006-05-12 14:06
Oops, don't have one, just a musing, and a mental image of kittens (chatons, Fr., kittens):
-- doesn't it seem to some of you, oh chin-on-fist, palm-on-mouse, angina-tablets-at-hand readers who have yet to post, that the chatbox is a different form of forum? a more kittenish place, as opposed to the "Gladiators and the Lions" main SOLO battle arenas?
No, I won't, Will, and it is — by JoeM on Sat, 2006-05-13 14:23
"I met Chris Sciabarra" — by wsscherk on Sat, 2006-05-13 07:56
"ps did it strike you at all — by JoeM on Sat, 2006-05-13 00:25
Submitted by Marcus on Thu, 2006-05-11 22:45
Article about Science in NZ from the New Scientist.
There is a side-splitting part about flatulence research.
Under the heading, "Belching Cattle".
"EIGHTY million cows, sheep and deer burp their way into a major methane headache for New Zealand, which has the unique distinction among developed nations of having methane as its major greenhouse gas. About 90 per cent of the country's methane emissions come from ruminant belches.
Ha. — by Olivia on Mon, 2006-05-15 21:45
Still? — by Marcus on Mon, 2006-05-15 16:51
Hokey ole NZ — by Olivia on Sun, 2006-05-14 23:42
Submitted by Julian Pistorius on Thu, 2006-05-11 20:19
There are some brilliant insights in the discussion of the first chapter. Thank you guys! Especially to Marcus - very inspirational - even though you cheated and skipped to chapter 2.
Right, let's all move on to chapter 2 then.
Would anybody like to lead the discussion?
I have a question to start it off. Ayn Rand wrote that you can improve your Sense of Life (SOL). How would you kick-start this process? Once you have this bad SOL, any exposure to great and uplifting art would not have the same wholesome effect, or would it? You would prefer the unclear, the murky, the dark, surely?
Yikes. — by Prima Donna on Mon, 2006-05-29 13:46
"I'm just glad I picked up — by JoeM on Sun, 2006-05-28 02:11
Linz: Except I know damn — by wngreen on Sun, 2006-05-28 01:43
Submitted by jtgagnon on Thu, 2006-05-11 19:44
Lest you think my previous rants about Iran were without substance or support, I urge you to read and consider the following editorial. That we continue to follow a policy of inaction with Iran is not only despicable - it reveals that America has become a spineless giant, a shadow of its former self...and this is a fact that should worry all individuals who value freedom.
NEW YORK SUN | Editorial
Iran declares war — by Sandi on Sat, 2006-05-27 02:07
Indeed — by jtgagnon on Sat, 2006-05-20 04:00
Islam at war — by Rex Wilkinson on Mon, 2006-05-15 05:51
Submitted by RicoSuave on Thu, 2006-05-11 18:47
Dr. Edward W. Younkins and Michael Novak are both well educated in philosophy and economics. They seem to have similar conclusions, but adopt different methods or premises to reach a free society. The biggest of these differences would lie in whether or not faith should be foundational to our political and economic system. For one to compare these insightful men, one must consider their writings, their influences and whom they influence in turn.
Submitted by Casey on Thu, 2006-05-11 10:14
So I was scanning SOLO for the latest and as the television is on in the background I suddenly hear the sultry voice of Prima Donna and look up and there she is on television in a long commercial talking about the Gilded Fork! I can't even remember which web service it was advertising -- the commercial was all about Jennifer and her new food philosophy business! I kid you not. What a strange experience.
And if you're ever in Indiana... — by Landon Erp on Mon, 2006-05-15 02:30
Well... — by Prima Donna on Mon, 2006-05-15 02:25
hmm.. — by Adam Buker on Sun, 2006-05-14 08:20
Submitted by George Reisman on Thu, 2006-05-11 05:11
Does gasoline at 10 cents a gallon and falling sound impossible in today’s world?
Well, if you think it’s impossible, you’re wrong. Because that’s where gasoline actually is, and it looks like it’s going even lower.
risk premiums? — by Chris Cathcart on Thu, 2006-05-11 15:10
Supply and Demand — by Jason Quintana on Thu, 2006-05-11 14:00
General inflation or relative price increase? — by Tim S on Thu, 2006-05-11 08:17
Submitted by SnowDog on Thu, 2006-05-11 00:11
is now running national TV commercials on some of the news channels, and wants Congress to cover all those in the US who have no health insurance. They honestly believe that they are on the noble side of morality and are being left unchallenged in the arena of ideas. I think we should challenge them wherever we can. I wrote them an email.
I think we need to point out that free people are responsible for their own lives and should take responsibility for their own health insurance. Health insurance costs less than housing, food, and transportation, but few Americans would really want the government to furnish them with a house, food, and a car. Yet many of these same people want the government to furnish them with health insurance, or they want the employers of the country to do so.
That danged Hippocratic Oath — by wsscherk on Thu, 2006-05-11 14:39
Chris, you may be right, but — by SnowDog on Thu, 2006-05-11 11:08
The tragic part about this — by Chris Cathcart on Thu, 2006-05-11 02:59
Submitted by wngreen on Wed, 2006-05-10 19:08
I've been out of the loop a couple of weeks and just playing catch up so if there has already been a discussion on this piece I'm sure I'll find it soon. If not, check out this article by Shelby Steele from Opinion Journal. In it he discuses why America is so delicate with our enimies citing guilt over 'white power', slavery and past imperialism as the reason the US is so minimalist in our execution of military power. Our military is the best trained, strongest and has some of the best equipment in human history. Terrorists, be they insurgents in Iraq/Afganistan or pot belly dictator thugs like Iran and N. Korea are no match for us.
Submitted by Kyrel Zantonavitch on Wed, 2006-05-10 17:30
It's hard as holy hell to locate a copy of the recent letter from the Iranian dictator to the US president. The garbled and perhaps truncated copy below, from the Parisian daily Le Monde, is the best I can do:
Declaring War — by Dan Edge on Fri, 2006-05-12 15:38
>There seems to be little or — by PhilipC on Fri, 2006-05-12 05:30
Re Lawless America — by Capitalist on Thu, 2006-05-11 22:12
Submitted by Julian Pistorius on Wed, 2006-05-10 02:22
Janet Albrechtsen from The Australian makes some very good points in her article "Our pathetic addiction to big government" today:
WHAT is it with this country's budget obsession? Newspapers devote entire sections to tracking the winners and the losers. Being rather canny, presumably editors know what readers want. But the "what's in it for me" obsession is matched only by that other obsession that rarely gets any attention.
Interesting ... — by Lindsay Perigo on Wed, 2006-05-10 06:40
Submitted by Rick Giles on Tue, 2006-05-09 03:03
Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely
- Lord Acton, British historian
I have never agreed with that, and for various reasons. But it does have a grain of truth pertienent to this post.
Laurel leaves are the most potent of poisons
- Annon, as far as I know
When I showed the following cartoon to my Hamiltonian mate, Manda, she thought it was about my girlfriend "Laurel" leaving me. Manda's not too bright sometimes (I can say that, she'll never read this.)
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Tue, 2006-05-09 00:15
"Architecture is the scientific art of making structure express ideas." A friend asked me recently just what the hell that quote from Frank Lloyd Wright actually means -- and to answer him, I had to go all the way back to the Middle Ages.
Peter, just like Lindsay's — by Ross Elliot on Thu, 2006-05-11 05:47
Beautiful, PC! — by Lindsay Perigo on Wed, 2006-05-10 07:03
Thanks — by wngreen on Wed, 2006-05-10 02:51
Submitted by Duncan Bayne on Mon, 2006-05-08 20:26
CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, is an anti-semitic organisation that supports and is partially funded by terrorist organisations.
When Andrew Whitehead, the hero behind Anti-CAIR broadcast the truth about CAIR on his website, said Islamofascists brought a defamation suit against him.
That defamation suit failed, and FrontPage Magazine has an interview with Reed Rubinstein, the attorney responsible for the successful defense.
Sometimes reading the news cheers me up
Submitted by George Reisman on Mon, 2006-05-08 17:38
The Washington Post reports that the House of Representatives this week overwhelmingly passed a measure imposing severe penalties for “price gouging,” an alleged phenomenon it was unable to define and has left to the Federal Trade Commission to define. Once the Federal Trade Commission figures out what price gouging is, it is authorized to impose fines of up to $150 million for wholesalers and $2 million for retailers. Two year jail penalties for both retailers and wholesalers are also authorized, though presumably imposition of jail time would still require a jury trial in an actual criminal court, not a mere hearing before the FTC.
Ross, economics, and starter books — by Craig Ceely on Fri, 2006-05-12 04:36
Well, there are plenty of — by Ross Elliot on Fri, 2006-05-12 02:53
Not reading Reisman? — by Craig Ceely on Fri, 2006-05-12 00:48
Submitted by PhilipC on Mon, 2006-05-08 16:46
As someone who's been posting a lot recently, I've noticed some annoying glitches on second and following pages of threads which really slow one down and make one flip through unnecessary already-read pages upon every posting and every reading:
For a thread in which you want to follow the "flow", it makes more sense to look at it in chronological order, i.e., select "oldest first". However, if you do that,
1. After you post or when you enter a thread you are always taken back to the first page not the most recent. It takes a lot of time for this page to load and you have to wait for it to load before you select a later page, because the selection (1,2,3, first page, next page, last page) is on the bottom which loads last.
GT 90 posts — by Rick Pasotto on Mon, 2006-05-08 20:05
Yeah, I'm having this issue — by Lanza Morio on Mon, 2006-05-08 18:57
Work in Progress — by Jason Quintana on Mon, 2006-05-08 17:01
Submitted by wsscherk on Mon, 2006-05-08 13:39
None of her ideas and philosophy would be different, since her philosophy was not and is not gender-bound.
But what of her personal life and the facts of the Break?
-- Mr Ayn Rand
Ayn Rand -- parent, novelist — by wsscherk on Sat, 2006-05-13 08:12
Mother — by eg on Sat, 2006-05-13 06:20
"Unspeakably disgusting" vs "Woman Worshipper" — by wsscherk on Thu, 2006-05-11 04:04
Submitted by Duncan Bayne on Mon, 2006-05-08 05:15
I saw this t-shirt for sale today, and immediately thought of Lindsay. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if he was one of their first customers
Sadly, we're more limited — by Duncan Bayne on Sun, 2006-05-14 21:02
Nice choice for the weapon, — by Andrew Bissell on Fri, 2006-05-12 07:52
I've bought the lot! — by Lindsay Perigo on Mon, 2006-05-08 07:28
More SOLO Store
The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand
Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand