Who's Online
There are currently 4 users and 14 guests online.
Online usersWho's NewPollA year after Obamalini's election, who is shaping up as a credible next President?
Sarah Palin
22%
Mitt Romney
9%
Ron Paul
13%
Bobby Jindal
13%
Mike Huckabee
3%
Glenn Beck
9%
Leonard Peikoff
16%
Tim Pawlenty
6%
Other (please specify)
9%
Total votes: 32
|
TFR Issue 69The 69th Free Radical. Is is cool to list an Ebay auction?Submitted by Jamie Clay on Wed, 2008-02-06 16:45
I'm freeing my family's collection of Brandon records from it's captivity within our storage room and wanted to let others have the opportunity to give them a new home. ( categories: )
The Real Reason for Barbara Branden's SpeechSubmitted by Casey on Sun, 2006-08-13 20:11
For anyone who thinks Barbara Branden's speech about "Objectivist Rage" is a bizarre combination of skepticism concerning the moral status of suicide bombers and psychological moralizing abo Recent Comments: Further Note — by Michael Moeller on Thu, August 17, 2006 at 11:57 good faithBut really, is — by Thomas Lee on Tue, August 15, 2006 at 16:58 Besides, Linz likes it when — by Chris Cathcart on Tue, August 15, 2006 at 16:35
( categories: )
The Silence of Ayn Rand’s CriticsSubmitted by Casey on Sat, 2005-12-03 07:17
EXCLUSIVE to SOLO and The Free Radical. (Subscribe to the print edition and receive a whole lot more.)
Fifteen years have passed since David Kelley wrote this fateful passage about Barbara Branden’s book, The Passion of Ayn Rand, in an infamous paper that would, after Ayn Rand’s official intellectual heir Leonard Peikoff responded with his paper “Fact and Value,” open a rancorous schism in Objectivist scholarship. Kelley and the Ayn Rand Institute would part ways over this divisive issue and its philosophical implications, with Kelley going on to create The Objectivist Center. The TOC side argued that the biographical portrait of Ayn Rand written by Barbara Branden (eventually extending to the memoir about Rand written by Nathaniel Branden) should be regarded as an objective source of information, while the other side rejected the Brandens’ testimony outright as arbitrary assertions made without regard for the truth. Recent Comments: PARC — by Wayne Simmons on Wed, February 15, 2006 at 22:10 And — by eg on Mon, February 6, 2006 at 19:40 Well — by eg on Mon, February 6, 2006 at 19:29
( categories: )
Free Radical Issue 69 - Table of ContentsSubmitted by administrator on Wed, 2005-11-30 08:57
This is the complete table of contents for the 69th Free Radical. Some of the content will be made available online, but to read most of it you'll have to subscribe to the print edition.
Recent Comments: It's here! — by Derek McGovern on Wed, December 21, 2005 at 03:56
( categories: )
|
User loginNavigation |