There are currently 2 users and 22 guests online.
Linz's Mario Book—Updated!
Obleftivist Yawon Bwook says Donald Twump is "THE villain of our time." Which of the following best accords with your view?
Yes he is
He's not a villain but a hero
Putin might be a bigger villain
The mullahs might be bigger villains
ISIS might be bigger villains
Ugly Wimmin might be bigger villains
Black Lives Matter might be bigger villains
Snowflake moronnials might be bigger villains
College professors might be bigger villains
Fake News outlets might be bigger villains
Pomowankers might be bigger villains
Obleftivists might be bigger villains
None of the above—specify
Total votes: 10
Submitted by removed on Fri, 2005-12-16 01:58
When Plato warned that artists cannot be trusted about truth because they deal with images, fantasies, not facts, he could have been talking about today’s Hollywood celebrities who are making movie after movie feeding the public half-truths and out-and-out misinformation. The latest one to join in this orgy of anti-capitalism and Neanderthal economics is George Clooney. Frankly I liked Rosemary much better since she tended to stick to what she knew something about: singing. George is now out there, taking over Martin Sheen’s role as the wise political sage who will awaken us to what we need to know about world economic and political affairs.
Hollywood and political fantasy — by removed on Mon, 2005-12-19 16:53
Hollywood as Fantasia — by Mark Humphrey on Mon, 2005-12-19 00:45
Submitted by tailgunner_joe on Thu, 2005-12-15 22:09
Peter Jackson is an odd animal. His first three movies proved that, given dedication, drive, vision and a sense of humour, he could indeed make amusingly bad, unconvincing, off-the-mark parodies of splatterpunk movies. Heavenly Creatures was good, but he went straight from that to a harmless bench-piece he knocked out to demonstrate that he had the chops to re-do King Kong—but had to take a long, involved, three-picture detour when the re-make of Mighty Joe Young monkeyed Hollywood out.
His most notable failing, however, is his singular inability to grasp or respect any pre-existing narrative. The Parker-Hulme murder is a fascinating story, but he filmed it as a vehicle for Richard Taylor’s blandly impressive special effects. And this is, let’s not forget, a man who just spent five years trying to make a comic-book movie out of a 1,100-page discussion of socio-linguistic teleology. Giving him one of cinema’s most beloved properties as a vanity piece is an odd move indeed.
TGJ, Proof of One Thing — by Jeff Perren on Wed, 2005-12-21 20:50
PJ has balls! — by Marcus on Wed, 2005-12-21 20:03
Submitted by removed on Thu, 2005-12-15 21:54
The following is actually wrong: "Emerson called consistency the bugbear of small minds." Emerson said that "a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds" (http://www.bartleby.com/59/3/f...).
None of this "we" bit for me! — by removed on Sat, 2006-01-14 04:55
Don't Feed the Troll — by Jason Quintana on Sat, 2006-01-14 01:08
Government, States, and Credit Where It's Due — by jriggenbach on Sat, 2006-01-14 00:37
Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Thu, 2005-12-15 05:18
[Reprised from SOLOHQ]
O/ism & Xianity — by 0 on Wed, 2011-10-19 11:40
Good — by James Heaps-Nelson on Sun, 2005-12-18 02:36
That which is true of — by Robert Malcom on Sat, 2005-12-17 22:20
Submitted by Landon Erp on Wed, 2005-12-14 19:53
I started a thread on this at the old SOLO. Got a lot of informative info thought it was worth reposting.
I may as well be honest about my reasoning for this... in my comic the first and highest profile romantic couple in my comic is a lesbian couple... not being a lesbian myself, I'm positive that without proper research I'm going to be getting things wrong right and left.
Beautiful creatures? — by Landon Erp on Mon, 2008-01-14 06:39
Transgender Films — by thewingmaker on Sun, 2007-04-08 19:21
Priest — by Landon Erp on Sun, 2007-04-01 23:44
Submitted by removed on Mon, 2005-12-12 22:32
The decision by California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger not to commute the death penalty sentence of multiple murderer Stanley “Tookie” Williams was as right and it could be under the circumstances. The case had attracted much attention because the man had been something of a model prisoner though not because he had asked forgiveness—he never admitted to the crime—but because he had become a rather well-regarded children’s book author.
Whatever the details of this case, there should be no death penalty, however. Not because some people do not deserve it or it’s cruel or barbaric but because we ought to reduce the chances of a mistake as much as it is possible. It’s a matter of prudence, not justice. (If we had infallible knowledge, it would make sense, though. But we do not.)
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Mon, 2005-12-12 21:47
Here's a lesson from history on the subject of trade and conquest, and which one of the two methods of inter-human interaction works best. Think about it:
That's presuming — by Robert Malcom on Sun, 2006-01-08 22:51
A very eloquent example — by Phil on Sun, 2006-01-08 06:46
Excellent Post — by Jason Quintana on Wed, 2005-12-14 19:48
Submitted by Ross Elliot on Mon, 2005-12-12 06:34
Born on 12 December, 1915, if Francis Albert Sinatra hadn't died in 1998, he would be 90 years old today.
A man possessed of a magnificent, swaggering confidence, a supremely powerful yet wonderfully controlled & precise voice and a sense of life that manifested itself through his interpretation of popular song, dedication to his craft & a palpable ebullience that's inspired three generations of fans & imitators galore.
And in that spirit here are three of Frank's best swinging albums. Put these on for Christmas & let The Chairman of the Board rock your house the way only he can.
Happy birthday, Frank!
Jeff, yes, we have a couple — by Ross Elliot on Tue, 2005-12-13 21:11
I have loved Sinatra for as — by seddon on Tue, 2005-12-13 17:45
Sinatra on DVD — by Jeff Perren on Tue, 2005-12-13 15:44
Submitted by Duncan Bayne on Mon, 2005-12-12 06:21
SOLO needs a third webmaster! Julian & I are both going to be away for much of the Christmas period & New Year, which means there won't be anyone 'on deck' to deal with technical problems.
So - is there a SOLOist out there with some time & expertise to donate? Please feel free to email email@example.com with any questions. If you're interested, we're running a PHP-based content management system with a SQL backend. There's little to no coding required on a regular basis, as most of the configuration handled through the CMS.
Any offers would be greatly appreciated, & would go a long way to lowering Lindsay's blood pressure
Submitted by Casey on Sat, 2005-12-10 21:15
[Note from Linz: Here is a gauntlet being laid down by Casey Fahy.
Hmmmmm... — by Michael Stuart Kelly on Sat, 2005-12-17 19:52
Edit — by eg on Sat, 2005-12-17 17:02
The same to you — by Michael Stuart Kelly on Sat, 2005-12-17 10:10
Submitted by Stephen Whittington on Sat, 2005-12-10 10:47
From my limited readings of Ayn Rand's novels, it seems to me that her view of the female (as lesser than the man - at least, that's the case that Nathaniel Branden formulates) is somewhat bizarre. If this is the case, does this suggest women are of less moral worth than the male? If that is not the conclusion one can draw, then what is?
Ted - "Tekla" — by AdamReed on Thu, 2006-10-05 18:12
I'd love to pick your brain at dinner some time — by Ted Keer on Thu, 2006-10-05 09:37
Ted - "Sookin" — by AdamReed on Thu, 2006-10-05 07:34
Submitted by bidinotto on Fri, 2005-12-09 18:30
The Objectivist Center has unveiled a brand-new Web site -- updated, more contemporary, far easier to navigate -- at:
A vast archive of information about Ayn Rand, Objectivism, and TOC is available on the site -- including all past issues of its magazines Navigator and The New Individualist. The separate Web site of The Atlas Society has also been folded into the new design.
Robert Bidinotto, Editor,
New TOC web site — by Kenny on Mon, 2005-12-12 21:15
Latest TNI — by bidinotto on Mon, 2005-12-12 18:49
I assume that latest issue — by Robert Malcom on Mon, 2005-12-12 03:03
Submitted by Titan on Fri, 2005-12-09 03:42
A LOT! — by Titan on Fri, 2005-12-09 19:30
How many do you need to — by stormyeyes on Fri, 2005-12-09 15:00
Submitted by JulianP on Thu, 2005-12-08 20:14
We've made a few changes that should be of interest.
1. SOLO Blogs
Submitted by Peter Cresswell on Thu, 2005-12-08 10:03
Here's just some of the scintilating, sparkling and occasionally excoriating writing you've missed at 'Not PC' this week by not tuning in as regularly as you should. Don't let it happen again!
Freezing their globes off in Montreal - when warming meets cooling
Thank you, sir — by Peter Cresswell on Thu, 2005-12-08 23:07
Ecological ship travel — by Jeff Perren on Thu, 2005-12-08 22:15
Outstanding! — by Lindsay Perigo on Thu, 2005-12-08 21:05
Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Wed, 2005-12-07 09:25
Hard on the heels of Phirehammer's repherence to phags, his selph-outing as the bigot I already knew he was, comes this from Monart Pon. This sort of stuff used to be standard from ARI types, including notorious closet cases. Largely, they've gotten over it. Monart & the Phirehammer Phlakes are now carrying the torch for mediaeval ignorance. Read & weep:
'The truth is this: Perigo, contrary to his boast of being "rationally passionate" and "passionately rational", is neither rational nor passionate -- not consistently so, not when it really counts. Claiming to be a "sense of life objectivist", he's trying to act out a self-contradiction. Objectivism is a philosophy, a wisdom of mind, a system of thought. A sense of life is a (fundamental) feeling in regards to one's life; it's not a philosophy. To feel one's way to wisdom, to philosophy, is to pervert one's mind and, consequently, also pervert one's sense of life. Thus, Perigo hides from the truth when it clashes with his feelings, unless admitting a truth serves to hide another more frightening truth.
I'm not surprised. — by stormyeyes on Thu, 2005-12-08 18:47
LOL — by Adam Buker on Thu, 2005-12-08 18:36
Great senses of humor — by atlascott on Thu, 2005-12-08 14:33
Submitted by removed on Wed, 2005-12-07 03:52
Before the US Constitution there was the Federalist Papers and before that the Declaration of Independence and before that John Locke’s political works and those of some others. The lineage involved most fundamentally a theory of basic human rights—natural rights, as Locke had called them, meaning they exists as a feature of our very humanity and membership in a human community.
There was debate as to whether any of these rights should even be listed in a constitution lest people in the future would think that only the listed ones exist. So as to disabuse people of this notion, the Ninth Amendment was crafted saying that unenumerated—that is, unmentioned—rights exist, let’s not forget it.
Brilliant article! — by atlascott on Tue, 2005-12-13 17:07
Reply to Duncan Bayne — by removed on Mon, 2005-12-12 12:56
Yeah, to the front page. — by stormyeyes on Sun, 2005-12-11 01:36
Submitted by removed on Tue, 2005-12-06 20:33
Machan's Musings - Saddam Hussein Learned from Richard Rorty
Tibor R. Machan
In his very instructive book Natural Right and History the justly famous classical political scientist Leo Strauss—sometimes credited with (or blamed for) neo-conservatism—makes the point that without firm standards of right versus wrong, all that can count in the determination of right and wrong is who is being earnest—whose is “a resolute or deadly serious decision.” Here is how he put the point:
If there is no standard higher than the ideal of our society, we are utterly unable to take a critical distance from that idea. But the mere fact that we can raise the question of the worth of the idea of our society shows that there is something in man that is not altogether in slavery to his society, and therefore that we are able, and hence obliged, to look for a standard with reference to which we can judge the ideals of our own as well as of any other society. That standard cannot be found in the needs of the various societies, for the societies and their parts have many needs that conflict with one another; the problem if priorities arises. This problem cannot be solved in a rational manner if we do not have a standard with reference to which we can distinguish between genuine needs and fancied needs and discern the hierarchy of the various types of genuine needs. The problem posed by the conflicting needs of society cannot be solved if we do not possess knowledge of natural right.
I think Shadia Drury got it — by removed on Fri, 2005-12-09 14:27
More on Strauss — by Pete L on Fri, 2005-12-09 04:00
Leo Strauss and neoconservatives — by Mark Humphrey on Wed, 2005-12-07 18:44
Submitted by JulianP on Sun, 2005-12-04 23:57
Hi fellow SOLOists,
I hope the first half a week or so of the new face of SOLO has been enjoyable. We have been tweaking things as we go, incorporating some good suggestions.
Stars — by Rick Giles on Tue, 2006-03-28 12:18
Bells, Whistles...Stars? — by Prima Donna on Tue, 2006-03-28 03:19
Sorry ... — by Christy L on Tue, 2005-12-06 21:12
Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Sun, 2005-12-04 21:40
A few reflections after the first few days of SOLO's new incarnation here at SOLOPassion.com:
There was some debate prior to the rebirth as to the legitimacy of "entertainment" as a value on a site like this. For me there is no debate. If SOLOPassion is not entertaining, it is falling down on part of its job—to educate and inform in an entertaining way. There is no entertainment/education dichotomy here. "Entertaining" doesn't necessarily mean "creating a laugh a minute," though humour is decidedly a value here also—it does mean educating and informing in a way that is stimulating and arresting, rather than in a cold monotone more suited to academia or people who have no sense of life-and-death urgency about the material they are purveying. The writers we have assembled here are all skilled in telling their story in a captivating way because they are passionate about it, and that's the way it'll stay. So yes, this is, unashamedly, an entertainment site—but of course, it's not just an entertainment site. Sassy, saucy, sizzling ... and salutary. That's SOLO.
Full set of dags accounted for — by Marcus on Wed, 2005-12-07 21:58
Whoever he is?! — by Lindsay Perigo on Tue, 2005-12-06 20:46
Bravo, who ever you are! — by Ciro D Agostino on Tue, 2005-12-06 16:08
Submitted by removed on Sun, 2005-12-04 19:35
Whenever a controversy arises in government funded and administered educational(?) institutions, no one in the mainstream media mentions the real source of the problem. Whether it is making the study of sex, environment, or, currently, intelligent design mandatory, the real issue is systematically avoided. This is whether there ought to be government education in a free society at all.
It is widely recognized that there should not be a government newspaper to which everyone must subscribe and which must be read by all. For good reason. The press must be free from entanglement with the government, with an agency that has as its sole job in a free country to protect individual rights. The tools and methods required for this job are entirely out of order when it comes to producing newspapers. Newspapers report on what the publishers and editors deem to be vital issues within the various layers of community of readers are members. We have local, state, national and international coverage, all important to some readers, but none of these is government’s job to accomplish. So in a free society there is likely to be a wide variety of approaches to news coverage, not to mention to editorializing. Government must adhere to the rule of law, which is supposed to be the same for all. It is naturally a one-size-fits-all undertaking.
Tibor, — by Tenyamc on Tue, 2005-12-06 06:44
public schools — by Christy L on Mon, 2005-12-05 20:04
As you say the curricula are — by Ali Hassan Massoud on Mon, 2005-12-05 15:48
Submitted by removed on Sat, 2005-12-03 10:01
The twentieth century has seen many philosophers pay a great deal of attention to the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein. It is especially his philosophy of language—i.e., his concern with the fundamental features and functions of our forms of awareness and communication—that has inspired much discussion. It is by way of an examination of language that Wittgenstein developed his theory of knowledge (although, granted, the idea that Wittgenstein had a theory of knowledge is itself controversial).
Yet Wittgenstein's approach is not to be confused with the content of his thinking. After all, hardly any philosopher could avoid an examination of language in the process of offering an account of human knowledge. Language would appear to be the only tangible and thus easily accessible feature of knowledge, though surely not its only feature. And the content of Wittgenstein's thinking, in the Philosophical Investigations  and On Certainty  testifies to the fact that he was not a crude behaviorist of the sort we might call someone whose epistemology focuses exclusively on language.
Logical Positivism — by Jeff Perren on Sun, 2005-12-04 04:19
The days of the Vienna — by Ali Hassan Massoud on Sun, 2005-12-04 02:39
Submitted by Casey on Sat, 2005-12-03 07:17
EXCLUSIVE to SOLO and The Free Radical. (Subscribe to the print edition and receive a whole lot more.)
Fifteen years have passed since David Kelley wrote this fateful passage about Barbara Branden’s book, The Passion of Ayn Rand, in an infamous paper that would, after Ayn Rand’s official intellectual heir Leonard Peikoff responded with his paper “Fact and Value,” open a rancorous schism in Objectivist scholarship. Kelley and the Ayn Rand Institute would part ways over this divisive issue and its philosophical implications, with Kelley going on to create The Objectivist Center. The TOC side argued that the biographical portrait of Ayn Rand written by Barbara Branden (eventually extending to the memoir about Rand written by Nathaniel Branden) should be regarded as an objective source of information, while the other side rejected the Brandens’ testimony outright as arbitrary assertions made without regard for the truth.
PARC — by Wayne Simmons on Thu, 2006-02-16 06:10
And — by eg on Tue, 2006-02-07 03:40
Well — by eg on Tue, 2006-02-07 03:29
Submitted by administrator on Fri, 2005-12-02 05:20
Lindsay Perigo - Founder & Principal (King of KASS)
Submitted by administrator on Thu, 2005-12-01 21:31
Here are the questions most frequently asked of the site administrators. If you have a suggestion for a new entry please post a comment & we'll look into it.
Submitted by Casey on Thu, 2005-12-01 21:07
O, this world that turns and ages with us,
Casey, just so you know I — by Lanza Morio on Mon, 2005-12-05 15:48
Carlos, my little cookie — by Ashley on Mon, 2005-12-05 13:18
Damn! I wish you guys — by Ross Elliot on Mon, 2005-12-05 06:49
Submitted by administrator on Thu, 2005-12-01 07:57
Greetings, and welcome to the new home of SOLO - Sense of Life Objectivists!
The first thing you'll need to do is sign up for a new account so you can log in to the site.
Once you've done that, you'll see that SOLOPassion already provides much of the functionality of the old site, but with 25% fewer calories (noticeable if you're trying to fit into that slinky summer dialup pipe). You can create yourself an account, submit stories, post comments, chew the fat in the Forums, and vote on (and create) polls. For those with a technological bent, there is an RSS feed available, so you can keep up to date with the very latest on the site.
Submitted by Newberry on Wed, 2005-11-30 11:35
Thanks Olivia! Yes, I was — by Newberry on Fri, 2008-10-24 00:14
Mark: "I remain suspicious — by Newberry on Thu, 2008-10-23 23:33
Michael... — by Olivia on Thu, 2008-10-23 22:49
Submitted by Lindsay Perigo on Wed, 2005-11-30 10:47
What is Objectivism?
Let its founder speak first. Asked to specify Objectivism's essentials standing on one foot, Ayn Rand, standing on one foot, said:
I would have — by Brant Gaede on Thu, 2010-02-04 17:25
Ah well Brant... — by Olivia on Thu, 2010-02-04 08:28
Solved! — by Brant Gaede on Thu, 2010-02-04 02:32
Submitted by administrator on Wed, 2005-11-30 08:57
It's here! — by Derek McGovern on Wed, 2005-12-21 11:56
More SOLO Store
The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand
Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand